1
   

The MAGNETISM theory

 
 
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Tue 3 May, 2022 11:11 pm
@Jasper10,
Electricity is at play in the whole of the cosmos including our physical bodies.

We know that SPIN in electromagnetic fields produces an electrical signal.

We know that that SPIN can be generated by electrical means or non electrical means

We know that electromagnetic SPIN produces sinusoidal waveforms.Sinusoidal waveforms are “toggling” waveforms.

So the appearance and disappearance of matter out of/into many many holes is related to these sinusoidal waveforms which are produced by electromechanical systems according to the magnetism theory.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Sat 7 May, 2022 11:12 am
@Jasper10,
We know that matter enters and exits many holes and so it doesn’t enter and exit just one holes now does it and so that completely puts the single Big Bang theory into its coffin.Observations even confirm multiple BB and BC.

The existing model has had a good run but then good riddance I say.

We need a scientific model that isn’t so isolated from the other sciences and actually makes sense.

Trying to explain the workings of the cosmos with an mysterious unknown force and GLUE is ridiculous.

Electromechanical forces is the only rational explanation for the workings of the cosmos and our physical bodies.

Matter entering and exiting many holes is a natural occurrence in the cosmos.This movement of matter into and out of holes is caused by electromagnetic forces.

Jasper10
 
  -1  
Sat 7 May, 2022 11:38 am
@Jasper10,
Electromagnetic fields saturate the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels and this has always been the case.

As observations confirm that matter enters and exists many holes within these electromagnetic fields and not just one hole then why is science claiming that matter enters and exits just one hole?

They need to go looking for all that matter that is disappearing into all the holes so that they can shovel down their single hole …lol.



Jasper10
 
  -1  
Mon 9 May, 2022 12:53 am
@Jasper10,
If there is one piece of definitive proof that we have its that the present scientific model confirms what isn’t happening in the cosmos.

Matter is entering and exiting many many holes exactly in line with the magnetism theory.

Matter never did and never will enter and exit from a single hole.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Thu 12 May, 2022 12:06 am
@Jasper10,
Science may have a model with calcs to back it up,however, if it doesn’t correlate with what is actually happening in the cosmos at the macro and micro levels then what purpose is it serving?
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Thu 12 May, 2022 12:42 am
@Jasper10,
Let’s be honest science hasn’t a clue how the universe began and their calcs are confirming this.

All they have is a scientific model and calcs to back it up on how they wished or hoped the universe began which are now being observed as incorrect.

Science is rapidly losing all its credibility.

Jasper10
 
  -1  
Thu 12 May, 2022 05:33 am
@Jasper10,
Scientists are not even spotting what is right under their noses.

I repeat.....How can all matter have come from one single hole and how can all matter disappear down one final single hole if all matter is presently OBSEREVED as entering and exiting many many holes?

What nonsense are they going to come up with to try and get out of that one?


Jasper10
 
  -1  
Thu 12 May, 2022 05:55 am
@Jasper10,
It all over for the present scientific model because it doesn't correlate with nature or sound philosophy, is not true science and definitely does not tie up with what is actually observed.

It's all catching up with them.....
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Fri 13 May, 2022 01:40 pm
@Jasper10,
There is a direct connection between workings of the mind and the workings of the cosmos.

Science hasn’t made this connection yet because it’s model is wrong.

Jasper10
 
  -1  
Sun 15 May, 2022 01:21 am
@Jasper10,
It makes sense to me that if the body operates due to electromechanical processes then the cosmos does to.

There has to be symmetry between the two.


Analogy:
Imagine 2 sine waves.The sine wave can be either in synch or out of synch.The sine waves are consciousness waveforms.

PRESENCE (i am) can CONTROL whether the sine waves are in synch or out of synch.

If PRESENCE (i am) brings the wave forms in synch then MANUAL consciousness is experienced.

0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Mon 16 May, 2022 12:28 am
@Jasper10,
The MAGNETISM theory acknowledges PRESENCE.

It also acknowledges AWARENESS and not just UNAWARENESS.

It also acknowledges that PRESENCE can introduce CONTROL of the consciousness states.

