1
   

Victory in Iraq is OURS!!!

 
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:35 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
au1929 wrote:
Brandon, Mcg.
Do you still believe that the invasion of Iraq was a necessary action.

Based on what was known then about Hussein's history with WMD, it was absolutely necessary, since a mad dictator cannot be trusted with doomsday weapons.



And you think that Mad King George can?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:46 am
McTag wrote:
Let's take it back a notch or two.

This isn't a war, it is an illegal invasion.


And an unnecessary one at that. Since in spite of Bush's, BS relative to WMDs. The inspections had pretty well established that there were none in Iraq. To this day I cannot understand what went on in the confused mind of Bush that prompted him to invade and brought us into this quagmire.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:52 am
McTag wrote:
Let's take it back a notch or two.

This isn't a war, it is an illegal invasion.

Historically, how many countries making war have sought approval or permission from the international community?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:53 am
au1929 wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
au1929 wrote:
Brandon, Mcg.
Do you still believe that the invasion of Iraq was a necessary action.

Based on what was known then about Hussein's history with WMD, it was absolutely necessary, since a mad dictator cannot be trusted with doomsday weapons.



And you think that Mad King George can?

Your statement does not logically negate my point.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:54 am
au1929 wrote:
McTag wrote:
Let's take it back a notch or two.

This isn't a war, it is an illegal invasion.


And an unnecessary one at that. Since in spite of Bush's, BS relative to WMDs. The inspections had pretty well established that there were none in Iraq. To this day I cannot understand what went on in the confused mind of Bush that prompted him to invade and brought us into this quagmire.

The desire to insure that the world would not be terrorized, and millions not killed, by a nuclear Saddam Hussein.
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:56 am
Brandon9000

Quote:
Pathetically, you see no distinction between Hussein intentionally killing every living thing in a town, and us killing some civilians by mistake as has occurred in every war since the dawn of time.


Would you care to provide evidence that Sadam intentionally killed every living thing in a town ?

and that Pentagon didn't intentionally destroy Iraq’s water-treatment systems ?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:57 am
Zippo wrote:
Quote:
Pathetically, you see no distinction between Hussein intentionally killing every living thing in a town, and us killing some civilians by mistake as has occurred in every war since the dawn of time.


Would you care to provide evidence that Sadam intentionally killed every living thing in a town ?

and that Pentagon didn't intentionally destroy Iraq's water-treatment systems ?

When you carpet bomb a town with chemical weapons, and block escape routes, you have sufficient information to know that women and children will die. Right or wrong?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 09:59 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
Zippo wrote:
Quote:
Pathetically, you see no distinction between Hussein intentionally killing every living thing in a town, and us killing some civilians by mistake as has occurred in every war since the dawn of time.


Would you care to provide evidence that Sadam intentionally killed every living thing in a town ?

and that Pentagon didn't intentionally destroy Iraq's water-treatment systems ?

When you carpet bomb a town with chemical weapons, and block escape routes, you have sufficient information to know that women and children will die. Right or wrong?


As opposed to dropping MOABs on civilians as Mass Murderer George W Bush did?
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:00 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
Zippo wrote:
Quote:
Pathetically, you see no distinction between Hussein intentionally killing every living thing in a town, and us killing some civilians by mistake as has occurred in every war since the dawn of time.


Would you care to provide evidence that Sadam intentionally killed every living thing in a town ?

and that Pentagon didn't intentionally destroy Iraq’s water-treatment systems ?

When you carpet bomb a town with chemical weapons, and block escape routes, you have sufficient information to know that women and children will die. Right or wrong?


Before i answer that can you provide proof that escape routes were/wern't blocked ?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:16 am
Wait a second!!! Only Brandon is allowed to ask people to prove things! LOL
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:25 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
Wilso wrote:
NickFun wrote:
Brandon, things were not so bad under Saddam for most folks. They had free health care, free schools, including college and homelessness did not exist. Thanks to us there are a million homeless, the schools are gone and no health care. These are things we don't read about here in the states.


Please don't damage the conservatives' fantasy world. They've got so little to hold onto.

Hold onto this. Had Hussein still been hiding his WMD as in the past, but just more cleverly, millions could later have died as a result. Anyone who doesn't try to defuse a ticking time bomb is a fool.


"We know they have WMD's, and we KNOW WHERE THEY ARE !!" George Bush in his usual state of ignorance!! Talk about "altered states" !!

Don't feel bad Brandon, George's Administration lie to him almost as much as they lie to you. He sucks it up, just like you do!! He thinks he's a great "War President", making up for his cowardice in his youth, and you think everyone is living in a democratic paradise where evrything is just wonderful. It's no surprise you are a supporter.

Anon
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:28 am
Zippo wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Zippo wrote:
Quote:
Pathetically, you see no distinction between Hussein intentionally killing every living thing in a town, and us killing some civilians by mistake as has occurred in every war since the dawn of time.


Would you care to provide evidence that Sadam intentionally killed every living thing in a town ?

and that Pentagon didn't intentionally destroy Iraq's water-treatment systems ?

When you carpet bomb a town with chemical weapons, and block escape routes, you have sufficient information to know that women and children will die. Right or wrong?


Before i answer that can you provide proof that escape routes were/wern't blocked ?


I can't specifically find it, but I did find this:

Quote:
A few minutes before the raids began an Iraqi artillery barrage had forced the residents out of their homes to where they would be most vulnerable to the instantaneous effects of the poisonous gases.

