1
   

Worst Speech of Bush's Presidency

 
 
englishmajor
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Nov, 2005 11:35 pm
au1929 wrote:
Sturgis
The war was elective and unjustified. As a matter of fact the war in Iraq has increased the danger of terrorist attacks. Since it is both a recruiting tool and training ground for terrorists.
Regarding your patriotic diatribe. To fight and if need be die in the defense of ones nation is noble. To fight and die in an elective war started by our idiot president is not. One would think we had learned our. lesson in Viet Nam.


Au -regardless of how you feel about me being a Canadian I must agree with you here. Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam........

You won't change Sturgis' mind on a forum. What will change his mind is when martial law begins......sometime around when conscription begins and no one signs up. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2005 12:21 pm
Sturgis- It would appear that AU1929 either has a bad memory or is unwilling to state the truth.

As a matter of fact, Clinton was the one who hurled missles at Iraq in a preventive strike withou t consulting Congress.

Does AU1929 "forget" that CONGRESS, yes CONGRESS gave President Bush the authority on Oct. 10th and 11th , 2001,in a bi-partisan vote to "ATTACK IRAQ UNILATERALLY".

AU1929 says that the war increased the danger of terrorist attacks.

I don't know how he can say that since he does not know how many terrorist attacks there would have been if we had not gone into Iraq.

He forgets the Cole and other incidents prior to the attacks.

I do know of one attack, Sturgis. Most people seem to have forgotten that 3,000 of our fellow citizens were crushed or burned alive in the WTC. I don't know how the "danger" of that "terrorist attack" was increased by our presence in Iraq since we were not there.

I also know something else, Sturgis. There have been no more terrorist attacks in the USA.

Perhaps AU1929 doesn't care about that but I do.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2005 11:19 pm
Quote:
I also know something else, Sturgis. There have been no more terrorist attacks in the USA.


Why is that? Here's my guess. The gang which conducted the three terror attacks on 11th September didn't believe that the US and its friends would go after them in Afghanistan. But they did. They went right after them. And rightly so and what a smart policy it was. I can imagine bin Laden sitting in his cave crapping himself wondering what was about to happen next as the full strength of the West went after him and the murdering bastards he associated with. He was in the grasp of the West and then...and then...some idiots in the White House decided it would be good to invade Iraq.
0 Replies
 
englishmajor
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Nov, 2005 11:22 pm
Yeah, well, Clinton ruined a dress.

Bush ruined a nation.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 03:45 am
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
He once gave a good speech? Shocked Confused

Laughing
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 07:32 am
Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground



War Created Haven, CIA Advisers Report

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 14, 2005; Page A01



Iraq has replaced Afghanistan as the training ground for the next generation of "professionalized" terrorists, according to a report released yesterday by the National Intelligence Council, the CIA director's think tank.

Iraq provides terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills," said David B. Low, the national intelligence officer for transnational threats. "There is even, under the best scenario, over time, the likelihood that some of the jihadists who are not killed there will, in a sense, go home, wherever home is, and will therefore disperse to various other countries."
Low's comments came during a rare briefing by the council on its new report on long-term global trends. It took a year to produce and includes the analysis of 1,000 U.S. and foreign experts. Within the 119-page report is an evaluation of Iraq's new role as a breeding ground for Islamic terrorists.

President Bush has frequently described the Iraq war as an integral part of U.S. efforts to combat terrorism. But the council's report suggests the conflict has also helped terrorists by creating a haven for them in the chaos of war.

"At the moment," NIC Chairman Robert L. Hutchings said, Iraq "is a magnet for international terrorist activity."

Before the U.S. invasion, the CIA said Saddam Hussein had only circumstantial ties with several al Qaeda members. Osama bin Laden rejected the idea of forming an alliance with Hussein and viewed him as an enemy of the jihadist movement because the Iraqi leader rejected radical Islamic ideals and ran a secular government.

Bush described the war in Iraq as a means to promote democracy in the Middle East. "A free Iraq can be a source of hope for all the Middle East," he said one month before the invasion. "Instead of threatening its neighbors and harboring terrorists, Iraq can be an example of progress and prosperity in a region that needs both."

But as instability in Iraq grew after the toppling of Hussein, and resentment toward the United States intensified in the Muslim world, hundreds of foreign terrorists flooded into Iraq across its unguarded borders. They found tons of unprotected weapons caches that, military officials say, they are now using against U.S. troops. Foreign terrorists are believed to make up a large portion of today's suicide bombers, and U.S. intelligence officials say these foreigners are forming tactical, ever-changing alliances with former Baathist fighters and other insurgents.

