Rosie and Extremism

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wud take issue with u Kuvasz,
but your ad hominem venom
betokens a state of hysterical confusion that defies logic.

I don 't choose to argue with Gracie Allen; forget it.
David

Quote:

Oh, nice try weaseling.
Don't have your little pop guns to protect your bad craziness on-line?

That makes NO SENSE.
R u PROUD of your irrationality ?
U were rational, on Abuzz.
Looks like u went downhill, since.

Quote:

And you might try reading your own words, cowboy.
As a liberal I responded to your own lying and venom attacking liberals as cheats.

By the nature of liberalism,
it cannot exist without DEVIATION
from something, from some standard,
or some body of rules.
That is what liberalism has always meant:
the opposite of orthodoxy.

Quote:

And I note how twisted your mind is, since you just accused yourself of hysterical behavior, you friggin' Brainiac. You are just like most right wing bullies. You can dish it out but cannot take it in return.

This is a forum
for rational, analytical discussion,
( that is FUN )
not for mindless screaming,
as u perpetrated.
I don 't choose to have discourse
with a nasty version of Gracie Allen.

Quote:

Its likely why you are such a gun nut too.

It was the original theory
of the Founders that the citizens
were supposed to be well armed
so that thay cud remove government
if thay found that to be necessary.
It distresses me that my fellow citizens
are no longer well armed, like thay r supposed to be.

That is pivotal and fundamental
to preservation of a free republic:
the owners ( the citizens ) are supposed
to always be able to remove their
hireling real estate manager,
if such be their choice

Quote:

btw thank you, actually Gracie Allen was the brains of the duo,

not while IN CHARACTER

Quote:

you on the other hand are a grotesque combination of Joe and Charlie MacCarthy, but considering your phonetics, perhaps with a touch of Mortimer Snerd.

MORE hysterical venom; gross.
U disgrace yourself.
U shud be ashamed.



Now go back to fondling your guns and tumescing over them.

kuvasz wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wud take issue with u Kuvasz,
but your ad hominem venom
betokens a state of hysterical confusion that defies logic.

I don 't choose to argue with Gracie Allen; forget it.
David

Quote:

Oh, nice try weaseling.
Don't have your little pop guns to protect your bad craziness on-line?

That makes NO SENSE.
R u PROUD of your irrationality ?
U were rational, on Abuzz.
Looks like u went downhill, since.


Seems you cannot even admit your own words anymore

Quote:

And you might try reading your own words, cowboy.
As a liberal I responded to your own lying and venom attacking liberals as cheats.

By the nature of liberalism,
it cannot exist without DEVIATION

that actully is the nature of life itself. read up on irreversable themodynamics. by denying it, you deny the way the world functions.
from something, from some standard,
or some body of rules.
That is what liberalism has always meant:
the opposite of orthodoxy.[/b]

No, that is called heterodoxy, look it up.

Liberalism is expressed in our Declaration of Independence. With your way of thinking we would still be saluting the British Crown. Tory.

and I note that you don't deny you opened up the first salvo on personal attacks, so your argument is lower than whale shite

Quote:

And I note how twisted your mind is, since you just accused yourself of hysterical behavior, you friggin' Brainiac. You are just like most right wing bullies. You can dish it out but cannot take it in return.

This is a forum
for rational, analytical discussion,
( that is FUN )
not for mindless screaming,
as u perpetrated.[/color]

seems you are the one who startesd all this, by calling liberals cheats and did so without substantiation, except for accusing Kennedy of doing things to Native Americans whom you admitted you forgot. That is what you consider rational thought these days? What are you, in the early stages of Altzheimers?
I don 't choose to have discourse
with a nasty version of Gracie Allen.[/b][/color][/size]

Quote:

Its likely why you are such a gun nut too.

It was the original theory
of the Founders that the citizens
were supposed to be well armed
so that thay cud remove government
if thay found that to be necessary.
It distresses me that my fellow citizens
are no longer well armed, like thay r supposed to be.[/color]

well guess what I own several firearms, from rifles to shotguns to pistols.

That is pivotal and fundamental
to preservation of a free republic:
the owners ( the citizens ) are supposed
to always be able to remove their
hireling real estate manager,
if such be their choice

Quote:

btw thank you, actually Gracie Allen was the brains of the duo,

not while IN CHARACTER

Quote:

you on the other hand are a grotesque combination of Joe and Charlie MacCarthy, but considering your phonetics, perhaps with a touch of Mortimer Snerd.

MORE hysterical venom; gross.
U disgrace yourself.
U shud be ashamed.

gee, its fine to call me a cheat and a gracie allen and allude to ditziness but when I call you a lying yahoo knucklehead, that is gross? What is it with you conservatives? you are just a typical conservative whining tittie ass crybaby who freaks out when your victims gives you back a taste of your own medicine. you guys are such pussies in a fair fight.

