The MAGNETISM theory

Well why don’t you go and join them then?

The cosmos isn’t expanding uniformly Izzy….it’s all over for the established model.

I'm not a scientist.

On A2K I can discuss Politics, Literature, History, current events, that sort of thing.

As the cosmos is not expanding uniformly then this suggests that what we observe is as a result of many BB which is exactly what the magnetism theory predicts.

Therefore matter does not fall to a single point resulting in one BC,it falls to many points.

If everything is supposed to fall into a single hole at the end of the day then what about the matter that falls into all the holes that fill the cosmos on the way to this final hole?

Did anyone think about that?

What if there’s nothin left to fall into the final hole….lol

The single BB theory doesn’t make sense…it never did.

As the single BB theory doesn’t add up and is not backed up by observation then the established scientific model needs a serious review but then deep down scientists know that already so why have they been claiming it as a fact when all the time it has been merely a faith;opinion;belief?

So then the magnetism theory says that all matter falls into many spinning holes and not just one.

From observation as well, half of the galaxy’s are spinning clockwise and the other half are spinning counter clockwise.

The magnetism theory predicts that there is a hole at the centre of every spinning galaxy which matter exits and enters

So what continues to cause the spin of the holes?The magnetism theory says that it is the electromagnetic fields that fill the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels.

The magnetism theory states that matter does not fall into a final spinning hole because matter presently intermittently falls into many spinning holes and intermittently exits many spinning holes and this confirms why the cosmos is not expanding uniformly and is confirmed by observation.

The magnetism theory also predicts that if all matter falls into the many spinning holes then the many spinning holes will fall into 2 off final spinning holes,one spinning clockwise and the other spinning anti-clockwise which is consistent with half the galaxy’s in the cosmos spinning clockwise and the other half spinning anti-clockwise.

So what is science’s explanation for all the matter that is clearly falling into many of their “black” holes and not into their final “black” hole?

As matter is falling into their many “black” holes then clearly it isn’t falling into a single “black” hole in line with their single Big Bang theory/Big Crunch theory.

There is something wrong with their calcs.

So I repeat, the magnetism theory states that matter does not fall into a single hole, (not black), because you cannot define a hole by a color.
Matter falls into many holes. Half of which are rotating one way and the other half rotating the opposite way.

I've given you links to science forums, why don't you ask them?

In addition, what is science’s explanation for all the matter that is clearly exiting many of their “black” holes rather than just one.

The answer is that they don’t have an answer to the MULTIPLE BB theory.

MULTIPLE BB/BC explains what is happening in the cosmos and not a SINGLE BB/BC as claimed by science.

PRESENCE is AWARE that all matter exit’s and enters many spinning holes and not just a single spinning hole.

PRESENCE is AWARE that a CONTROLLING force is responsible for both the entering and exiting of matter to/from the holes.

PRESENCE is AWARE that hole spin direction and magnetic force interaction plays a fundamental part in the workings of the cosmos.

PRESENCE is AWARE that it can come and go with matter into/out of the 2 off types of spinning hole or remain OBSERVING.

PRESENCE is AWARE that the going’s in and the coming’s out are related to CONSCIOUSNESS of which there are 2 off types.

A religious science belief system could state that we are no more than consciousness…….yeah but which one?

Autopilot OR Manual?

As all matter definitely enters and exits many HOLES and not just one original hole and this is happening all the time and is observed in the cosmos then scientist need to stop claiming that all matter came out of a single hole.

This misunderstanding is due to poor science.

If anything at all crunches into a single spinning hole then it is all the spinning holes that have all the matter within them.

The spinning still continues though ….why?……electromagnetic processes that’s why.

Gravity…whatever that is (nobody knows) has a lot of explaining to do.

So the magnetism theory states that we have 2 off perfectly symmetrical and in synch separate holes spinning in opposite directions rather than a single static original hole as claimed by the latest scientific theories.

There is a static or still characteristic to the cosmos which has electromagnetic fields within it.These electromagnetic fields are the cause of many many BB and BC which result in the appearance and disappearance of matter.This is clearly observed and confirmed by the FACT that matter is NOT expanding uniformly in the cosmos.

This is final definitive proof that all matter in the cosmos DOES not enter from a single point and DOES not exit from a single point either.

As science thinks that all matter did enter from a single point and will exit from a single point it also thinks that matter is expanding into the total darkness of space as well which is total nonsense of course.It just hasn’t got sufficiently powerful telescopes to confirm that this is nonsense.

I repeat once again.

Nature utilises electromagnetic + and - charge interactions.

It could be said that a + charge (= or balances) a - charge because they are the same.

However, we know that a + charge is not the same as a - charge because we get different results when we bring + and - charges together in their 4 off possible combinations i.e. -/-;-/+;+/-;+/+.

2 off combinations attract and 2 off combinations repel.+ and - charges are NOT (= or balanced or the same) therefore or all the combinations test results would be the same.

So as far as nature is concerned a + is not - and - is not +