sweetcomplication,
Please phrase your arguments coherently.
There is no factual basis for your arguments. You simply rant and vociferate emotions.
Let's make this easy.
I'm arrogant, an ass, ride a high horse (his name is Boodle BTW) and am a vlillain of, as blatham would say, Biblical proportions.
Now that we got insulting me out of the way we can try substantiating your arguments.
sweetcomplication wrote:
1) yeah, right; oh, arrogant one;
We already did the insult craven thing so whenever you want to add anything to that feel free to do so. Most Arab nations are not rich, the few that are are rich in per capita but not in volume. This is supported by statistics.
If you'd like to contend this feel free to look up some statistics and show me.
sweetcomplication wrote:
2) but it's a start;
A very small start. 10 million really is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount that is needed.
sweetcomplication wrote:
3) but, you certainly aren't rambling, though, are you?
I ramble all the time. But I try to get in a valid argument every now and then.
Don't get angry if someone says you ramble. It's not an indignity or anything.
Watch: I ramble. I am rambling.
My ego is intact.
sweetcomplication wrote:
4) It's Israel, not Isreal; if it were "is real" there would be no problems;
I make lots of spelling errors and typos. Point them out if you wish but if I really cared about them I'd use the spell check.
Again, a point, argumen, factoid, anything to accompany the dig woudl help add to the discussion.
sweetcomplication wrote:
5) this only referred to "individual aid, which if you had followed this thread, you would have seen where someone else offered to send his own money;
I do not think individual aid is significant. If your point is that YOU shouldn't give money I couldn't care less. I was speaking of bigger fish.
sweetcomplication wrote:
6) of course, I agree with aid from the U.s.A.; oh, please!
common ground. Let's build a fort. You can pick the flag's colors.
sweetcomplication wrote:
7) I know most people probably do want this; count me among them;
good to hear. More common ground. Do we make a footy field or a basketball court? You decide because the pool is mine.
sweetcomplication wrote:8) full normalization with Israel; I doubt it; look up their Nazi connections if you can climb down off your high horse long enough to do so;
Whose Nazi connections? I believe you may have stepped into a grey area as far as facts are concerned.
anywho, the horse's name is Boodle!
sweetcomplication wrote:
9) right of return? then, Native Americans need to be given back there land now!
You can find me saying that I do not support "right of return" in many places.
What you will not find is one single instance of me supporting "right of return".
So, this is common ground but you don't seem to get that.
sweetcomplication wrote:
btw: your Eminence is aware that a 2-state solution was offered to both sides upon creation of the State of Israel in 1947? the response was a resounding "yes" from the Israelis and just the opposite from the "Palestinians"
In retrospect this was a big error on the Arab's part.
But it's easy to understand their motivations.
Isreal will of course say yes. After all they stood to gain.
The Arabs stood to lose territory with nothing to gain. This is why they rejected it. Now before you rant at me about this I have already said this was a mistake on their part.
sweetcomplication wrote:
10) there was no drop-of-the hat "rant", as you put it, re self-hating Jews; this has been a long-standing conflict among us; I'm almost certain you've heard of internalized self-hatred?
Thing is, sc, you seem loaded for bear. You miss common ground and sometimes find disagreement where there is none.
I know that "self hating Jew" is an old term.
You claim it was not employed fecklessly by yourself so please tell us who you were directing the accusation toward.
