1
   

Terrorism by anti war protesters

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 04:39 pm
And I say some of anti-peace people can be terrorists in the short duration of time.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 04:48 pm
I do not think "anti-peace" people exist. Your statement is vacuous.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 04:56 pm
Vacuous - that's a good one - Kinda like "we're gonna fight this war for the peace" ROTFLMAO
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 05:03 pm
In any case, every professional, including Iraqis of course, of war has studied the experience of the Viet Nam War and the mass movements world-wide related with it. Military (of Iraq) is expecting the mass movements in its merit, and calculating them as a strategy.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 05:05 pm
Being naive about international politics is very dangerous.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 05:11 pm
Nothing is the same, nothing follows predictions, everything needs to be treated as the first time or you maybe caught in a box you can not get out of. However, in the case at hand - overwelming might against a vastly inferior foe without the advantage of wilderness and the avenues of explotable free zones (ie, Cambodia and Laos) is a for gone conclusion. The only victory to Iraq will be that it wasn't a roll over as predicted!
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 05:16 pm
Another lesson from the Viet Nam War is the strength of mass movements as a strategy, from both or multilateral view points.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 05:19 pm
You must be careful about exerting the strength learned.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 09:55 pm
This kind of mentality leads to terrorism.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82532,00.html
0 Replies
 
mamajuana
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:36 pm
Tartarin - I know Bush claimed Spanish (which is a joke) - but I'm sure he never learned verguenzas (shame), or verdad (truth).

I'm not even sure he knows what hombre means.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:37 pm
There is always one in every crowd satt - I don't really believe he is taken seriously, at least not by me. Terrorism? - well, he is looking for a new job about right now!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:39 pm
mama, I'm pretty sure he doesn't understand the word "amigo." c.i.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 10:44 pm
I hope the war will cease soon for everybody, "soon" especially for those in anti-war movements.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:46 pm
satt, soon is for everybody - especially for the troops!
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 01:26 am
The full resolution is still not loadable on UN web, but there are information now about the humanitarian relief program
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 02:39 am
"Annan, the United States and Britain had asked the council to ensure that nearly $10 billion in goods Iraq ordered and already approved, including $2.4 billion for food, can enter the country when conditions allow."

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-iraq-un.html
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 02:59 am
BillW..

"soon is for everybody - especially for the troops!"

Well said, they will be campared to brave Socrates in the Campaign of Potidea by Athens (432 BCE).
0 Replies
 
BillyFalcon
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 07:51 am
I scanned all the postings and saw no reference to the difference between passive and active civil disobedience. I think the distinction is very important.
Active means doing something , acting, functioning, moving.
Passive means offering no opposition or resistance, submissive, yielding.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 08:03 am
BillyFalcon
Have no idea what your point is. But since you mention it is lying down in the road and causing disruption active or passive. I should think active.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 08:52 am
I think so au. Detestable protest is destroying fixed structures - the only aim should be to change mental structures!

Read a quote last night, wish I had got it down but it went something like:

Regardless of what side you are on you meet people on your side who you wish were on the other side! Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Terrorism by anti war protesters
  3. » Page 7
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/31/2024 at 10:32:37
▲ ▼