"The al-Qa'ida membership that was distinguished by having trained in Afghanistan will gradually dissipate, to be replaced in part by the dispersion of the experienced survivors of the conflict in Iraq," the report says.

According to the NIC report, Iraq has joined the list of conflicts -- including the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate, and independence movements in Chechnya, Kashmir, Mindanao in the Philippines, and southern Thailand -- that have deepened solidarity among Muslims and helped spread radical Islamic ideology.

At the same time, the report says that by 2020, al Qaeda "will be superseded" by other Islamic extremist groups that will merge with local separatist movements. Most terrorism experts say this is already well underway. The NIC says this kind of ever-morphing decentralized movement is much more difficult to uncover and defeat.

Terrorists are able to easily communicate, train and recruit through the Internet, and their threat will become "an eclectic array of groups, cells and individuals that do not need a stationary headquarters," the council's report says. "Training materials, targeting guidance, weapons know-how, and fund-raising will become virtual (i.e. online)."

The report, titled "Mapping the Global Future," highlights the effects of globalization and other economic and social trends. But NIC officials said their greatest concern remains the possibility that terrorists may acquire biological weapons and, although less likely, a nuclear device.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7460-2005Jan13.html
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 07:52 am
Mortkat
Congress gave authorization based on the a stack of misinformation. It also was based upon the premise that invasion was to be as a last resort. Was it? Not by any stretch of the imagination. An attack was the plan of this administration from the outset.
Initially the threat of attack was based on the refusal to allow inspectors and inspections to continue. Since that was no longer a valid argument, inspectors were in place. The Next cry was the presence of WMD's and the facilities to manufacture. The Inspectors were putting a lie to that. Then the last cry was Saddam and his sons had "24 hours to get out of Iraq" What right do you think Bush and the US had to make that demand.
In that regard the world over would make that demand of Bush if they thought they could make it stick.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 08:14 am
Wilso wrote:
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
He once gave a good speech? Shocked Confused

Laughing


Stands to reason...considering he is now being targeted for the worst speech of his Presidency. Interesting thing about that...it is called the worst speech of his Presidency. Well two things here...every President has a best speech and a worst speech...Clinton, Ford,Carter, Roosevelt (both Teddy and Franklin), Truman, Wilson, Grant, etc. and the mere fact that it is listed as Bush's worst. Two things on that...he has some 3 years left so if this is his worst, what the hey, it can be over looked and lastly it does not find itself compared to the speeches of other Presidents which may have been even worse. Anyone ever here the blathering in that Gettysburg Address? Talk about long winded....
Look the point is, that every politician has good and bad speeches.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 08:27 am
Sturgis wrote:
Stands to reason...considering he is now being targeted for the worst speech of his Presidency. Interesting thing about that...it is called the worst speech of his Presidency. Well two things here...every President has a best speech and a worst speech...Clinton, Ford,Carter, Roosevelt (both Teddy and Franklin), Truman, Wilson, Grant, etc. and the mere fact that it is listed as Bush's worst. Two things on that...he has some 3 years left so if this is his worst, what the hey, it can be over looked and lastly it does not find itself compared to the speeches of other Presidents which may have been even worse.

I'm confused. Are we supposed to be looking for two things or three things or four things or five things? The suspense is unbearable.

Sturgis wrote:
Anyone ever here the blathering in that Gettysburg Address? Talk about long winded....

The Gettysburg Address contains 272 words. It took about two minutes to deliver. Lincoln's speech was preceded by an oration deliverd by Edward Everett that lasted over two hours.

Describing the Gettysburg Address as "long winded," then, makes about as much sense as describing George W. Bush as "articulate."

Sturgis wrote:
Look the point is, that every politician has good and bad speeches.

I hereby declare that, from this day forth, this revelation shall be known throughout the land as "Sturgis's First Law of Political Rhetoric."
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 10:22 am
Sturgis- You are cooked. You have run into the most brilliant lawyer of our time- Joe from Chicago.

Joe says he is confused. He is. Frequenly.

I want to see what Joe says when the House and the Senate remain in Republican hands in 2006.

I don't know, Strugis, what Joe's training is like but it is certain that they did not teach him that the ideological leanings of the Supreme Court is one of the most important elements in crafting the future of our society. Joe from Chicago must have missed the nomination and appointment made from the man who gave the "poor" speeches< George W. Bush. He must have missed the fact that now, there is a brilliant non-leftist as Chief Judge. He must also be unconscious of the forthcoming appointment of another non-leftist-Judge Alito.

