Worst Speech of Bush's Presidency

I am sure that Old Europe and AU1929 appear to know almost nothing about intelligence scores. I am sure they don't know where a 120 IQ puts a person on the normal curve.

That's fine. No one defeats me. Not in the long run, Old Europe...

dead cats are best stacked like firewood and left to cure before casting in the fire, you get a higher BTU output.

My name is Moretkat. That's what I expect to be called.

Thank you.

I find the left wingers on this thread to be loquacious but lacking in facts.

l. George W. Bush was not wiped out in the debates with the policy wonk, Al Gore. No one has attempted to explain that. If Bush were indeed so inarticulate, how could he have had three debates with the most articulate Gore and not be defeated.

Not even Joe from Chicago will touch that one. He can't find the answer in his law crib notes.

2. Many of the people writing on these threads have taken the SAT test. George Bush took the SAT test. Those who do fairly well on the SAT are not necessarily articulate, but I am certain there is a correlation.

How did George W. Bush do on his SAT's? He scored 120.

Who is Bill Bradley? Former Senator Bradley!!! He ran in the 1990 Presidential Primaries. He was also a RHODES SCHOLAR!!!!

How did he do on his SAT? He scored LOWER than President George W. Bush did on the verbal section.

As I said, Joe from Chicago and others write nothing but generalizations. They have no facts. Chew on the facts above. Rebut them if you wish to try. They will stand because they are accurate.

I am sure that Old Europe and AU1929 appear to know almost nothing about intelligence scores. I am sure they don't know where a 120 IQ puts a person on the normal curve.

Of course, there are people who have higher IQ's than Bush but a high IQ does not mean that they will be good leaders.

Who had a higher IQ than Bill Clinton?

Yet, the famous presidential scholar, Dr. Fred I. Greenstein from Princeton who is an authority on leadership, wrote:

"The politically gifted ,EMOTIONALLY CHALLENGED William Jefferson Clinton provides yet another indication of the fundamental importance of EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE in the modern presidency>"

Mortkatwrote:

Quote:

My name is Moretkat. That's what I expect to be called.

Thank you.

If your name is Moretkat, then you should change your username since it shows as Mortkat.

flushd wrote:

GW does not have a gift for words. Neither do his writers.

Well then, I must ask is this your way of saying he is actually a genius? Think about it. On one hand he referred to as not being at all bright and then we are told (by you) that neither he nor his writers have a gift for words. Now, whereas this may in some way be true (at least to the uninformed); it begs the question as to how pathetic the writers for the other side must be since George Bush won two consecutive elections. Even if one wants to dispute the first election victory, the fact is he won the 2004 election and at that point in time people had heard him a number of times. People had seen him in action and yet they voted for him again any way. According to your (and others) dim assessment of President Bush this would then say that the people themselves are dumber than sticks since it was the people who voted for George Bush.

I submit to you that George Bush is quite intelligent, bordering on genius level and it is this fact which scares the masses of negative nellies from the left. You are terrified by the idea that someone has finally presented real and legitimate solutions to the world's problems...how will you sleep at night once world peace and harmony are in place?