Clemency for Tookie?

Stevepax wrote:

....excellent health care....

outrageous. they should be worked to death in the service of the reich.

Schwarzenegger Stadium in Austria to be renamed: report
Dec 15, 2005, 13:47 GMT

Graz - The Arnold Schwarzenegger Football Stadium in Austria's second-largest city Graz is to be renamed as a sign of displeasure with the city's most famous son, a local newspaper reported Thursday. . . .

Debra, haha. Well beyond all that the really important sentence is this, Moratorium on Executions in California Proposed".

blueflame1 wrote:

Schwarzenegger Stadium in Austria to be renamed: report
Dec 15, 2005, 13:47 GMT

Graz - The Arnold Schwarzenegger Football Stadium in Austria's second-largest city Graz is to be renamed as a sign of displeasure with the city's most famous son, a local newspaper reported Thursday. . . .

Arnold is a buffoonish womanizing ego-maniac. Naming a sports stadium after him is small potatoes in comparison to giving him control over an entire state. The star-struck people who elected him to be the governor of California ought to have their heads examined.

I dont know but I hope it was determined solely on medical need, regardless of lifestyle factors or current place of residence.

Debra, haha. Well beyond all that the really important sentence is this, Moratorium on Executions in California Proposed".

oh let me answer cmon please let me let me I know.

It wasn't the law abiding citizen!

I bet it was the person who doesn't have to pay one cent for health care.
And, I love this, they couldn't execute him until AFTER the transplant. SOOOOOOOOOOOO not only did he do wrong in order to get the death penalty, he killed somebody else because he got the transplant when he knew he was going to be executed.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

I dont know but I hope it was determined solely on medical need, regardless of lifestyle factors or current place of residence.

Steve, you are indeed a humanitarian. I said both needed it or die. That's the medical need.

Stevepax wrote:

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

I dont know but I hope it was determined solely on medical need, regardless of lifestyle factors or current place of residence.

Steve, you are indeed a humanitarian. I said both needed it or die. That's the medical need.

But its never as simple as that is it Steve? One does not die as soon as the other gets the transplant. You are not physically killing someone by postponing the operation, unless of course you both deny the patient the transplant and strike him off the waiting list. Is that what happened?

so they saved one out of two desperately ill people. I'm glad. And sorry for the other.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

so they saved one out of two desperately ill people. I'm glad. And sorry for the other.

This is happening right now in Oregon.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=90611&page=1

There are pages of these if you search - transplant death row

PAGES!!

Sorry Steve, I am not the loving humanitarian you are. I think the guy that obeys the law, pays taxes his whole life, and is a good citizen should get the call! I guess I'm just old fashioned.

The fault is not that the prisoner gets a kidney transplant when he needs one but rather under the primitive American healthcare system, many poor people cant afford the insurance to get themselves on the waiting list. That is the real outrage. Take your anger out on that injustice, not the prison inmate.