0
   

What's Up With Republicans and Sex?

 
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 08:55 am
Does it matter? Trust me, having been banned for a week because I let my mouth run free because of this pitiful excuse for a man just ain't worth it.

Get back on topic! You're a combative person, as am I. We have to get over it, and move on. We need to shut the hell up, and take pleasure in posting the topic! I keep kicking myself and force myself to remember poor scared little Tico skulking under Mommies dress ... Do you really need any more of a picture than that??

Anon
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:02 am
Back on topic!

From dailykos

Quote:
And After The Spanking, The Oral Sex!
by LunkHead
Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 07:21:08 AM PDT

This is a good diary, because I get to quote Monty Python and the Holy Grail:

Dingo: You must spank her well, and after you are done with her, you may deal with her as you like... and then... spank me.
All: And me. And me too. And me.
Dingo: Yes. Yes, you must give us all a good spanking.
Dingo: And after the spanking, the oral sex.
Galahad: Well, I could stay a bit longer...

Driving to work today, and listening to CSPAN Radio, I heard three reporters were talking about Delay, while avoiding calling him corrupt, because he "Hadn't been convicted".
I wondered why these folks were still dutifully "servicing" Delay, even though he's resigned.
He's corrupt, that's a fact, much in like former majority leader Jim Wright's book deals were corrupt, though legal.
My mind wandered to "servicing" particularly of the oral variety, and it hit me that this (and spanking) is what ties the Republican party's disparate constituencies together.
WARNING!!!! Mental images of kinky Republican sexuality, and their views on sexualities below the break.

* LunkHead's diary :: ::
*

Think about it:


* Religious Right: Oral SEX Roberts

* Monica Lewinski coup: Oral Sex.

* Gay Marriage: Oral Sex.

* Newt Gingrich: Gingrich campaign worker Anne Manning admitted that she gave Newt oral sex while he was still married to his first wife.

* Robert Linligthgow "Bob" Livingston, Jr.: (Speaker for about 16 minutes in 1998) Spanking (Scuttlebutt on his sex scandal was that he's into leather).

* Jack Abramhoff's Downfall: Michael Scanlon's trashy sex with a waitress (can you say BLOW JOB?) that led him to break off his engagement with Emily Miller, and she ratted his profligate lifestyle out.

* Deregulation: Making the public "service" the corporations.

* Abortion: OK, this one is conventional coitus. But GOOD sex involves foreplay.

* Jim Bakker: He was hooking up with a pro. BLOW JOB

* Bob Barr: Photographed licking whipped cream off of strippers at his inaugural party. (OK, it's not technically sex, but it is unequivocally oral).

* Helen Chenoweth: Admitted to a six-year adulterous affair with a married associate. BLOW JOB

* John Fund: Impregnated the daughter of an old girlfriend and then encouraged her to abort his child. (No direct evidence of blow job, but sleeping with the mother AND the daughter needs to be noted).

* Henry Hyde: Had an extramarital affair with a woman who was married and had three children, during the course of which she and her husband were divorced. BLOW JOB

* Bernard Kerik: had two simultaneous adulterous affairs. BLOW JOB (Two affairs at once? Now we know what he did to Rudy Guilini in order to get his job)

* Rudy Giuliani: Had an adulterous affair. BLOW JOB

* Bill O'Reilly: Falafel man. He may not have gotten any, but the court papers show that he desperately wanted a blow job.

* Jack Ryan: Pressured his wife, actress Jeri Ryan, to have sex with other men. Tricked her into visiting sex clubs, where he asked her to have sex with him while others watched. (Insert 7 of 9 joke here)

* Ed Schrock: Withdrew his candidacy for a third term after tapes of him soliciting for gay sex were circulated. BLOW JOB

* Jimmy Swaggart: Had an affair with a prostitute. BLOW JOB


There you have it. All Republican actions are about blow jobs, desire for blow jobs, and envy that Democrats get more than they do.

0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:07 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
except that I detect and underlying nastiness and hatefulness in Lash's posts that I hope I do not convey.

I can only assume that this must have been one of those things that were said tongue-in-cheek.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:19 am
nimh wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
except that I detect and underlying nastiness and hatefulness in Lash's posts that I hope I do not convey.

I can only assume that this must have been one of those things that were said tongue-in-cheek.


Laughing
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:47 am
nimh wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
except that I detect and underlying nastiness and hatefulness in Lash's posts that I hope I do not convey.

I can only assume that this must have been one of those things that were said tongue-in-cheek.


Is there a language curve we are dealing with here?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 10:22 am
nimh wrote:
But, eh ... just out of curiosity ... what exactly is "particularly disgusting" about remembering the song that was playing the first time you experienced (fondly remembered) oral sex? It was on-topic even, it being Neil Young and she posting about it on a thread she started about Neil Young.. I think its kinda sweet, actually. I dont remember what music was playing first time I had sex...