Now go back to fondling your guns and tumescing over them.

I'm still failing to see the logic of your claim that to live life well one must be a pessimist.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

kuvasz wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wud take issue with u Kuvasz,
but your ad hominem venom
betokens a state of hysterical confusion that defies logic.

I don 't choose to argue with Gracie Allen; forget it.
David

Quote:

Oh, nice try weaseling.
Don't have your little pop guns to protect your bad craziness on-line?

That makes NO SENSE.
R u PROUD of your irrationality ?
U were rational, on Abuzz.
Looks like u went downhill, since.


Seems you cannot even admit your own words anymore
I have no idea what u mean;
probably just as well

#######################

Quote:

And you might try reading your own words, cowboy.
As a liberal I responded to your own lying and venom attacking liberals as cheats.

By the nature of liberalism,
it cannot exist without DEVIATION

that actully is the nature of life itself. read up on irreversable themodynamics. by denying it, you deny the way the world functions.
If u hired me at an agreed rate of $400 an hour
and I billed u at the rate of $500 an hour
taking a liberal interpretation
of our contract
and telling u that is " the way the world functions "
and that I am taking a heterodox vu of that contract,
I don 't believe u 'd approve of that.

We 'd see how LIBERAL
u 'd be when YOUR ox was gored.

########################




from something, from some standard,
or some body of rules.
That is what liberalism has always meant:
the opposite of orthodoxy.

No, that is called heterodoxy, look it up.

Liberalism is expressed in our Declaration of Independence.
NO; the American Revolution
was RADICAL
( relative to the power
of the King of England in America ), not liberal.

#####################


With your way of thinking we would still be saluting the British Crown. Tory.

I have always supported
the American Revolution.

What I conserve
is the social/political contract in America:
the US Constitution.
I have never borne allegiance
to the British Crown,
tho my mother once did.

######################



and I note that you don't deny you opened up the first salvo on personal attacks, so your argument is lower than whale shite [/color][/size]
I stated a fact about
the nature of liberalism;
I reaffirm, reiterate and ratify it here,
as if set forth at full length.

#######################

Quote:

And I note how twisted your mind is, since you just accused yourself of hysterical behavior, you friggin' Brainiac. You are just like most right wing bullies. You can dish it out but cannot take it in return.

What I CAN do
and what I choose
to put up with
r not the same thing.

##############





This is a forum
for rational, analytical discussion,
( that is FUN )
not for mindless screaming,
as u perpetrated.[/color]






seems you are the one who startesd all this, by calling liberals cheats


The innermost essence
of liberalism is cheating.
If we contract with one another
and we each do what we AGREED
to do, then there was nothing liberal
about how that contract was carried out.
We were both rigidly conservative.

If I give u 10% less than what I promised
to do, giving u a sob story instead of
the promised performance,
telling u : " that 's close enuf "
and I have a heterodox vu of our contract,
then I am applying
a liberal vu of that contract,
thereby CHEATING U.

If I give u 20% less than
u were supposed to get
and I tell u: " that 's close enuf;
don 't be too technical "
then I am being MORE LIBERAL.

If I give u NOTHING
in exchange for what u paid me,
then I am being RADICAL.








and did so without substantiation, except for accusing Kennedy of doing things to Native Americans whom you admitted you forgot. That is what you consider rational thought these days? What are you, in the early stages of Altzheimers?[/color][/size]
I don 't choose to have discourse
with a nasty version of Gracie Allen.[/b][/color][/size]

Quote:

Its likely why you are such a gun nut too.

It was the original theory
of the Founders that the citizens
were supposed to be well armed
so that thay cud remove government
if thay found that to be necessary.
It distresses me that my fellow citizens
are no longer well armed, like thay r supposed to be.[/color]








well guess what I own several firearms, from rifles to shotguns to pistols.

What 's your favorite pistol ?

Me. too. osso! Scroll, scroll, scroll, your screen, Merrily past the red!
If you read to much of it, You'll have to go to bed....
with a blinding headache!

I don't agree with screamers who post in large letters.
I think we should all scroll past David. He makes no sense.

Rosie spoke the truth. Extreme Christianity hates people like Rosie--because she is gay and they would throw her in jail if they could completely control the government. That's why Bushie and his gang have to be totally beaten in November!!

My, my! Is this the same MarionT who earlier in this thread wrote:

MarionT wrote:

Rosie spoke the truth. Extreme Christianity hates people like Rosie--because she is gay and they would throw her in jail if they could completely control the government. That's why Bushie and his gang have to be totally beaten in November!!

Dartagnan wrote:

My, my! Is this the same MarionT who earlier in this thread wrote:

MarionT wrote:

Rosie spoke the truth. Extreme Christianity hates people like Rosie--because she is gay and they would throw her in jail if they could completely control the government. That's why Bushie and his gang have to be totally beaten in November!!

Marion has seen the light.