What's Up With Republicans and Sex?

Roxxxanne wrote:

Well, you obviously do not know me. Your libel will not be tolerated and it will not continue. You can be rest assured at that.

I see old habits die hard.

Okay, Harper/Chrissee/Nikki/Roxxanne, here's the proof of your A2K lineage ... not that any is needed, because anybody who's been paying attention already knows the truth. (Well, and then there's AV, who obviously hasn't been paying attention.)

(A) When you were here posting as Harper, you revealed you used to live in Baltimore, and then in Florida. You revealed your interest in music. You revealed you did stand-up comedy. You also posted in Spanish. Harper/Chrissee/Nikki had an obsession with homosexuality and gay marriage.

(B) Then later, when you were posting as Chrissee, you revealed you moved to Twin Peaks, California, from Lake Worth, Florida.

(C) Then, in case you've forgotten, while you were posing as twin_peaks_nikki, I posted proof that you had previously posted as both Chrissee and Harper ... HERE ... despite your ridiculous attempts to initially lie and deny it.

...

(D) Now, in the 4 long months you've been posing as Roxxxanne, you've revealed you used to live in Baltimore (And click here for a particularly disgusting link), then in Florida, and now San Francisco. And you've revealed your interest in music and singing. And you've revealed you did stand-up comedy. And you've also posted in Spanish. And you have an obsession with homosexuality, and gay marriage.

QED.

You must really take us for fools.

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Anon-Voter wrote:
Actually Lash, I tried to correct my error in addressing her but the Topic was locked.

The only error you made was in your spelling of Chrissee.

AV wrote:
I don't know that she's a duplicate.

For your benefit, first she was Harper, then she became Chrissee, then she became twin_peaks_nikki, now Roxxxxxanne.

Knowing your severe allergy to the truth, you understand why I'll file this in the "Horseshit" File!

Anon

I guess that shows the quality of your judge of character.

I know you haven't got the courage of your convictions ... Hiding under Mommies dress isn't what I would call great character!!

Anon

0 Replies

bookmark

0 Replies

Oh, I meant to post the dates of your alter's on A2K:

Harper (4/29/04 - 11/21/04)

Chrissee (12/29/04 - 10/22/05)

twin_peaks_nikki (10/24/05 - 12/04/05),

Roxxxanne (12/04/05 - ???)

0 Replies

WTF does it matter?

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

WTF does it matter?

Tico gets wood by doing it for some reason ... tiny mind??? I can't believe he put the time in to go through all that "proof". Rolling Eyes

Anon

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

WTF does it matter?

It matters, dlowan, because she lied when she denied her alter-egos. She then accused me of lying. As I saw it, my options were either to let that stand, or prove her again to be a liar. I chose the latter.

0 Replies

You denied the obvious truth of it and asked him for proof. I think we all agree it isn't very important, except to deprive harper of the illusions she would have us accept about her, and the tolerance she demands for her generally abrasive posts.

0 Replies

Well, I may have intimated as such, some time ago, thought I did, anyway.

I first noticed Harper, and rather liked Harper.
I've noticed all the changes and not commented, or I don't think I did.

There was a post, some time ago, when Twin Peaks, perhaps, said she could be many persons and no one would notice.

I always noticed, but saw the same person.

I sometimes agree with Rox, and whatever her background am glad she posts here.

0 Replies

BACK TO TOPIC!!!!!!!

The Franklin Coverup Scandal

The Child sex ring that reached Bush/Reagan Whitehouse

http://www.thelawparty.com/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm

Anon

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

dlowan wrote:
WTF does it matter?

It matters, dlowan, because she lied when she denied her alter-egos. She then accused me of lying. As I saw it, my options were either to let that stand, or prove her again to be a liar. I chose the latter.

Well, yes...but anybody who would have the faintest interest already knows the answer, and anybody who doesn't wouldn't have the faintest interest....and this stuff has already carried on over how many threads now?

Hell, I know and I don't care.

Anyhoo....I will butt out, or the let's not bother about it will turn into a melee as well.

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

(D) Now, in the 4 long months you've been posing as Roxxxanne, you've revealed you used to live in Baltimore (And click here for a particularly disgusting link)

No questions from me about Roxx being the same person as (etc), nor about the general abrasivity (sp?) of her posts - she's like, the leftwing equivalent of Italgato. (Nothing less, nothing more). Its a pathology I dont understand, often wondered about, think is indicative of some major problems, but that doesnt really matter that much in the end either.

But, eh ... just out of curiosity ... what exactly is "particularly disgusting" about remembering the song that was playing the first time you experienced (fondly remembered) oral sex? It was on-topic even, it being Neil Young and she posting about it on a thread she started about Neil Young.. I think its kinda sweet, actually. I dont remember what music was playing first time I had sex...

