The Worst President in History?

Duly noted.

0 Replies

I see Bernard didn't address Gus' point of David is the one that shot Kennedy. I guess that means Gus' post stands as unrebutted.

Congratulations Gus. You have just beat Bernard at his own game.

0 Replies

BernardR wrote:

I find it amusing that D'Artagnan, Apisa and Xingu can excoriate Om Sig for relating his feelings concerning Kennedy without giving reasons why Kennedy was one of the GREATEST OF AMERICAN PRESIDENTS.

The reason they cannot do so is that History is showing that Kennedy was a pathological liar who,be subterfuge, sought to make himself look great, but was, in reality, a fake.

Anyone who has read--"The Dark Side of Camelot"by Seymour Hersh knows that Mr. Hersh has commented on the book written by Ted Sorensen-_Kennedy's close adviser--"Kennedy" YEARS AFTER THE EVENT THAT THE PRESIDENT' S BROTHER, BOBBY, MADE A SECRET AGREEMENT WITH THE SOVIET FOREIGN MINISTER TO GIVE NIKITA KHRUSCHEV THE TRADE HE WANTED- JUPITER MISSLES REMOVED FROM TURKEY IN EXCHANGE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF SOVIET MISSLES FROM CUBA.

This deal only came to light years later and it was agreed that there would be no publicity of it from either side.

But, Kennedy crowed that he looked Khruschev in the eye and Khruschev blinked.

Kennedy was assassinated and we got an even worst president in his place, Lyndon(do you want to see my member) Johnson!

I remember that Senator Capeheart of Indiana
had been warning of the presence of nuclear missles in Cuba
during the summer of 1962 and Kennedy denounced him as " an alarmist "
doing nothing about the communist missles until he just happens to notice them
in October before the Congressional elections.
David

0 Replies

Gus- You don't really think that Om Sig killed Kennedy, do you? You were only kidding, weren't you? If you were not, you had better have a good explanation for the fact that Om Sig was in another city far far away from the assassination. Are you saying that Om Sig was part of a plot?
If so, please explicate.

0 Replies

parados wrote:

I see Bernard didn't address Gus' point of David is the one that shot Kennedy. I guess that means Gus' post stands as unrebutted.

Congratulations Gus. You have just beat Bernard at his own game.

Thanks, parados. It took some thinking on my part.

0 Replies

BernardR wrote:

Gus- You don't really think that Om Sig killed Kennedy, do you? You were only kidding, weren't you? If you were not, you had better have a good explanation for the fact that Om Sig was in another city far far away from the assassination. Are you saying that Om Sig was part of a plot?
If so, please explicate.

Let's just say I have photos. I am currently working on a book on this very subject and Om Sig will be facing some serious charges once the book is published.

I can't go into too much detail right now. Look for the book.

"Kennedy's Killer. A Tale of Om Sig" by Gustav Ratzenhofer.

Available this September.

0 Replies

gustavratzenhofer wrote:

I think you're the guy that killed Kennedy.

Multiple chuckles.

Actually, during the last week of November 1963,
my friends were asking me if I had just gotten back from Dallas
( all in a spirit of good humor ).
David

0 Replies

BernardR wrote:

Gus- You don't really think that Om Sig killed Kennedy, do you? You were only kidding, weren't you? If you were not, you had better have a good explanation for the fact that Om Sig was in another city far far away from the assassination...

Bernie and OSD knew each other in '63, it seems. Kindred spirits who have maintained a connection for so long! It's almost touching...

0 Replies

OmSig...and Bernie the nut case...

...perfect together.

Jesus H. Keerist!

How do they function?

0 Replies

Do not release your materials yet, Gus. Om Sig will sue your butt off.

A libel judgment can be very expensive. I would urge you to shelter whatever assets you have before he sues. After he brings the matyerial from the Congressional Investgation to the judge and jury, you are dead meat.

0 Replies

Can't be sued if it's the truth; something you lack Mr Bernie.

0 Replies

D'artagnan wrote:

BernardR wrote:
Gus- You don't really think that Om Sig killed Kennedy, do you? You were only kidding, weren't you? If you were not, you had better have a good explanation for the fact that Om Sig was in another city far far away from the assassination...

Bernie and OSD knew each other in '63, it seems.
Kindred spirits who have maintained a connection for so long! It's almost touching...

I wish u wud nt say that;
I don 't accept that concerning Bernie.
I don 't know what he has to do with 1963.
He was unknown until around 1984.

However, I DID wish Barry Slotnick good luck with the case,
when I encountered him in the NYC Civil Court for NY County.
David

0 Replies

Barry was quite a guy, wasn't he, Om Sig!!!

0 Replies

cicerone imposter wrote:

Can't be sued if it's the truth;
something you lack Mr Bernie.

That is error,
and truth is an affirmative defense to defamation litigation
( i.e., the burden of proof is on the defendant ) in my jurisdiction.

0 Replies

BernardR wrote:

Barry was quite a guy, wasn't he, Om Sig!!!

Yes; he did a good job for Bernie.

0 Replies

Om Sig wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:
Can't be sued if it's the truth;
something you lack Mr Bernie.
On sig replied:
That is error,
and truth is an affirmative defense to defamation litigation
( i.e., the burden of proof is on the defendant ) in my jurisdiction.

Mr.Imposter is frequently erroneous. Thank you for utlizing your legal expertise, Om Sig, in correcting him!!!

0 Replies

An extensive Library? Really, Mr.Apisa? Do you ever read any of the books in it? I think not because in all of your many obscenity laced bumbling puerile posts, you have never, to the best of my knowledge, offered any facts from Historical or Scientific sources.

If you have trouble reading the big words, get someone to help you.

0 Replies

BernardR wrote:

An extensive Library? Really, Mr.Apisa? Do you ever read any of the books in it? I think not because in all of your many obscenity laced bumbling puerile posts, you have never, to the best of my knowledge, offered any facts from Historical or Scientific sources.

If you have trouble reading the big words, get someone to help you.

I have no trouble reading anything you write...and I have had acknowledgement of my own writing abilities from publications like the New York Times, Newsweek Magazine, Time and dozens upon dozens of other newspapers throughout the United States and in England.

I just love deflating pompous, arrogant hayseeds like you, Bernie. You guys roast so nicely....and make such funny noises when doing so.

Twisted Evil

0 Replies

I believe you Mr. Apisa. But then why are you so shy? We would love to see some examples of your writing abilities. I haven't seen any yet.

Why don't you give us some examples. You can use some of the many many items you have published. They are not pornograhic are they?

If so, I understand your reticence!!!

If not, let us observe your talents. Don't be shy!!!!

0 Replies

I too would dearly like to see some of Frank's serious writing that isn't disrespectful of the reader. Frank, do you have a thousand words or so, on any topic, that might give us all a better appreciation of your capacity? Can you give us citationf for your published work? I'm not even sure what field you've dedicated your life and career to.

0 Replies

The Worst President in History?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know