0
   

The Worst President in History?

 
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:41 am
What Joe (he got it right) Nation said.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 07:15 am
I would stagger through life not knowing what I said if not for the capable and much appreciated interpretation skills of Joe Nation.

For that I am grateful.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 07:50 am
I don't hate people I don't like. It's better to ignore them. If one can't get rid of hatred, it's could be because they are misanthropes and need to deal with what people do and say as disdainful (oh, gawd, that could be read as being in agreement with BernardR -- excuse me, I have to have another cup of coffee and a Prozac).
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 07:59 am
Hating someone takes a great deal of energy, usually more energy than the person you are expending it on is worth.

George Bush is certainly not worth the energy it takes to hate him. "Terrible nightmare" is apt. Thanks, Joe.




Am I the only one who noticed that BernardR admires gus?
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 08:01 am
Lightwizard wrote:
I don't hate people I don't like. It's better to ignore them. If one can't get rid of hatred, it's could be because they are misanthropes and need to deal with what people do and say as disdainful (oh, gawd, that could be read as being in agreement with BernardR -- excuse me, I have to have another cup of coffee and a Prozac).


No movies here, lightwizard. Move along.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 08:04 am
Go sit on a rake. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 11:51 am
Joe Nation wrote:
No you didn't, you might have been bitter about it, but nobody hated Presidents back then.
Hate was invented as a political tool by those who hated Clinton. They believe in it so much they think everybody does it, that's why you think everybody, including Gus, hates Bush, but we don't.

We think he's a joke. A terrible nightmare foisted upon by the haters.

Joe(idiots)Nation


No.
That 's a factual error.
I remember the PASSION with which I hated
Kennedy and the evil leftist demons with which he surrounded himself.
The philosophy ( filosofy ) of his pseudo-Administration
was friendship toward the neutrals,
neutrality toward our communist enemies
and enmity toward our friends.

I believed that as a result of his policies,
communist tanks wud eventually come rolling down my street,
and I 'd have to take a gun and put a round thru my mother 's head,
thanks to Kennedy, the last round being for myself.

His every leftist act, on the news nite after nite,
week after week, was an instrument of pain.

I was forever yelling for impeachment.

In retrospect,
Kennedy et al were not worth
the passionate hatred that I directed against them.

I remember watching Ronald Reagan on " Death Valley Days "
but I had no way of knowing
that communism wud collapse during his Administration.

During Clinton 's Administration,
I was not willing to support the burden
of another impassioned hatred; not worth it.
Kennedy n Johnson were worse.
David
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 12:01 pm
Quote:
That 's a factual error.
I remember the PASSION with which I hated
Kennedy and the evil leftist demons with which he surrounded himself.
The philosophy ( filosofy ) of his pseudo-Administration
was friendship toward the neutrals,
neutrality toward our communist enemies
and enmity toward our friends.


A little bit unstable here, aren't you; na, let me change that; very unstable; and you have a gun.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 12:03 pm
xingu wrote:
Quote:
That 's a factual error.
I remember the PASSION with which I hated
Kennedy and the evil leftist demons with which he surrounded himself.
The philosophy ( filosofy ) of his pseudo-Administration
was friendship toward the neutrals,
neutrality toward our communist enemies
and enmity toward our friends.


A little bit unstable here, aren't you; na, let me change that; very unstable; and you have a gun.


VERY!
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 12:27 pm
OSD's rant makes for an eloquent argument for more careful screening of gun purchasers...
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:17 pm
D'artagnan wrote:
OSD's rant makes for an eloquent argument for more careful screening of gun purchasers...

Aside from the fact that government has no jurisdiction for that
( any more than it has jurisdiction to make sure that u get to church on time ),

that 's a ridiculous thing for u to post,
as if anyone who wanted a gun
wud not buy one from a blackmarket gunsmith,
if he were too lazy to make one himself
( the same as no one cud get bathtub gin in the 1920s,
and like no one can get marijuana now ). How naive ARE u ?

In my childhood, I had quite a few functional guns,
( in common with most of
the other kids in my neighborhood in Phoenix ),
but that did not stop us from making our own guns,
just because it was fun. It was fast n ez,
but not as fast as making boms.

We detonated them in pits we dug in our backyards,
usually at nite,
or sometimes out on the desert.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:21 pm
xingu wrote:
Quote:
That 's a factual error.
I remember the PASSION with which I hated
Kennedy and the evil leftist demons with which he surrounded himself.
The philosophy ( filosofy ) of his pseudo-Administration
was friendship toward the neutrals,
neutrality toward our communist enemies
and enmity toward our friends.


A little bit unstable here, aren't you; na, let me change that; very unstable; and you have a gun.

Yeah,
quite a few of them, since I was 8 years old,
but never any trouble.

If I really am as unstable as u allege,
how do u explain that ? bad police work ?
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:22 pm
OmSigDAVID, what are you? Are you human?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:24 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
xingu wrote:
Quote:
That 's a factual error.
I remember the PASSION with which I hated
Kennedy and the evil leftist demons with which he surrounded himself.
The philosophy ( filosofy ) of his pseudo-Administration
was friendship toward the neutrals,
neutrality toward our communist enemies
and enmity toward our friends.


A little bit unstable here, aren't you; na, let me change that; very unstable; and you have a gun.


VERY!

No; I 'm just straightening out Joe Nation 's historical illusions.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:28 pm
I find it amusing that D'Artagnan, Apisa and Xingu can excoriate Om Sig for relating his feelings concerning Kennedy without giving reasons why Kennedy was one of the GREATEST OF AMERICAN PRESIDENTS.

The reason they cannot do so is that History is showing that Kennedy was a pathological liar who,be subterfuge, sought to make himself look great, but was, in reality, a fake.

Anyone who has read--"The Dark Side of Camelot"by Seymour Hersh knows that Mr. Hersh has commented on the book written by Ted Sorensen-_Kennedy's close adviser--"Kennedy" YEARS AFTER THE EVENT THAT THE PRESIDENT' S BROTHER, BOBBY, MADE A SECRET AGREEMENT WITH THE SOVIET FOREIGN MINISTER TO GIVE NIKITA KHRUSCHEV THE TRADE HE WANTED- JUPITER MISSLES REMOVED FROM TURKEY IN EXCHANGE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF SOVIET MISSLES FROM CUBA.

This deal only came to light years later and it was agreed that there would be no publicity of it from either side.

But, Kennedy crowed that he looked Khruschev in the eye and Khruschev blinked.

Kennedy was assassinated and we got an even worst president in his place, Lyndon(do you want to see my member) Johnson!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:29 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
OmSigDAVID, what are you? Are you human?

I am a GREAT LOVER OF PERSONAL FREEDOM,
unlike the rest of u.
David
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:30 pm
I think you're the guy that killed Kennedy.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:32 pm
And Gustavrathenholtzer, he is too modest to tell you that he is ( or was) an attorney with many years of experience and a great deal of knowledge about the second amendment. His style of writing is one which conforms to the late Colonel McCormick's idea of writing.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:34 pm
Oh. I'm sorry. I guess I just didn't recognize true genius.

I will try to be more observant next time.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 01:38 pm
He is not a genius and he would be the first one to tell us, but he is a very bright person who can debate with you and others if you would deign to attempt to put your messages in a logical form instead of making irrational and puerile pot shots which mean nothing!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.73 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 03:15:02