Source

and this general description:

Halabja

Now, do you deny that Saddam Hussein deliberately tried to cause as many deaths as possible, regardless of age, gender, or guilt for anything in Halabja?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:33 am
Anon-Voter wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
Wilso wrote:
NickFun wrote:
Brandon, things were not so bad under Saddam for most folks. They had free health care, free schools, including college and homelessness did not exist. Thanks to us there are a million homeless, the schools are gone and no health care. These are things we don't read about here in the states.


Please don't damage the conservatives' fantasy world. They've got so little to hold onto.

Hold onto this. Had Hussein still been hiding his WMD as in the past, but just more cleverly, millions could later have died as a result. Anyone who doesn't try to defuse a ticking time bomb is a fool.


"We know they have WMD's, and we KNOW WHERE THEY ARE !!" George Bush in his usual state of ignorance!! Talk about "altered states" !!

Don't feel bad Brandon, George's Administration lie to him almost as much as they lie to you. He sucks it up, just like you do!! He thinks he's a great "War President", making up for his cowardice in his youth, and you think everyone is living in a democratic paradise where evrything is just wonderful. It's no surprise you are a supporter.

Anon

You are ignoring what I said and simply repeating slogans and opinions which, true or false, have nothing to do with my assertion. The fact is that had Hussein been continuing to hide WMD and WMD development programs, as had been his habit for years, they might someday have been used to terrorize, the region, re-annex Kuwait or other countries, and he might have used them to kill millions. The invasion was necessary and appropriate. I'm ready for more slogans that don't negate or even relate to what I've said.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:34 am
McTag wrote:
Let's take it back a notch or two.

This isn't a war, it is an illegal invasion.


What's the matter with you fricking liberal style commie pinkos? This is a righteous war ... God is on out side, and we are the bastion of all that is good and bright!! Remember now! Mom, God, Apple Pie, Patriotism, Country, Democracy, Love! We are good ... we are good ... we are good ... ... ...

There will be a tape playing under your pillow while you sleep to help you with the brainwashing!! (this will not be required for the weak minded).

Anon
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 10:44 am
"We KNOW they have WMD's, and we KNOW WHERE THEY ARE !!"

We went to war and killed thousands of people with this SLOGAN!!
They continue to change the lies, and you continue to eat it up!!

I have no hope for you ever getting it right Brandon!!


Anon
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 11:00 am
http://www.dubyasworld.com/rummy-wmd-crystal-ball.jpg

"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."
--Donald Rumsfeld
On March 30, on alleged weapons of mass distruction in Iraq.

"I should have said, 'I believe they're in that area.' "
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 11:05 am
Quote:
Now, do you deny that Saddam Hussein deliberately tried to cause as many deaths as possible, regardless of age, gender, or guilt for anything in Halabja?


Nope not as "many deaths as possible" he only killed his enemy, just as Bush is trying to do, he's on trial, and now its Bush's turn.

Its hard to distinguish between the two.

http://www.geocities.com/latifyahia2001/BUSH.SADDAM.JPG

Similarities between Bush and Hussein

1. They are men, Bush born 1946, Hussein in either 1937 or 1939.

2. They are both presidents at the peak of their career; sooner rather than later, life is likely to go downwards for them.

3. They are likely to be concerned about their image in future history books.

4. They have children and marriages of long duration.

5. They believe in military strength as an important instrument in their exercising power and to achieve their nation's goals. They share the philosophy that "might makes right."

6. They have members of their own family involved in politics and make use of them.

7. They came to power without being democratically elected.

8. They strongly believe that they are themselves Good and that the other represents or is Evil.

9. They believe they have some kind of mission - namely to stand up to or eradicate Evil.

10. They are political fundamentalists in the sense that they believe that they are 100 per cent right and the other 100 per cent wrong, morally and otherwise.

11. They are both deeply religious personalities. Their God is guiding them, and in a crisis this God, and the mission He has handed down to them, becomes even more important.

12. A certain degree of macho attitudes. Saddam Hussein likes to be portrayed as physically strong, athletic and usually handling swords, guns and rifles. Bush doesn't match that but plays on being at the helm of the strongest military power in history.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 11:10 am
Zippo wrote:
Quote:
Now, do you deny that Saddam Hussein deliberately tried to cause as many deaths as possible, regardless of age, gender, or guilt for anything in Halabja?


Nope not as "many deaths as possible" he only killed his enemy, just as Bush is trying to do, he's on trial, and now its Bush's turn.

Its hard to distinguish between the two.

http://www.geocities.com/latifyahia2001/BUSH.SADDAM.JPG


Separated at birth!

Anon
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 11:10 am
We ALL know that OUR God can beat up THEIR God. This is why we must makes them all Christians and Republicans.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 12:16 pm
Violence After Mosque Attack Kills 111

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2006/02/23/international/i091412S16.DTL

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/24/iraq/main541815.shtml

Everybody have Happy Happy Positive thoughts now. This is just the horrible leftist press trying to be negative.

Everything is just fine and everyone is happy!! Be sure and smile, and above all, think happy happy thoughts and be positive!!

We're running reruns of "Mr. Roberts Neighborhood" at 6PM. Be sure and watch to see how things really are in Iraq!

Anon
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/09/2024 at 10:50:03