Lash wrote:Roxxxanne wrote:Good advice, anon. But how else should one characterize someone who we assume is an adult who would go back and search all of someone's posts in an attempt to smear and libel her?
I think you could call them "someone who goes straight for the evidence to prove what they're saying."
I can see why you'd really hate that.
It's too bad your search for truth doesn't extend into your own government!
Anpn
Too bad yours stops short of your own party.
Lash wrote:Too bad yours stops short of your own party.
I thyought I had a party, but I don't ... They're too busy being chickenshit and acting like Republicans! I can honesty say I don'y have a party ... Nice try! Too bad you don't have an inquiring mind ... it isn't that hard, for some.
Anon
It isn't going to be enough for you to point to historical instances of Democratic corruption these days, Lash.
Your party is in the thick of it. Yes, the Dems also have problems; I'll be the first to say that they have to clean house as well. I fully expect some dems to be kicked out of office for corruption within the next few years.
None of this is going to stop the slo-mo implosion of the Conservative movement over the next few years. A combination of bad decisions and corruption have brought/are bringing down Republicans across the board, from Strategists such as Norquist and Reed, to Lobbyists like Abramoff and his K-street cronies, Senators, Congressmen, and the WH has three crippling problems at the moment - the Plame affair, the NSA scandal, and Iraq. Any one of the three could spell the downfall of the Bushies at this point.
Can you say the same about the Dems? No, you cannot. Perhaps in the future; hell, undoubtedly in the future, you will be able to. But not today.
If you truly champion clean and honest government, I should see you writing here about the various problems inherent within the Republican party and the system itself, not posting snarky pictures of the Clintons and whistling past the graveyard.
Cycloptichorn
Anon--
Thre's a distinction between not questioning, and buying wholesale every negative thing that comes down the pike.
Lash wrote:Anon--
Thre's a distinction between not questioning, and buying wholesale every negative thing that comes down the pike.
I most certainly do not ... I have developed a habit Republicans detest ... it's called reading ... from many sources, not just one! I don't accept any one viewpoint any more because I know it's tainted by where you get it from. That's whyI read from various and conflicting standpoints, because when you do that, certain FACTS surface no matter who's telling the story! It's called reserch and thinking for yourself Lash! You did it about gays Lash, you better do it ABOUT YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT.
I think the U.S fas probably already fubared itself, and now we're talking about bombing Iran. What a bunch of morons. You know what, maybe we should, because I'm sure that would quicken that flushing action that has already started. Maybe the world will start getting the idea like they did with Hitler and do something about us before we do any more damage!
Anon
Anon--
As I've said before, I read several different sources to get my news. Have done so for years. I just don't believe everything I read. Your blanket assumptions are incorrect.
Historically, the party in power, especially in the second term, begins to chipped away, and then, sand blasted. You add that normal occurrence to the anti-Bush phenomena, plus an unpopular war, multiplied by conspiracy theories, with an exponent of legitimate complaints--and you have some people screaming like nothing like this has ever happened before, and that the world is coming to an end.
It's not.
Lash,
My findings have nothing to do with second term, I've been finding these links since 9/12. Bush was warned repeatedly and often before 9/11, and it came out instantly! I ran Interactions with this info in 2001 on Abuzz, not 2006! Ask Squinney, she was involved in the Interactions. The warnings were published in The Faz, a Number One German newspaper BEFORE 9/11. Bush was warned by foreign secret service agencies BEFORE 9/11. The only thing he didn't have was the exact date! Unfortunate;y he has attacking Iraq too far up his ass to pay attention to the clear and present danger!!
WAKE UP!!
Anon
Anon-
Was that the conspiracy that blames the Jews? Or the Bush family? There were several crazy theories, and I hate to see that you bought one.
There was a recent one, saying the Pentagon wasn't really hit by the plane.
Bush orchestrated it, of course.
Do you believe that, too?
I get all the info I need from My Weekly Reader, I'm an informed voter. Did you read about the hippo that had a turtle for a best friend?
anon,
Quote:The only thing he didn't have was the exact date!
I know where you live,and I'm gonna come blow up your house.
It might be today,it might be in 10 years.
What are you gonna do about it?
I havent done anything yet,so you cant pre-emptively attack me.
You dont know when its gonna happen,but you know its gonna happen.
How do you stop me?
dyslexia wrote:I get all the info I need from My Weekly Reader, I'm an informed voter. Did you read about the hippo that had a turtle for a best friend?
Congratulations, you have become 100% more informed than any rightwinger who has graced this Topic!!
Anon
mysteryman wrote:anon,
Quote:The only thing he didn't have was the exact date!
I know where you live,and I'm gonna come blow up your house.
It might be today,it might be in 10 years.
What are you gonna do about it?
I havent done anything yet,so you cant pre-emptively attack me.
You dont know when its gonna happen,but you know its gonna happen.
How do you stop me?
Bin Laden hadn't attacked the US before 9/11?
You getting forgetful in your old age MM? I am sure I can point you to your posts that claim all kind of Bin Laden attacks if you need to be reminded.
So, Clinton should've done something, of course.
"I remember when the air was clean, and sex was dirty." -- George Burns
parados wrote:mysteryman wrote:anon,
Quote:The only thing he didn't have was the exact date!
I know where you live,and I'm gonna come blow up your house.
It might be today,it might be in 10 years.
What are you gonna do about it?
I havent done anything yet,so you cant pre-emptively attack me.
You dont know when its gonna happen,but you know its gonna happen.
How do you stop me?
Bin Laden hadn't attacked the US before 9/11?
You getting forgetful in your old age MM? I am sure I can point you to your posts that claim all kind of Bin Laden attacks if you need to be reminded.
Please do.
Show me one post where I claimed that Bin Laden attacked the US before 9/11.
I know I listed terrorist attacks that happened before 9/11,but I didnt make any claim that Bin Laden was responsible.
If such a claim exists,made by me,please do post a link to it.
squinney wrote:mysteryman wrote:
Please do.
Show me one post where I claimed that Bin Laden attacked the US before 9/11......,please do post a link to it.
PLEASE DON'T!
Sqinney,
Please tell Lash about the Abuzz court hearings when you acted as my assistant, when they were, and what they were about.
Anon
