Chrissee wrote:Chrissee wrote:Bella Dea wrote:You are right Chrissee I do have a problem with you. You are rude to people. You whine. You complain. You make every attempt to make people dislike you. And you probably dont have pm privledges (sic) because you don't deserve them.
You want to talk about me, say it to my face (or screen name). Or is that too direct?
Actually, I would be glad to tell you what I think of you to your face. Where do you live? Or I can tell you next time you are in San Francisco. Deal?
I am not here to make friends, although over the years, I have met quite a few people from forums. People I meet find that I am just as I present myself. (of course, the people who meet me understand my rap.)
Unlike most people who post, I am a real person, not an anonymous entity behind a screen name and misleading avatar. I really do live in Twin Peaks near The Castro and if you were to hang out here, there is a good chance you would run into me and recognize me.
Bumping til I get an answer. It is a beautiful evening in San Fancisco. See you all later.
Bella said
Quote:You want to talk about me, say it to my face
The post was directed at Bella Dea. The person posting as BD challenged me. I accepted. Anytime, hon.
Chrissee wrote:The post was directed at Bella Dea. The person posting as BD challenged me. I accepted. Anytime, hon.
She asked you to direct your comments to her screen name ... her
virtual face.
woman eating man haters
>sigh<
Chrissee wrote:
I would love to send you my thoughts concerning this entity called Bella whatever.
My "challenge" (
) was in response to this comment. I'd appreciate you talking to me if you have something to say.
Also, should I ever make it across the country to SF, you can be assured that I wouldn't waste my time finding you.
Bella Dea wrote:Also, should I ever make it across the country to SF, you can be assured that I wouldn't waste my time finding you.
Wow! Making it across the country is a big deal for you. The point is you would be able to find me, just as I present myself as opposed to an anonymous entity hiding behind a misleading avatar.
I don't want to socialize with you either but you wanted me to say something to your face, that's pretty hard to do on the internet. OTOH It would be worth it to me to see you to satisfy my curiousity and confirm my read on you.
If you want to discuss my read on you, pm me an e-mail address.
If you two broads have a pillow fight in your underwear, please post pictures.
you want to see a goth girl in dirty panties?
or sexy bella in nothing.....
Goth Girl vs. the Unknown Imaginary Sexy Only in Cyberspace Entity (Is it live or is it Memorex?) coming to a drive-in near you.
Yashika Samurami as Goth Girl and Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Unknown Imaginary Sexy Only in Cyberspace Entity
Chrissee wrote:Goth girl?
I think she might have been saying that
your avatar looks more like one of the works of Edvard Munch that someone
real.
Funny, I have some dear friends that live in the Castro and have been down "your way" quite often. I never, ever remenber seeing you though. Guess you don't stand out that much after all
Lady J wrote:Chrissee wrote:Goth girl?
I think she might have been saying that
your avatar looks more like one of the works of Edvard Munch that someone
real.
Funny, I have some dear friends that live in the Castro and have been down "your way" quite often. I never, ever remenber seeing you though. Guess you don't stand out that much after all
Oh you are far too kind. Although I wasn't really looking for a Munch look when I edited that photo. Sometimes I go for Munch, sometimes Nrman Rockwell.
The fact that you haven't seen me means nothing except that our paths haven't crossed.
Norman Rockwell
Munch
Then there is this, from the House of Blues, New Orleans
Chrissee wrote:
The fact that you haven't seen me means nothing except that our paths haven't crossed.
Nothing gets by you, does it
?
Why when I try to access this site from my emale site does able2 tell me this site is invalid or dosent exist. Has one of the conseratives figured how to deny access to this site?
If you ask this question in Forum Help you are more likely to get a useful answer.
To return to the subject.....
I first read of the link between alcohol use and falls in the home when the actor William Holden died. First it was reported that he died from a fall, then it came out that he was drunk when it happened. The authorities say that when somebody dies from a fall in their home, it usually is associated with alcholol or drug use. That was the first I learned of the link.
Now, William Holden was quite elderly when he fell. Yet, even old people, whose reflexes have deteriorated, manage to get through the day without falling and injuring themselves. It takes alcohol or drugs to inhibit their remaining reflexes enough for them to get injured.
Bush entered the White House in his early fifties. He played intramural sports in college, which doesn't make him a great athlete but which probably puts him above average in reflexes and coordination. He takes great pride in his physical fitness, letting the world know his exercise routine, etc.
To the people on this thread who find Bush's two falls in the White House the first year unconvincing evidence that he was hitting the bottle: why? If even the elderly generally require the addition of alcohol or drugs to impede their reflexes before they get injured from falls, how can you NOT be suspicious a physically fit man in his early fifties is hitting the sauce if he ends up with injuries in the home when he happened to be alone?
And if Bush did go back to the bottle in the first year of his presidency, that would explain why the lengthy and frequent trips to Crawford, where his support systems surround him and possbily treatment can take place inconspicuously.
I'm really surprised that people are not putting two and two together.
