candidone1 wrote:DontTreadOnMe wrote:candidone1 wrote:You may have missed the subtlty in my last response. This is not about me, and continuing this inherently flawed reasoning bring about ounly one conclusion: You are merely reciting what little you claim to know while steadfastly capping each post off with an ad hominem rebut.
If that's how you discuss politics, then you're not worth the time it takes to reply.
well of course it is, candid. after all,
your list is silly. that means, it's , uh, uhh, a.. a silly list. and defending america against silly lists is
hard work.
:wink:
Tsk, tsk...them dern silly lists!
BUt DTOM, it's soo much easier easier to just insult the person.
I may disagree with Rayban, Brandon, Tico et al frequently....but at least they are capable of so much more than Rex's drivel....and if/when they do toss out the occasional ad hominem, it's either warrented or tongue in cheek.
Can't be bothered to continue this senseless volley.
easy there, yer gonna force us back on topic...
this week it does seem like the spin-o-matic has been spending time, um,
interpreting the president's remarks.
it's so bizarre. "he says what he means and means what he says". and yet everytime i turn around, there's somebody translating what he said and what he meant by it.
now
that's a mixed message if i ever got one.
it really doesn't help that he's using the same rhetoric that he started up with on iraq. even if he is being honest and sincere, it's still pretty confusing.
no wonder the country has gone full on neurotic.
