Baseless & useless speculation? Try reading the very first post on this thread. Did Nancy Pelosi not suffer a defeat, her very fist show of strength by backing John Murtha for majority leader & had her head handed to her when Stenny Hoyer got the nod?
Where this thread went from there is another thing, but as usual, the wally draggles hijack every thread they don't like because they can't debate the facts!
The thread wasn't hijacked, honey. You imploded it yourself when you trotted out your idiotic accusation of Pelosi endorsing Nambla. When MC, who at least appears capable of mounting a coherent argument, joined you in this sliming; you took to calling her "Nancy Nambla Pelosi". The two of you have steadfastly clung to this unsupportable idiocy ever since. Maybe you should mention bomb throwing to some of the real trolls once in awhile.
LoneStarMadam wrote:okie wrote:John Murtha, of ABSCAM fame, yessiree, the most honest and most ethical operation ever is what Nancy advocates.
John "Cold blooded murdering Marines" Murtha is another wally draggle
And Murtha is one smart military tactician as well. He brilliantly calls for retreating to Okinawa, as "the way forward" from the current quagmire in Iraq. No doubt he draws much of his brilliance from real military experience in WWII.
LoneStarMadam wrote:Baseless & useless speculation? Try reading the very first post on this thread. Did Nancy Pelosi not suffer a defeat, her very fist show of strength by backing John Murtha for majority leader & had her head handed to her when Stenny Hoyer got the nod?
Where this thread went from there is another thing, but as usual, the wally draggles hijack every thread they don't like because they can't debate the facts!
Harry Hay and Nancy Pelosi both support gay rights, hence, they both marched in the parade. Jeffery Dahmer and I both liked the Green Bay Packers, hence, we may both have sat next to each other at the same game. Were your twisted logic to be valid; that would mean I must support cannibalistic serial killers. I don't believe I've ever publicly condemned Dahmer for his activity. Is this really further evidence that I support cannibalistic serial killers? Of course not. Therefore continuing to forward the idiotic notion that it does would qualify my accuser as a troll.
To hear you accuse others of hijacking, because they objected to your baseless slimy lies, and then suggest they are the real trolls is indicative intentional trolling behavior or simple idiocy.LoneStarMadam wrote:If you really wish to locate the real trolls, you need look no further than the nearest mirror. This will continue to be the case until you abandon the practice of flaming out at others while forwarding exposed lies all the while ignoring the most basic principles of critical thinking.Maybe you should mention bomb throwing to some of the real trolls once in awhile.
LittleBitty, I don't believe I've treated you badly or unfairly in any exchange we've had. I've seen others lump you in with LSM and MC but haven't seen justification for doing so thus far. <shrugs>
I agree with all you say, which is scary...but I would call it low-jacked.
That is pretty scary. I should save this little Gem, or maybe even put it in my Sig line! 
How very appropriate for you to know that quote.
LoneStarMadam wrote:Baseless & useless speculation? Try reading the very first post on this thread. Did Nancy Pelosi not suffer a defeat, her very fist show of strength by backing John Murtha for majority leader & had her head handed to her when Stenny Hoyer got the nod?
Where this thread went from there is another thing, but as usual, the wally draggles hijack every thread they don't like because they can't debate the facts!
Harry Hay and Nancy Pelosi both support gay rights, hence, they both marched in the parade. Jeffery Dahmer and I both liked the Green Bay Packers, hence, we may both have sat next to each other at the same game. Were your twisted logic to be valid; that would mean I must support cannibalistic serial killers. I don't believe I've ever publicly condemned Dahmer for his activity. Is this really further evidence that I support cannibalistic serial killers? Of course not. Therefore continuing to forward the idiotic notion that it does would qualify my accuser as a troll.
To hear you accuse others of hijacking, because they objected to your baseless slimy lies, and then suggest they are the real trolls is indicative intentional trolling behavior or simple idiocy.LoneStarMadam wrote:If you really wish to locate the real trolls, you need look no further than the nearest mirror. This will continue to be the case until you abandon the practice of flaming out at others while forwarding exposed lies all the while ignoring the most basic principles of critical thinking.Maybe you should mention bomb throwing to some of the real trolls once in awhile.
LittleBitty, I don't believe I've treated you badly or unfairly in any exchange we've had. I've seen others lump you in with LSM and MC but haven't seen justification for doing so thus far. <shrugs>
Tarnished buy it?
While you may not be insulting LB, you have no qualms on insulting her husband?
Where i come from insulting ones spouse is as bad as insulting the peson one is speaking to.
What a greasy way to suck up.
OCCOM BILL wrote:LoneStarMadam wrote:Baseless & useless speculation? Try reading the very first post on this thread. Did Nancy Pelosi not suffer a defeat, her very fist show of strength by backing John Murtha for majority leader & had her head handed to her when Stenny Hoyer got the nod?
Where this thread went from there is another thing, but as usual, the wally draggles hijack every thread they don't like because they can't debate the facts!
