The MAGNETISM theory

Thanks Izzy will do

The magnetism theory completely does a way with the need for Newtonian Mechanics and General Relativity…

The magnetism theory states that there is a “toggling” moving element to the cosmos but it also states that there is a “still” element to the cosmos that contains the “toggling” moving elements……..the big bangs and big crunches just occur within the still element……the still element needs a current input to produce the electromagnetic fields within it that are required to produce the moving elements.

As “toggling” +/- magnetic forces are the reason that all matter sticks together (based upon full science logic) and glue (based upon half science logic) plays no part….lol…..that one still cracks me up….sorry…then what holds stars/planets etc in place……..well there is clearly a balanced combination of force interactions going on in the cosmos because we have a situation of stronger and weaker electromagnets all producing varying amounts of push/pull +/- forces which is dependent upon their spin speeds.The moon for example is spinning at just the right speed in relation to the earths spin which enables there to be not enough force for it to drift away from earth but equally there is not enough electromagnetic force that would cause the moon to “collide” with the earth.

Different stars/black holes (which aren’t black holes)/planets are all spinning at different speeds so there is clearly some amazing balanced push/pull force interaction happening.

Why does modern day science insist on only pursuing a HALF science based upon a HALF philosophy when it knows that you need a + and - force on both sides of the equation in order to balance things out?…..

The magnetism theory has confirmed this because if + and - forces were the same then the 4 off magnetic force interactions of -/-…-/+…+/-…+/+ would be the same and they are NOT.

Why does modern day science think it knows better than nature itself…..lol…

So we know that nature utilises FULL logic in its make up and we know that modern day science only utilises HALF logic in its scientific and philosophical deliberations……is it any wonder that modern day science is in serious trouble?

So the magnetism theory states that we have a chicken and egg scenario…….

…the thing is that we have electromagnetic fields permeating the whole of the cosmos (macro/micro) which is causing SPIN and yet you need SPIN to create the current that is required to produce the electromagnetic fields ….haha….the cosmos is an amazing electromechanical closed loop system creating perpetual energy.

So the electromagnetic fields are the FULCRUM for the creation of big bangs and big crunches.

The electromagnetic magnetic fields were in place at the same time as the big bangs big crunches then contrary to what modern day science states…..

The magnetism theory states that it is the SPIN rate of an object within the cosmos at both the macro/micro levels which determines its “toggling” magnetic force.

The earth for example has a set spin rate which determines its “toggling” magnetic force.The moon on the other hand has a different spin rate resulting in a different “toggling” magnetic force.

The distance between these two objects is just right to achieve “toggling” magnetic force PUSH/PULL balance.

Other objects in the cosmos have far greater spin rates resulting in far greater “toggling” magnetic forces.

The “toggling” electromagnetic forces at the core of subatomic particles are contained within electromagnetic fields that fill the cosmos.This overall complex rotating electromechanical system is the power force that drives the cosmos.

The magnetism theory states that the electromagnetic fields that fill the cosmos are separate from matter,hence big bangs/big crunches happen within the electromagnetic fields but the electromagnetic fields are not influenced by them.

The magnetic fields were around at the same time as big bangs/big crunches or else spin would not be possible that produces the electrical inputs that produces the electromagnetic fields that produces the spin, that produces the electromagnetic forces which interact in ways that produce balanced push/pull forces that hold matter together OR produce unbalanced magnetic force interactions resulting in big bangs and big crunches. …………haha………. now get your head around that one……..,,,….so says the MAGNETISM THEORY.

The magnetism theory works.......you can't reject it due to poor science that's for sure.

You can reject it if you are sold on the gravity theory.

The gravity theory is a half theory backed up with a guess that might in the future balance the other half of the equation.

Science needs to change its accepted model.

The magnetism theory is a “closed loop” push/pull theory.

Science is just looking for the other half of its gravity theory so that it has its own “closed loop” push/pull theory.

The magnetism theory states that the overall magnetic fields that are within the whole of the cosmos are responsible for the SPIN of HOLES/planets/subatomic particles and the resulting + and - magnetic forces that result which interact in ways that provide the balanced and unbalanced push/pull forces between the HOLES/planets/sub atomic particles.

The SPIN rate of the HOLES/planet's/sub atomic particles which determine the magnetic forces produced along with the distances between the HOLES/planets and sub atomic particles determine whether they are held in a balanced state in relation to each other or whether the HOLES/planets/sub atomic particles are subject to biased + or - magnetic forces between each other.

Absolutely astounding, if the theory is correct.

Scientists are searching for dark matter.

Are they searching for light matter as well?…..well the answer to that question is no because they are influenced by a one sided theory.

There is no such thing as dark matter or light matter.

According to the magnetism theory and consciousness awareness there is such a thing as a theoretical 3rd pivotal force though which could be described as a “see through” anchor point or fulcrum balancing force.

Big Bangs and Big crunches can only happen in magnetic fields.

No magnetic fields then no big bangs or big crunches …so says the magnetism theory.

So the magnetism theory states that 3 things determine why stars/planets/holes remain in their orbits as follows:

1.The spin speed of stars/planets/holes is directly related to their magnetic strength.
2.There is a push/pull interaction between stars/planets/holes due to the offset of their north/south poles and their spin.This offset varies.
3.The distance between stars/planets/holes is precise,thus a magnetic push/pull balance is maintained.

Holes (not black) have enormous magnetic pull which is directly related to their spin rate.

Big Bangs are the result of enormous -/- or +/+ magnetic charge interactions.

So says the magnetism theory.

If scientists could just get over the notion that electromagnetic fields came about after their BB then the magnetism theory would make more sense to them.

BB’s and BC’s don’t happen unless electromagnetic fields are in place according to the magnetism theory.