Let the left attempt to denigrate President Bush's speeches. It means nothing. What is important is Roberts, Alito, and perhaps? a replacement for another USSC judge before 2008. Stevens is quite elderly.

And, Sturgis, the left has made no comment about another very very important appointment made by George Bush--The appointment of Dr. Ben Bernanke( One of the President's Economic Advisors) as the Fed. Chief. Maybe they didn't teach Joe from Chicago that this position is far more important to the direction of the economy than anyone who has the presidency.


Bernanke will serve for four years until Hillary does not reappoint him and appoints some lesbian from Yale University.

I hereby declare that "Sturgis' First Law of Political Rhetoric" be supplanted by Joe from Chicago's Law of Left Wing Political Blindness.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 03:07 pm
Bush Rewrites History to Criticize His Anti-War Critics




http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/111505G.shtml
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 05:12 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Sturgis wrote:
... Interesting thing about that...it is called the worst speech of his Presidency. Well two things here...every President has a best speech and a worst speech...Clinton, Ford,Carter, Roosevelt (both Teddy and Franklin), Truman, Wilson, Grant, etc. and the mere fact that it is listed as Bush's worst. Two things on that...he has some 3 years left so if this is his worst, what the hey, it can be over looked and lastly it does not find itself compared to the speeches of other Presidents which may have been even worse.

I'm confused. Are we supposed to be looking for two things or three things or four things or five things? The suspense is unbearable. read more carefully Joe...I said two things and then on the second item I referred to items directly related to the second item after which I had an afterthought which was directly related to all the preceding thoughts therefore there truly were only two things mentioned.
Sturgis wrote:
Anyone ever here the blathering in that Gettysburg Address? Talk about long winded....

The Gettysburg Address contains 272 words. It took about two minutes to deliver. Lincoln's speech was preceded by an oration delivered by Edward Everett that lasted over two hours.

Describing the Gettysburg Address as "long winded," then, makes about as much sense as describing George W. Bush as "articulate."
Interesting take however I must insist that I am right. What really and truly bothers me even more here Joe is that you missed my spelling error when I asked 'anyone here the blathering' If you had been paying attention, you'd have realized the correct spelling should have been hear
Sturgis wrote:
Look the point is, that every politician has good and bad speeches.

I hereby declare that, from this day forth, this revelation shall be known throughout the land as "Sturgis's First Law of Political Rhetoric."
Wow, I'm famous!

And one more thing...I find President Bush to be quite articulate.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 05:19 pm
Sturgis wrote

Quote:
And one more thing...I find President Bush to be quite articulate.

Duh! In what language??
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 05:24 pm
English.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 06:11 pm
Yeah, here he is, being articulate in English.


http://www.ebaumsworld.com/bush-bs.html
0 Replies
 
englishmajor
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 08:10 pm
snood wrote:
Yeah, here he is, being articulate in English.


http://www.ebaumsworld.com/bush-bs.html


Yeah Laughing Laughing at least he's amusing, if nothing else! Articulate? Naw. Here are some more side busters -

"I think it's important to bring somebody from outside the system, the judicial system, somebody that hasn't been on the bench and, therefore, there's not a lot of opinions for people to look at." ?-George W. Bush, on the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, Washington, D.C., October 4, 2005

"We look forward to hearing your vision, so we can more better do our job. That's what I'm telling you." ?-George W. Bush, Gulfport, Miss., Sept. 20, 2005

"If it were to rain a lot, there is concern from the Army Corps of Engineers that the levees might break. And so, therefore, we're cautious about encouraging people to return at this moment of history." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2005

"Listen, I want to thank leaders of the ?- in the faith ?- faith-based and community-based community for being here." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 6, 2005

"So please give cash money to organizations that are directly involved in helping save lives ?- save the life who had been affected by Hurricane Katrina." ?-George W. Bush, Washington D.C., Sept. 6, 2005

"I can't wait to join you in the joy of welcoming neighbors back into neighborhoods, and small businesses up and running, and cutting those ribbons that somebody is creating new jobs." ?-George W. Bush, Poplarville, Miss., Sept. 5, 2005

"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job." ?-George W. Bush, to FEMA director Michael Brown, who resigned 10 days later amid criticism over his job performance, Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005 (Listen to audio; read more stupid quotes about Hurricane Katrina)

