Democrat lawmaker attacks police officer

Setanta wrote:

Say, MM, you have still not either provided evidence that anyone whom you choose to describe as "those on the left" have applauded this woman, nor have you withdrawn that baseless contention.

Can one assume that forthright honesty is not one of your strong suits?

Honesty is my major value.

Those on the dem side as soon as the article was posted started saying she should have done what Bush or the repubs would have done.
So,since the dems are always attacking Bush,does that mean they applaud what Bush and Co have done,since they think she should have done the same things they hate Bush for doing?

Anon-Voter wrote:

I don't have it! I bet you do ... Why don't you post it so everyone knows what a mysogynist you are. You were real proud if it ... come on ... put it on here!!

Anon

It dissapeared with the death of Abuzz.
So,that means that you cannot show what you are talking about,or the context of what was written.
I would suggest you hold yourself to the same standards you hold everyone else to and drop it.

MM
Are you denying these posts that Anon speaks of?

OK,
Applause was the wrong word,support and approve of are better choices of words.

I repeat,who on here,besides me,has said that what she did was wrong?

If you dont think it was wrong,then you support what she did.

Remember,the left has used that same argument against the Bush supporters,so it holds true here also.

Personally, I think what she did was wrong. I don't like violence in any way shape or form.

Hey MM,

Jesus Son ... It just occurred to me ... are you a closet gay?? This is a great place to come out MM, I can't think of a more understanding place than this to help you come out and deal with any issues you may have!!

We're here for ya man!!

Anon

Besides misogyny, racism and blatant partisanship, what justifies wanting to throw the book at someone before even knowing all the facts of the case, before even formal charges have been levied.

Only a hateful, miserable, embittered, poor excuse of a human being would hold such a viewpoint.

mysteryman wrote:

OK,
Applause was the wrong word,support and approve of are better choices of words.

What evidence to you have that anyone here supports or approves of her action? Can you point to it in this or another thread?

Quote:

I repeat,who on here,besides me,has said that what she did was wrong?

Since when was agreeing with you, and rushing to say so, the criterion for demonstrating one's moral rectitude?

Quote:

If you dont think it was wrong,then you support what she did.

This is not axiomatic. Someone might consider it silly, or in poor taste, but not necessarily wrong--and therefore would no support her action. But, even if this statement were correct (and there is absolutely no reason to believe it is), what evidence do you have that anyone here doesn't think it was wrong?

Quote:

Remember,the left has used that same argument against the Bush supporters,so it holds true here also.

Before it was "on the dem side," now it's "the left." You need to define your terms, and to be specific for such a discussion to make rational sense. What you have done all along is to erect strawmen, which is to say, you have falsely characterized people's remarks, or you are putting words in people's mouths, in order to give you a position to argue.

Who here has used "the same argument against the Bush supporters?"

Wow another perfect example of attacking the thread starter. No one wants to debate. Attack after attack on MM 6 pages worth of attack and very little debate. Good to see nothing has changed in the time I have been gone. Keep up the bad work people of the left. Remember I am over seas to protect your ability to attack people you disagree with glad to know I'm working so hard for something so important.