revel wrote:
So this statement:
Quote:Several police sources said the officer, who was not identified,
just means that they won't say who the officer is?
Yes, that is what that statement means.
Quote:How do you know there are
Quote: a number of confirming, cross-corrobative eyewitness reports, including testimony or affidavit delivered under oath?
Do you have a source other than other police officers?
Quote:It has not been publically released
So we don't know what is on the videotape.
Quote:Lawyer Says McKinney a Victim in Scuffle
... Members of Congress wear identifying lapel pins and routinely are waved into buildings without undergoing security checks. McKinney was not wearing her pin at the time, and the officer apparently did not recognize her, she has said.
"Congresswoman McKinney, in a hurry, was essentially chased and grabbed by the officer," Myart said. "She reacted instinctively in an effort to defend herself."
Several Capitol Police officials have said the officer involved asked McKinney three times to stop. When she did not, he placed a hand on her and she hit him, they said. ...
Quote:U.S. attorney reviewing McKinney case ... McKinney, 51, scuffled with a police officer on March 29 when she entered a House office building without her identifying lapel pin and did not stop when asked.
Several police sources said the officer, who was not identified, asked her three times to stop. When she kept going, he placed a hand somewhere on her and she hit him, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
McKinney issued a statement of regret for the incident but no apology. She and her lawyers have repeatedly declared that she was a victim of inappropriate touching and racism and said they were considering pursuing civil action against the officer.
She and her attorneys have refused to say whether she hit the officer as alleged. James Myart Jr., her lawyer, suggested in a CNN interview that McKinney had acted in self-defense ...
Quote:Report: McKinney Punches Cop
... Sources say that the officer was at a position in the Longworth House Office Building, and neither recognized McKinney, nor saw her credentials as she went around the metal detector.
The officer called out, "Ma'am, Ma'am," and walked after her in an attempt to stop her. When he caught McKinney, he grabbed her by the arm.
Witnesses say McKinney pulled her arm away, and with her cell phone in hand, punched the officer in the chest ...
And lets not overlook another Representative possibly engaging in Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Office on Rep. Mckinney's behalf:
Quote:McKinney Blames Police For Slapping Incident
... Channel 2 Action News has learned that Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA.) intervened when word got out Wednesday night that McKinney might be arrested.
She says she approached the House sergeant-at-arms to discuss the situation.
Millender-McDonald sits on the House committee that oversees the Capitol Hill police and the sergeant-at-arms' office.
Naturally, McKinney is playing the victim through all this, citing her gender and her ethnicity as the root causes of her abuse at the hand of Authority. And of course, Rep.
Millender-McDonald, who shares attributes beyond Party Affilliation with the unfortunate, oft-victimized Rep. McKinney, insists she did not "intervene", but rather that she merely wanted some questions answered.
Roxxx wrote:I just hope the poor, defenseless rent-a-cop is recuperating satisfactorily from this viscious attack!
Just FYI, The Capitol Police, of whom the officer in question are duly sworn, armed peace officers in Federal employ. Reservingg any judgement as to their relative qualifications by comparison with other police agencies, they are not "rent-a-cops" and by definition are Federal Peace Officers - which means that assaulting a member of The Capitol Police Department is a Federal crime. Also, to what extent, nor even whethe, the officer may have been injured is irrelevant to the core charge of assault.
Now, granted, Rep.McKinney so far has not been charged with anything, and any rush-to-judgemment is untoward. At this point, all we have is what has been reported, and a few soundbites from some of the interested parties, imparting whichever direction of spin as might be suitable to the agenda and partisan affilliation of the party playing to the cameras and microphones.