"We've got a lot of rebuilding to do. First, we're going to save lives and stabilize the situation. And then we're going to help these communities rebuild. The good news is -- and it's hard for some to see it now -- that out of this chaos is going to come a fantastic Gulf Coast, like it was before. Out of the rubbles of Trent Lott's house -- he's lost his entire house -- there's going to be a fantastic house. And I'm looking forward to sitting on the porch." (Laughter) --George W. Bush, touring hurricane damage, Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005

"My thoughts are, we're going to get somebody who knows what they're talking about when it comes to rebuilding cities." ?-George W. Bush, on rebuilding New Orleans, Biloxi, Miss., Sept. 2, 2005

"Americans should be prudent in their use of energy during the course of the next few weeks. Don't buy gas if you don't need it." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1, 2005

"It's totally wiped out. ... It's devastating, it's got to be doubly devastating on the ground." ?-George W. Bush, turning to his aides while surveying Hurricane Katrina flood damage from Air Force One , Aug. 31, 2005

"The best place for the facts to be done is by somebody who's spending time investigating it." ?-George W. Bush, on the probe into how CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity was leaked, Washington D.C., July 18, 2005

"I'm looking forward to a good night's sleep on the soil of a friend." ?-George W. Bush, on visiting Denmark, Washington D.C., June 29, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?" ?-George W. Bush to Jean-Claude Juncker, prime minister of Luxembourg, Washington, D.C., June 20, 2005
Got a Bushism?
Send it to [email protected]

Email This Page to a Friend

"The relations with, uhh ?- Europe are important relations, and they've, uhh ?- because, we do share values. And, they're universal values, they're not American values or, you know ?- European values, they're universal values. And those values ?- uhh ?- being universal, ought to be applied everywhere." ?-George W. Bush, at a press conference with European Union dignitaries, Washington, D.C., June 20, 2005

"You see, not only did the attacks help accelerate a recession, the attacks reminded us that we are at war." ?-George W. Bush, on the Sept. 11 attacks, Washington, D.C., June 8, 2005

"And the second way to defeat the terrorists is to spread freedom. You see, the best way to defeat a society that is ?- doesn't have hope, a society where people become so angry they're willing to become suiciders, is to spread freedom, is to spread democracy." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., June 8, 2005
"It seemed like to me they based some of their decisions on the word of ?- and the allegations ?- by people who were held in detention, people who hate America, people that had been trained in some instances to disassemble ?- that means not tell the truth." ?-George W. Bush, on an Amnesty International report on prisoner abuse at Guantanamo Bay, Washington, D.C., May 31, 2005 (Listen to audio)

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." ?-George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005 (Listen to audio)

"We discussed the way forward in Iraq, discussed the importance of a democracy in the greater Middle East in order to leave behind a peaceful tomorrow." ?-George W. Bush, Tbilisi, Georgia, May 10, 2005

"I think younger workers ?- first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government ?- promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 4, 2005

"It means your own money would grow better than that which the government can make it grow. And that's important." ?-George W. Bush, on what private accounts could do for Social Security funds, Falls Church, Va., April 29, 2005


"I can only speak to myself." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"It's in our country's interests to find those who would do harm to us and get them out of harm's way." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"We expect the states to show us whether or not we're achieving simple objectives ?- like literacy, literacy in math, the ability to read and write." ?-George W. Bush, on federal education requirements, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"He understands the need for a timely write of the constitution." ?-George W. Bush, on Prime Minister Iyad Allawi of Iraq, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"Well, we've made the decision to defeat the terrorists abroad so we don't have to face them here at home. And when you engage the terrorists abroad, it causes activity and action." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"But Iraq has ?- have got people there that are willing to kill, and they're hard-nosed killers. And we will work with the Iraqis to secure their future." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"I appreciate my love for Laura." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 20, 2005

"We have enough coal to last for 250 years, yet coal also prevents an environmental challenge." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 20, 2005

"Part of the facts is understanding we have a problem, and part of the facts is what you're going to do about it." ?-George W. Bush, Kirtland, Ohio, April 15, 2005

"I'm going to spend a lot of time on Social Security. I enjoy it. I enjoy taking on the issue. I guess, it's the Mother in me." ?-George W. Bush, Washington D.C., April 14, 2005

"We look forward to analyzing and working with legislation that will make ?- it would hope ?- put a free press's mind at ease that you're not being denied information you shouldn't see." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 14, 2005

"I want to thank you for the importance that you've shown for education and literacy." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 13, 2005

"I understand there's a suspicion that we?-we're too security-conscience." ?-George W. Bush, Washington D.C., April 14, 2005

"If they pre-decease or die early, there's an asset base to be able to pass on to a loved one." ?-George W. Bush, on Social Security money held in private accounts, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, March 30, 2005

