0
   

What's Up With Republicans and Sex?

 
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Oct, 2006 06:59 am
Adding Rep. Foley (R-Fla) to the list
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 06:37 am
Adding Haggard to the list.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 10:05 am
It's unbelievable. But so typical. Those screaming the loudest are usually the guiltiest.

I almost choked when he said that he bought the meth but threw it away. It kind of reminded me of Bill but I understood his claim of not inhaling. This one tho is just too lame to believe. What a clown. I wonder about his wife, his kids. He has five children. Sad
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 11:09 am
I thought that a persons private life had no bearing on anything.
I thought that a persons private life was not to be considered in any way when talking about what kind of person they are or how they govern.

OR,is it just the dems private lives that are off limits?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 11:11 am
mysteryman wrote:
I thought that a persons private life had no bearing on anything.
I thought that a persons private life was not to be considered in any way when talking about what kind of person they are or how they govern.

OR,is it just the dems private lives that are off limits?


it should be off limits.... but the repubs, conservatives, and good christian people are the ones that have openede the door to such microspoic looks at and parading in public of peoples' personal lives.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander beeyatch Laughing
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 11:15 am
mysteryman wrote:
I thought that a persons private life had no bearing on anything.
I thought that a persons private life was not to be considered in any way when talking about what kind of person they are or how they govern.

OR,is it just the dems private lives that are off limits?


Try telling that to Marion "the bitch set me up" Berry.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 01:14 pm
mysteryman wrote:
I thought that a persons private life had no bearing on anything.
I thought that a persons private life was not to be considered in any way when talking about what kind of person they are or how they govern.


I certainly agree here.


Ehem, why haven't you followed your own advice until now?
0 Replies
 
Libcoesque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 02:01 pm
mysteryman wrote:
I thought that a persons private life had no bearing on anything.
I thought that a persons private life was not to be considered in any way when talking about what kind of person they are or how they govern.

OR,is it just the dems private lives that are off limits?


The criticism is not with private lives of conservatives like Haggard. The criticism is with the hypocritical manner in which he led the public effort to cast stones.

hyp-o-crite

-noun

1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.

2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 02:14 pm
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 02:32 pm
MM, I agree.

The personal life of a public figure is of insignificant import, but when the MO of the public person has been to poke and prod into the personal lives of others, their's becomes fair game.

You want to publicly condemn drug use, don't be a user.
You want to excoriate homosexuals, don't pack fudge in the champagne room.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 03:25 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
I thought that a persons private life had no bearing on anything.
I thought that a persons private life was not to be considered in any way when talking about what kind of person they are or how they govern.


I certainly agree here.


Ehem, why haven't you followed your own advice until now?


Who's private life have I mentioned?
Who's private life have I condemned?
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 03:40 pm
Is it possible you did not like Clinton's private life? Just asking.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Nov, 2006 03:49 pm
But he never mentioned or condemned that ...
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 07:31 pm
Foley focus of Florida criminal probe
POSTED: 7:48 p.m. EST, November 16, 2006
Adjust font size:
(CNN) -- The Florida Department of Law Enforcement has opened a criminal investigation of former Rep. Mark Foley, who resigned in September after his e-mails with teenage congressional pages came to light, a spokeswoman said Thursday.

The agency opened a preliminary inquiry into Foley's conduct shortly after his resignation.

Foley was in Florida Thursday for the funeral of his father.

FDLE spokeswoman Kristen Perezuela said the agency has found "a basis to open a criminal investigation."

"The e-mails are one thing we're looking into," Perezuela said, adding the Florida agency was continuing to assist the FBI, which has been conducting its own Foley probe.

Authorities have been investigating whether Foley might have used computers in Florida to engage or solicit minors in any illegal activities.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/16/foley.probe/index.html
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:51 pm
Adding Republican Senator Craig to the list.

Adding president of the Young Republican National Federation.

Adding Republican Senator Vitter.

Just updating.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 09:15 pm
Quote:


Study finds left-wing brain, right-wing brain

Even in humdrum nonpolitical decisions, liberals and conservatives literally think differently, researchers show.
September 10, 2007

Exploring the neurobiology of politics, scientists have found that liberals tolerate ambiguity and conflict better than conservatives because of how their brains work.

In a simple experiment being reported today in the journal Nature Neuroscience, scientists at New York University and UCLA show that political orientation is related to differences in how the brain processes information.

Previous psychological studies have found that conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments whereas liberals are more open to new experiences. The latest study found those traits are not confined to political situations but also influence everyday decisions.

The results show "there are two cognitive styles -- a liberal style and a conservative style," said UCLA neurologist Dr. Marco Iacoboni, who was not connected to the latest research.

...


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-sci-politics10sep10,1,7735909.story?coll=la-headlines-nation

0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Sep, 2007 10:03 am
Very interesting JTT. I kind of always thought so.
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Sep, 2007 10:15 am
So does this mean we should be nicer to each other since the other side really can't help themselves?

And what about independents? Are their brains half and half? Does this mean they are deviants and need to be ignored totally since there is obviously something wrong with them? So many questions and so few answers.

Cool
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Sep, 2007 10:36 am
detano inipo wrote:
Is it possible you did not like Clinton's private life? Just asking.


I didnt and dont care about his private life.
Its what he did on my dime and on my time that I objected to.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Sep, 2007 10:40 am
Those damn wasted dimes...


http://drinkingliberally.org/blogs/oakland/archives/bush-clearing-brush.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 04/29/2025 at 08:55:16