DontTreadOnMe wrote:so what do you want? to invade every country with nuclear energy ?
in that case, let's start with pakistan, who just tested a new cruise missle capable of delivering conventional and nuclear war heads up to 300 miles. or is that okay ? because "they're on our side" ?
how about israel ? they have nukes and are in violation of the u.n.'s orders. shouldn't we attack them in order to promote stability in the region?
how about india. how do you think they get tandoori to come out that unnatural pink color ? that's right, NUKES.
bush needs to shut the hell up. everytime he starts running his maul he just makes s**t worse.
It is known through intelligence that Iran has supplied terrorists with many if not most of the weapons in their arsenal.
Just two days ago Rumsfeld stated that we were fighting terrorists in Iraq who were armed with Iranian weapons...
This is cold hard facts based on real evidence... the weapons found on the battle field.
If Iran cannot keep hold of their weapons and if they are easily falling into the hands of terrorists then what guarantee do we have that they can keep hold of their WMD?