[I'm] occasionally reading, I want you to know, in the second term." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"In this job you've got a lot on your plate on a regular basis; you don't have much time to sit around and wander, lonely, in the Oval Office, kind of asking different portraits, 'How do you think my standing will be?'" ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"In terms of timetables, as quickly as possible ?- whatever that means." ?-George W. Bush, on his time frame for shoring up Social Security, Washington D.C., March 16, 2005

"I like the idea of people running for office. There's a positive effect when you run for office. Maybe some will run for office and say, vote for me, I look forward to blowing up America. I don't know, I don't know if that will be their platform or not. But it's -- I don't think so. I think people who generally run for office say, vote for me, I'm looking forward to fixing your potholes, or making sure you got bread on the table." ?-George W. Bush, on elections in the Middle East, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"I repeat, personal accounts do not permanently fix the solution." ?-George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table." ?-George W. Bush, Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005

"If you're a younger person, you ought to be asking members of Congress and the United States Senate and the president what you intend to do about it. If you see a train wreck coming, you ought to be saying, what are you going to do about it, Mr. Congressman, or Madam Congressman?" ?-George W. Bush, Detroit, Mich., Feb. 8, 2005

"Because the ?- all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those ?- changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be ?- or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the ?- like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate ?- the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those ?- if that growth is affected, it will help on the red." ?-George W. Bush, explaining his plan to save Social Security, Tampa, Fla., Feb. 4, 2005

"You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." ?-George W. Bush, to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005 (Listen to audio)

"After all, Europe is America's closest ally." ?-George W. Bush, Mainz, Germany, Feb. 23, 2005

"I'm also mindful that man should never try to put words in God's mouth. I mean, we should never ascribe natural disasters or anything else to God. We are in no way, shape, or form should a human being, play God." ?-George W. Bush, ABC's 20/20, Washington D.C., Jan. 14, 2005

"I want to appreciate those of you who wear our nation's uniform for your sacrifice." ?-George W. Bush, Jacksonville, Fla., Jan. 14, 2005


"I speak plainly sometimes, but you've got to be mindful of the consequences of the words. So put that down. I don't know if you'd call that a confession, a regret, something." ?-George W. Bush, speaking to reporters, Washington, D.C., Jan. 14, 2005

"Who could have possibly envisioned an erection ?- an election in Iraq at this point in history?" ?-George W. Bush, at the white House, Washington, D.C., Jan. 10, 2005

"We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." ?-George W. Bush, Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005

"I believe we are called to do the hard work to make our communities and quality of life a better place." ?-George W. Bush, Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005
Laughing Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Nov, 2005 08:24 pm
Sturgis- We find, again and again, that President Bush is not articulate. The left wing tells us that.

I have a great deal of trouble believing that.

When one of the most well informed policy wonks in the USA, namely, Al Gore, met the "inarticulate" George W. Bush, Gore should have destroyed him.

He did not. In fact, most of the pundits ruled that the THREE DEBATES WERE A DRAW.


How could this be? The policy wonk Al Gore was unable to destroy the "inarticulate" one??

Actually, Al Gore failed more subjects in College than George W. Bush did.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 01:42 am
Sturgis wrote:
read more carefully Joe...I said two things and then on the second item I referred to items directly related to the second item after which I had an afterthought which was directly related to all the preceding thoughts therefore there truly were only two things mentioned.

Yeah, right.

Sturgis wrote:
Interesting take however I must insist that I am right. What really and truly bothers me even more here Joe is that you missed my spelling error when I asked 'anyone here the blathering' If you had been paying attention, you'd have realized the correct spelling should have been hear[/i]

Unless they're particularly funny, I rarely if ever point out spelling mistakes. I understand that people make mistakes, and that zeroing in on spelling errors is a rather low form of criticism. But that shouldn't stop you from continuing to highlight your own shortcomings.

Sturgis wrote:
Wow, I'm famous!

And one more thing...I find President Bush to be quite articulate.

I didn't think anyone could do a worse job of defending your positions than you, Sturgis. Then I read Mortogato's post, and I realized that it was possible. And then I read this post of yours, and it was clear that you had taken the lead again.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 02:17 am
Sturgis wrote:


And one more thing...I find President Bush to be quite articulate.


Wow! Of all the ridiculous posts I've ever seen, this is so far the absolute winner. That stuttering chimp faced halfwit can't string more than five words together without a script and a two hour rehearsal. What rock are you living under?
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 06:34 am
GW does not have a gift for words. Neither do his writers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/16/2026 at 03:59:21