The MAGNETISM theory

Get used to hearing about the MAGNETISM theory and the original write up to this post because the evidence out there fits far better than the ridiculous HALF gravity theory……that needs a FAITH and HOPE that one day ANTIGRAVITY will turn up……..forget about gravity/antigravity……….Electromagnetism has it covered…

The MAGNETISM theory states that big bangs and big crunches happened after the electromechanical fields were in place and not before.

Big Bangs and Big Crunches are associated with MOVEMENT.

Electromagnetic fields on the other hand are associated with STILLNESS.

So what was before the BIG BANG???????

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS!!!!!!!!!!!

For me the only rational explanation is that the electromagnetic fields that are in the entire cosmos are dependent on an electrical input from somewhere…….you don’t get electromagnetic fields otherwise.

Electromagnetic fields cause objects to spin whether this be at the macro or micro levels.

Unless modern day science wants to alter its science …..the spin produces + and - charges.

Unless modern day science wants to alter its science ….+ and - charges interact in 4 off possible ways……-/-…..-/+….+/-….+/+…

Unless modern day science wants to alter its science the above charge interactions produce attraction/repulsion to happen between objects/ particles at both the macro/ micro levels

Unless modern day science wants to change its science Big Bangs and Big Crunches could be the results of the differing charge interactions.

Unless modern day science wants to change its science the Big Bangs/Big Crunches happen within the electromagnetic magnetic fields that caused them to happen.

Big Bangs and Big Crunches are therefore just a by product of a more complicated overall system.

It could be claimed and is claimed that the electromagnetic fields came about after the Big Bang ….however there may be a slight problem with this because the MAGNETISM theory states that the Big Bang couldn’t happen unless the electromagnetic fields were first in place…

Half theories which is all that modern day science seems to be able to come up with are of no use to anyone at all….All the presently accepted theories are built around the gravity theory and yet they are still adopting spiritual practices in the hope that antigravity will show up …the same goes for the Big Bang theory…..science states that this what happened and yet it can’t say how it happened and are resorting to spiritual HOPE practices….….the same goes for it’s search for white holes …and the same goes for it’s GLUE replacement whilst it waits for the infamous antigravity to show up….and so it goes on ….

Not so with the MAGNETISM theory….it is a full theory….it doesn’t need to resort to guesses/assumptions/fudged calculations/biased logic and BS.

SOUND science can only be based upon SOUND philosophy and sound philosophy states that as no definitive proof is provided one way or the other on key issues then don’t just guess or assume….go with the possibilities…….If you don’t then you will end up with half scientific theories which can’t explain how the Big Bang happened….which is EXACTLY where modern day science is now…because it has BS itself…

…….the cosmos macro/micro operates on -/-…-/+….+/-…+/+ logic possibilities …….right down to the very reasonings that develop theories…

You can incorporate sound logic output possibilities into scientific theories

Gravity …let’s be honest…..what is it exactly?….. lol…..as far as I can see it’s a myth taught as fact…..

Modern day science will need to explain why their mythical half gravity theory only complies with half Boolean logic……0,1..1,0…..

…..the magnetism theory complies fully with Boolean logic…0,0…0,1…1,0…1,1……….it knows the rules……

I repeat once again for those who weren’t listening the first time……Magnetic fields had to be around before the big bangs and big crunches or else spin wouldn’t happen and +/- charges wouldn’t be created ….if you don’t have toggling +/- charges then you don’t have Boolean logic…the principles of which apply throughout the sciences except of course modern day science’s Gravity theory/Big Bang theory which we now know is a nonsense HALF theory.

How does gravity and his antigravity twin…when he shows up that is ….going to adequately explain the spin of the planets and stars and sub atomic particles?…..this is another big question modern day science hasn’t been able to give an adequate explanations to because it hasn’t got a clue…….WHY?…….This is fundamental stuff …….is it any wonder with it half theories….

The magnetism theory doesn’t have that problem…

The magnetism theory unites the sciences….

The gravity theory is going to start looking a bit limp now that the magnetism theory has arrived.It is going to have to step up its game or else it is in danger of being thrown on the scrap heap…which in my opinion is where it belongs.

Electromagnetic fields were around before the big bangs/big crunches….

The magnetism theory only works if the electromagnetic fields that are throughout the cosmos were around BEFORE the big bangs and big crunches…..

The magnetism theory states that things fall to the ground because of magnetic forces and not gravity.The reason being is that planets and subatomic particles spin resulting not only in toggling +/- forces which keep matter together but the spinning objects also become electromagnets which means they are attracted to other objects.

What is gravity…does anyone know?????

Modern day science needs to consider the possibility that the electromagnetic fields that completely fill the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels were in place prior to any big bangs and big crunches.The problem is how did they get there?

You need an electrical input to create electromagnetic fields and yet the toggling +/- charges that are required to create the electrical input aren’t created until the electromagnetic fields are in place……

A nice real scientific problem that we should be focussing our attention on and yet modern day science is still lost trying prove its mythical gravity theory is correct with its 0,1…1,0 half philosophy logic….completely ignoring the fact that magnetism provides all the answers and adopts full logic..0,0…0,1…1,0…1,1..

The new scientific force equation is:

+/- charge (toggling) = +/- charge (toggling) …….the push/pull effect

It’s this force equation theory that better defines what is actually happening in nature at both the macro and micro levels.

So getting back to the “chicken and egg” conundrum of which came first/ happened first ….the Big Bang/Big Crunch or Electromagnetic fields.

As explained before you don’t get “toggling” big bangs/big crunches without electromagnetic fields because without electromagnetic fields you don’t get spin and therefore no magnetic + and - charges are generated that interact in the 4 off possible combinations -/-..-/+…+/-…+/+ resulting in big bangs and big crunches.

The problem is that you require the spin to generate the electricity that would then be needed to be fed into the system to create the electromagnetic fields….

Ummmm…which came first?……I know, maybe they both came first.

So there is the possibility that we have 2 off systems feeding each other?……more on that later….

It would appear that the above process may be directly related to the functioning of the brain as well which operates due to the same electromechanical processes.

It would appear that there are 2 off separate systems associated with the brain.These systems work together each generating their own electricity for input into the other system.The electricity being required to create the electromagnetic fields which provides the spin which generates the electricity……

The same electromechanical process providing the 4 off toggling logic reasoning outputs.

An amazing multi functioning “closed loop” system.

A new poster called Mitko Gorgiev has just started a thread on his theory of gravity. I thought you might want to check it out.