Why do you still support Bush?

DEPLORING BUSH
By William F. Buckley Jr.
Fri Jun 23, 8:08 PM ET



On the matter of the president's uttering sentences that are garbled, Weisberg can't be argued with. But a difficulty with language can be attributed to many public figures, paradoxically, even to such as have proven skills. The young Dwight David Eisenhower, for instance, actually wrote military manuals when he served under Gen. Douglas MacArthur, who was a fussy overseer and a guardian of holy prose. And of course we know that en route to the White House, Ike served as president of Columbia University.



George Bush met in public debate Al Gore, an experienced debater, and walked away with immunity, as he would do four years later in his encounters with John Kerry. Weisberg doesn't take on the question of Bush being accepted at Yale, and achieving enough credits to graduate. It requires skills not generally associated with idiocy to maneuver so as to win the nomination of a national political party, and then an election, not once but twice.

Wiretaps Illegal? Not according to the Attorney General who said:

.

This will be proved by the decision to be issued in a few days by the USSC.
They will adjudicate the judicial fate of the Guantanamo Prisoners. If, as you erroneously claim, the Supreme Court was Republican, the Court would indeed vote 9-0 that the present military tribunals approved by the President of the United States can indeed stand.

They will not approve the military tribunals thereby putting the lie to your unsound claim.

Mr. Imposter says: "The Congress and Supreme Court are Republicans"


The Supreme Court is not Republican. Noone knows how the members of the Supreme Court vote. They are not appointed to the Court according to party loyalty.

I'm a LIBERAL, because I want small government, a small federal deficit, less government intrusion into my life, and a president that can speak the English language without crucifying it, and a "smart" president that knows how to lead our country without alienating half the world. I am considering voting for John McCain, because I'm a LIBERAL.

I'm not a neocon like Whothefunk, BernardR, Ashman, and others who blindly support this president that have taken us into a war illegally and without justifiable, error-free cause that have resulted in the killing of some 50,000 innocent (by latest estimates), noncombatant Iraqis, taken away our freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution to privacy, violated the very tenents of a democracy by torturing and not providing legal counsel to prisoners, and have no plan to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yes, I'm a LIBERAL just like Ginsburg.

Nothing. Sometimes I just get pissed at the world; nothing personal.

People credit me with saying things I've never said, and misinterpret things that are spelled out in simple English.

If you happend to be in target range, the pellets sometimes hits innocents, but my shots never kills. They're actually harmless.