OmSigDAVID wrote:Cycloptichorn wrote:Surprisingly large?
Yes.
By their ranting,
or use of political power, or of media influence
to undermine, curtail, and violate citizens' rights
of self defense and to
the necessary emergency equipment thereof,
one wud expect the number of gun-carrying
anti-gun zealouts to be ZERO.
That has not proven to be the case,
referring to Sen. Diane Feinstein, Sen. Charles Schumer,
Eleanor Roosevelt, anti-gun actress Jennifer O'Neill
( movie "The Summer of '42 " )
who accidentally shot herself in the stomach, at home,
Washington Post writer Carl Rowan,
who called for a complete prohibition
of all guns except police,
who used an illegal gun and SHOT a tresspasser
for swimming in Rowan 's pool.
Those are all the ones
that I remember at the moment.
Quote:
What percentage do you have on this, OmSig?
I said nothing about percentages.
Quote:
What statistics or facts lead you to believe this?
See facts above; no statistics.
Quote:
What research have you done to show that this is true?
I did no research; these facts just
came to light in the media, over the years, EFFORTLESSLY.
Quote:
My guess is: none.
U like to do my thinking FOR ME, huh ?
Quote:And I'm saying this as a guy who supports the Second Amendment and people's rights to own firearms.
Cycloptichorn
Getting a little HOSTILE, are we, gunlover ?
David
I am no more a 'gunlover' than I am a hatchet-lover or a blender-lover. A gun is just a tool for doing one's work like any other tool and should be treated as such.
I merely take exception to the erroneous use of terms such as 'surprisingly large.' Surprising to who? How large is large (other than your preclivity for making large, colored posts)?
You haven't done any research, have no statistics, posts, or evidence; yet you advance a point as if it were a fact. Don't.
Cycloptichorn