Harry Hay and Nancy Pelosi both support gay rights, hence, they both marched in the parade. Jeffery Dahmer and I both liked the Green Bay Packers, hence, we may both have sat next to each other at the same game. Were your twisted logic to be valid; that would mean I must support cannibalistic serial killers. I don't believe I've ever publicly condemned Dahmer for his activity. Is this really further evidence that I support cannibalistic serial killers? Of course not. Therefore continuing to forward the idiotic notion that it does would qualify my accuser as a troll.
To hear you accuse others of hijacking, because they objected to your baseless slimy lies, and then suggest they are the real trolls is indicative intentional trolling behavior or simple idiocy.LoneStarMadam wrote:If you really wish to locate the real trolls, you need look no further than the nearest mirror. This will continue to be the case until you abandon the practice of flaming out at others while forwarding exposed lies all the while ignoring the most basic principles of critical thinking.Maybe you should mention bomb throwing to some of the real trolls once in awhile.
LittleBitty, I don't believe I've treated you badly or unfairly in any exchange we've had. I've seen others lump you in with LSM and MC but haven't seen justification for doing so thus far. <shrugs>
OB, you're obviously an intelligent guy. You apply a clever wit to your posts, remiscent of Dennis Miller.
I can't help but observing that it goes completely over the top to describe an opinion that is shared by the author of the Specator and for a conservative to use descriptors like slime to describe our conjecture or accuse of spreading lies. You know as well as I that you know no better than I or LoneStar if Pelosi knows or does not know. That goes for everyone else who has used that particular epithet against myself, LSM or LB. Calling any of us liars is patently absurd, since no one here has a guest pass into Nancy Pelosi's head.
It's also surprising to me that as a fellow conservative, that you grant an elected highly placed democrat official an unconditional waiver of accountability of her associates. This attempt to present all of these absurd examples is diminished and discredited by the unalterable fact that elected officials are routinely held accountable for the people that they associate with. If you doubt that for a second, think about all the Bush bashing that materialized around Bush associating with the Bin Laden family.
Furthermore, as the poster who is probably most familiar with the various fallacies of logic, you should know best that a point is not proven simply as a result of the number of people that disagree.
I'm not relying on an Argumentum ad populum here, I'm reacting to an utter lack of credible evidence to support an incredibly specious claim.OCCOM BILL wrote:LoneStarMadam wrote:Baseless & useless speculation? Try reading the very first post on this thread. Did Nancy Pelosi not suffer a defeat, her very fist show of strength by backing John Murtha for majority leader & had her head handed to her when Stenny Hoyer got the nod?
Where this thread went from there is another thing, but as usual, the wally draggles hijack every thread they don't like because they can't debate the facts!
Harry Hay and Nancy Pelosi both support gay rights, hence, they both marched in the parade. Jeffery Dahmer and I both liked the Green Bay Packers, hence, we may both have sat next to each other at the same game. Were your twisted logic to be valid; that would mean I must support cannibalistic serial killers. I don't believe I've ever publicly condemned Dahmer for his activity. Is this really further evidence that I support cannibalistic serial killers? Of course not. Therefore continuing to forward the idiotic notion that it does would qualify my accuser as a troll.
To hear you accuse others of hijacking, because they objected to your baseless slimy lies, and then suggest they are the real trolls is indicative intentional trolling behavior or simple idiocy.LoneStarMadam wrote:If you really wish to locate the real trolls, you need look no further than the nearest mirror. This will continue to be the case until you abandon the practice of flaming out at others while forwarding exposed lies all the while ignoring the most basic principles of critical thinking.Maybe you should mention bomb throwing to some of the real trolls once in awhile.
LittleBitty, I don't believe I've treated you badly or unfairly in any exchange we've had. I've seen others lump you in with LSM and MC but haven't seen justification for doing so thus far. <shrugs>
OB, you're obviously an intelligent guy. You apply a clever wit to your posts, remiscent of Dennis Miller.
I can't help but observing that it goes completely over the top to describe an opinion that is shared by the author of the Specator and for a conservative to use descriptors like slime to describe our conjecture or accuse of spreading lies. You know as well as I that you know no better than I or LoneStar if Pelosi knows or does not know. That goes for everyone else who has used that particular epithet against myself, LSM or LB. Calling any of us liars is patently absurd, since no one here has a guest pass into Nancy Pelosi's head.
It's also surprising to me that as a fellow conservative, that you grant an elected highly placed democrat official an unconditional waiver of accountability of her associates. This attempt to present all of these absurd examples is diminished and discredited by the unalterable fact that elected officials are routinely held accountable for the people that they associate with. If you doubt that for a second, think about all the Bush bashing that materialized around Bush associating with the Bin Laden family.
Furthermore, as the poster who is probably most familiar with the various fallacies of logic, you should know best that a point is not proven simply as a result of the number of people that disagree.
I think Lil Bit is smart enough to realize I was speaking about decorum not opinions.
And my comment wasn't restricted to specific people. There's been a lot of mud slinging from all directions.
Lonestar, if she feels insulted by my post, she's quite capable of speaking up for herself. Please butt out with your rudeness. It is very tedious.