So, what, was it the mention of oral sex (shock horror - god knows we never talk about such stuff on A2K)? The mention of oral sex with a woman? There's not like, any detail about it, or any specific shocking quality ... What disturbs you so deeply about this: Question

Roxxxanne wrote:

The first time I went down on a woman, she had Everybody Knows This is Nowhere on the stereo. "Down by the river, I shot my baby." "I want to live with the Cinamon Girl" "The losin end"

How the hours will bend
through the time that you spend [..]

Funny, I can't remember the album side ending...oh mah God, that was December like 1972, in a little apt on 22nd st, Baltimore, she was Italian but looked Oriental, gosh I am still in love.

0 Replies

squinney wrote:

Repression? Maybe. But, why would so many be Republican rather than Democrat? Dems just seem to come right out with it if they are gay, such as Barney Franks, and the Gov. from up North - Maryland?? or Mass?

Maybe people have learned from experience that Democrats are usually pervs, but Republicans usually aren't. They have come to hold Republicans to higher standards. Thus, exposing deviant behavior is newsworthy if a Republican did it, but old news if a Democrat did it. Maybe perverse Democrats don't surprise anyone anymore.

Do I believe this? Of course not. In fact, I think such an interpretation would be nothing but a narrow-minded, mean-spirited partisan smear. But it wouldn't be any worse than the narrow-minded, mean-spirited partisan smears from some of the Republicans' liberal psychoanalysts in this thread.

0 Replies

Thomas,

You're so cute, and how quaint!

Ok,OK, I would bet large sums of money that Roger, (little gray/blue donkey avatar) is neither a child molestor or a sexual pervert. Roger is a true gentleman in every way. So I concede the point to you ... NOT EVERY Republican qualifies!

Thanks for straightening that out!! You're so cute ... just want ta hug ya!!

Anon

0 Replies

Republicans are so cute!

They spend what ... 80 Million Dollars proving that Bill got head from Monica, got him in a corner, and the dumb sonofabitch lied to a grand jury. Bingo, you're impeached. The worst thing that happened to the nation since it's inception ... BC got a BJ!! From a consenting adult ... and we paid 80 Mill for that gem!!

So now we have Giuliani, who while he was married, and in office, committed adultry (this weren't no blowj*b baby), paraded his whore around in public and embarrassed his poor wife to tears.

Now, for the Republicans, this man is presidential material! I just love it! The hypocrisy is so thick you can wring it out of the air like baby piss out of a wet diaper.

Decided or Not, Giuliani Charts a Path to 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/07/nyregion/07rudy.html?hp&ex=1144468800&en=24121cba7e22780e&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Don't ya just love Republicans? Gotta give em high marks for audacity and crassness!!

Anon

0 Replies

nimh,

Love the avatar!!

Anon

0 Replies

AND IN THIS MORNINGS PAPER

F.B.I. and Justice Dept. Are Faulted Over Child Predators on Web

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/07/us/07porn.html

Quote:

"Why has it taken so long for the department to act and rescue children in imminent danger of being molested?"

So why the foot dragging? Are they afraid they're going to end up at the Whitehouse again??

Anon

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:
dlowan wrote:
WTF does it matter?

It matters, dlowan, because she lied when she denied her alter-egos. She then accused me of lying. As I saw it, my options were either to let that stand, or prove her again to be a liar. I chose the latter.

Well, yes...but anybody who would have the faintest interest already knows the answer, and anybody who doesn't wouldn't have the faintest interest....and this stuff has already carried on over how many threads now?

Hell, I know and I don't care.

Anyhoo....I will butt out, or the let's not bother about it will turn into a melee as well.

Yea Bunny,

This rates right there with who gives a **** ... and it's off topic!! You're a good bunny, how about a scritch behind the ears??

Anon

Anon

0 Replies

nimh wrote:

No questions from me about Roxx being the same person as (etc), nor about the general abrasivity (sp?) of her posts - she's like, the leftwing equivalent of Italgato.

Except that you are wrong, my posts are not abrasive, they are acerbic and mostly tongue in cheek. The humor goes over most people's heads here or it is just not funny in text form.

I am a pretty typical in your face political poster. What it took me a long time to realize is that I am posting at a political forum in which most of the participants lack political acumen. It seems that the people who post here drop in from other threads as an after thought. A frioend recommnded this site but she was not the living-breathing-think politics 24/7 that I am. a2k seems to be better for people who enjoy the lighter forums.

If you were really astute, nimh, you would have called me the left-wing equivalent of Lash (not this other person who I do not even know)
except that I detect and underlying nastiness and hatefulness in Lash's posts that I hope I do not convey.

0 Replies

Good advice, anon. But how else should one characterize someone who we assume is an adult who would go back and search all of someone's posts in an attempt to smear and libel her?

0 Replies

What's Up With Republicans and Sex?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know