So, what, was it the mention of oral sex (shock horror - god knows we never talk about such stuff on A2K)? The mention of oral sex with a woman? There's not like, any detail about it, or any specific shocking quality ... What disturbs you so deeply about this: Question


Disgusting is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 10:24 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
Good advice, anon. But how else should one characterize someone who we assume is an adult who would go back and search all of someone's posts in an attempt to smear and libel her?


How exactly do you claim I "smeared" and "libeled" you? By proving you to be a liar?

You lied (just as you did previously as Nikki) when you asserted you had not previously posted here as Chrissee, Harper, and twin_peaks_nikki. Then you accused me of lying when you claimed I was libeling you. You practically begged me to prove you to be a liar. My doing so is neither a "smear" nor "libel."
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 11:20 am
Ticomaya wrote:
How exactly do you claim I "smeared" and "libeled" you? By proving you to be a liar?

That's a very interesting question you're raising here, Tico. I'll start pondering it as soon I've stopped beating my wife. (As everybody knows, we libertarians are at least as evil as conservatives. I have to live up to our reputation.)
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 12:02 pm
Weak argument Thomas (and a less agreeable new avatar too).

Harper/Roxxxxxxxanne is indeed abrasive. There are worse faults in this world, but this one generally diminishes the level of discorse on these threads. She says she is merely acerbic, and our negative reaction is an indicator of our relative lack of political acumen. Meanwhile she has cut back a bit on the offensive name-calling. I appreciate the intermission from that, but I don't buy her basic proposition.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 01:34 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Weak argument Thomas (and a less agreeable new avatar too).


Criminey George! We all get old, sooner or later!

Anon
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 01:45 pm
Thomas's new avatar is certainly better than the Paul Krugman one.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 01:49 pm
Thomas wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
How exactly do you claim I "smeared" and "libeled" you? By proving you to be a liar?

That's a very interesting question you're raising here, Tico. I'll start pondering it as soon I've stopped beating my wife. (As everybody knows, we libertarians are at least as evil as conservatives. I have to live up to our reputation.)


Thomas,

Now I'm confused ... is it your wife, or your closet boyfriend that you're beating up??

Anon
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 03:12 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Weak argument Thomas (and a less agreeable new avatar too).

What am I supposed to do? A2K doesn't have an irony smiley. This must be why you have missed that my irony was directed against Roxxanne's pseudo-psychoanalytic smear. My facial expressions towards my monitor made that strikingly obvious when I wrote my last post -- I am mystified how you couldn't see them from San Francisco.

While it is sad you can't appreciate that I'm Douglas Adams now, I am not surprised. You are Irish; Adams' absurd humor is utterly English; there is no hope you could ever `get' him.

AnonVoter wrote:
Now I'm confused ... is it your wife, or your closet boyfriend that you're beating up??

I'll leave that to your phantasy.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 03:20 pm
That's not Phil Collins? I like Phil Collins...
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 03:22 pm
Thomas wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
Weak argument Thomas (and a less agreeable new avatar too).

What am I supposed to do? A2K doesn't have an irony smiley. This must be why you have missed that my irony was directed against Roxxanne's pseudo-psychoanalytic smear. My facial expressions towards my monitor made that strikingly obvious when I wrote my last post -- I am mystified how you couldn't see them from San Francisco.


Laughing I detected your expression about the third time I read your post ... thankfully in plenty of time to delete the retort I was typing up.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 04:10 pm
Well, it's true - I did obtusely and inexcusably miss Thomas' irony earlier. Insincere thanks to Thomas for pointing it out and also to Tyco for pileing on. Who could expect irony or even a taste for absurd British humor from a Bavarian libertarian scientist - even one with roots in America? (I suspect Thomas - like so many others - secretly wishes he was Irish.)

I liked the picture of Scalia better.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 06:18 pm
Maybe I didn't make myself clear in my original post. What's up with Republican PUBLIC OFFICE HOLDERS and Sex?

(I too adore the little gray donkey named Roger, and didn't mean to make a broad statement about every single republican in the country.)

I doubt that, given the over-blown ( :wink: ) response to Bill and Monica, democrats holding public office are doing the same things but not getting any ink just because such is expected from "liberals." You can bet there'd be plenty of reporting if that were the case.

Thanks to a few who have managed to post examples between the little cat fight that occured. There are plenty more.

Google "Republican Sex" and you get THIS. (27,700,00 - Mostly references to weird sex by Republican office holders)



Google "Democrat Sex" and you get THIS. (13,800,00 - Mostly Same Sex Marriage issue, Clinton, or hits due to the paper itself having "Democrat" in it's name)

I'd forgotten about the Representative from Georgia saying on the air that he had had sex with a mule, and most farm kids do!

They even seem to have a pinchant for writing "dirty" books.

So, am I over generalizing or are you guys trying to be politically correct by claiming it's a universal thing?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 06:51 pm
Oh, nice hit....
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 07:03 pm
Yeeeaaa, We Win! Very Happy .......(I think? Did anybody win?) Sad
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 07:03 pm
georgeob1 wrote:

I liked the picture of Scalia better.


Off topic but you list your location as "San Francisco Bay Area" Just wondering, is it raining over there in Richmond?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 01:30:14