The MAGNETISM theory acknowledges both the AUTOMATIC and NON AUTOMATIC control/processing systems.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Mon 16 May, 2022 02:06 am
@Jasper10,
The present scientific model does not recognise PRESENCE; AWARENESS; CONTROL. It doesn’t recognise these elements because for there to be AWARENESS and CONTROL there needs to be something that is AWARE (PRESENCE) that can introduce CONTROL. Science doesn’t BELIEVE that these elements exist.

Science is stuck in consciousness therefore (their hard problem) claiming we are nothing more than it, even though they haven’t a clue what it is, just like they haven't a clue what their gravity is.

Science only recognises UNAWARE consciousness “toggling” without CONTROL because it is stuck in UNAWARENESS.

The idea that PRESENCE does not exist comes from an inward only meditative practices. PRESENCE deliberately goes inward into an out of synch consciousness state DIVIDES and then begins the deliberations which result in the conclusion that PRESENCE (the very thing that decided to go inward on the first place ) doesn’t exist.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Mon 16 May, 2022 11:14 pm
@Jasper10,
As you cannot describe a hole by a colour as in black or white you need to come up with another description.

“Glass” is a good description for the many many holes in the universe.

Matter enters and exits many many “Glass” holes in the universe and this is exactly what is observed.The magnetism theory ties in perfectly with the “Glass” analogy.

PRESENCE is separate from matter.

Electromagnetic fields don’t enter or exit “Glass” holes.

Electromagnetic fields are the STATIC part of the universe.Matter is the MOVING part.

Jasper10
 
  -1  
Tue 17 May, 2022 03:54 am
@Jasper10,
Electromagnetic fields DICTATE to matter. Matter doesn't dictate to electromagnetic fields. If you throw iron filings into a magnetic field they do as they are told.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Tue 17 May, 2022 11:46 pm
@Jasper10,
As all matter is not exiting via a single hole, why is science claiming that it does?
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Wed 18 May, 2022 12:25 am
@Jasper10,
Science needs to explain where it’s gravity theory fits into the reality of multiple BB and BC being the reason for matter entering and exiting the universe.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Wed 18 May, 2022 05:06 am
@Jasper10,
The present scientific model is not only wrong it is embarrassingly wrong for science because all the evidence has been there for a long time now which totally proves it to be wrong. There is no room for a gravity theory in a multiple BB and BC universe which is what we actually have.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Wed 18 May, 2022 11:54 pm
@Jasper10,
So scientist are now AWARE that all matter exits and enters many many holes and not just one hole and this is confirmed by observation and the fact that the universe is not expanding uniformally.They knew this anyway, they must have forgot.Too preoccupied with a nonsense theory I suspect.Matter has no choice but to do as it is told in the electromagnetic fields that fill the universe at all levels (macro and micro).It’s only because there have always been electromagnetic fields that many many BB’s and BC’s happen.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Fri 20 May, 2022 12:07 am
@Jasper10,
Well it is now becoming clear that is is possible for a theory to be invented and a new force as yet “UNKNOWN TO NATURE” to be invented also which has an invented mathematical model that attempts to back it up.

That is precisely what we have with the present scientific model.

The issue with all that is that even IF the calculations appear to back up the invented theory, it’s a useless theory if observations don’t back it up.

As observations show that many many BB are occurring in the universe and not just one and observations also show that matter falls into many many holes and not just one then the present invented scientific model which claims all matter came from a single point and will go back to a single point is incorrect.

The invented and incorrect theory (according to observations) is just a figment of the imagination of the individual/individuals who came up with it.



Jasper10
 
  -1  
Fri 20 May, 2022 05:01 am
@Jasper10,
What else can it be other than a figment of a scientist imagination if observations confirm a multiple BB/BC theory?

The BB and BC crunch idea isn't the problem here, its the single or multiple BB/BC and the mechanisms that cause them that's the issue.
 

Related Topics

Physics of the Biblical Flood - Discussion by gungasnake
Suggest forum, physics - Question by dalehileman
The nature of space and time - Question by shanemcd3
I don't understand how this car works. - Discussion by DrewDad
An Embarassment to Science - Discussion by Leadfoot
Gravitational waves Discovered ! - Discussion by Fil Albuquerque
BICEP and now LIGO discover gravity waves - Discussion by farmerman
Transient fields - Question by puzzledperson
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/27/2022 at 01:41:38