0
   

The MAGNETISM theory

 
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Oct, 2021 02:05 am
@Jasper10,
Big Bangs/Big Crunches are happening all the time in the cosmos so what makes scientists think that the electromagnetic fields in the cosmos will disappear following their final Big Crunch?...…. just another standard science model ASSUMPTION....How many standard science model assumptions does it take to completely invalidate the standard science model?
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2021 06:21 am
@Jasper10,
The electromechanical system that makes the cosmos and every physical thing within it (including us) function is the driving force and explains how “toggling” + and - charges are created.How modern day science has missed this fact is embarrassing.Clearly, there is a science/philosophy that can be and has been developed utilising only HALF logic output combinations….An electromechanical system requires a separate external force for it to operate…..Mental functioning and the brain can be better explained utilising FULL logic output combinations……
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Oct, 2021 01:02 pm
@Jasper10,
Science needs to get into the concept of “bubble”.

Bubble is not darkness or light.

Bubble contains the separated dark/light.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2021 12:21 am
@Jasper10,
The problem with the gravity theory is that it is a HALF theory.Scientists need to find the other HALF…..…because they can’t find the other HALF they have resorted to making stuff up….i.e. GLUE…. to try and balance things out…It doesn’t work and will never work.

The MAGNETISM theory is FULL theory and has all the ingredients….you don’t need to go looking for the other HALF.

The cosmos at the macro and micro levels is crying out magnetism theory…what is wrong with you scientists…why do you deny what is staring you in the face.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Oct, 2021 12:45 am
@Jasper10,
The MAGNETISM theory fits in with philosophy perfectly.

As it is not possible to confirm some things definitively you have to utilise possibility logic combinations in equations…you can’t rely on biased belief systems or assumptions to influence your calcs .Science is not interested in bias but it does allow for bias it would appear.

As modern day science and the standard model doesn’t allow for possibility logic combinations in its calcs we have ended up with a HALF science based upon gravity and a bunch of confused scientists trying to find it’s mirror imaging counter part but resorting to glue in the meantime to try balance things out….and badly I might add.

My advice is that modern day science needs to give up on its gravity theory as the foundation for it’s standard model….it’s lost cause….

Modern day HALF science is rapidly starting to look very foolish.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Oct, 2021 01:10 am
@Jasper10,
There are “toggling” + and - forces at play within the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels along with an overarching “0” static balanced force.

The “toggling” + and - forces are contained within the “0” static balanced force.

Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Oct, 2021 02:09 am
@Jasper10,
The magnetism theory correlates with philosophy and psychology.

The gravity theory doesn’t and has resulted in a mishmash of biased and confused ideas that make no sense at all.It’s a theory that doesn’t correlate with the other sciences.If scientist want a united theory they need to broaden their thinking and be more open to new ideas which still correlate with what is actually observed.

The cosmos is full of magnetic fields and spinning objects within….it cries out an electromechanical system is at play which causes “toggling” forces within ……The physical body is an electromechanical system as well so it all correlates…

Modern day science needs a reality check.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2021 01:22 am
@Jasper10,
The “toggling” + and - forces within the overarching 0 balanced static force provide the 4 off logic output possibility combinations of 0,0….0,1….1,0….1,1 and NOT just 0,1….1,0 logic output possibility combinations as modern day science assumes and bases all its science on with the end result of HALF science theories….i.e. the GRAVITY theory.

Science also assumes that 0 and 1 are the same and yet this has been proved incorrect by the 4 off observed interactions of + and - which DON’T all provide the same output because similar charges repel and different charges attract.

The 4 off output possibility combination interactions explain both the big bangs and big crunches that are observed within the universe and occur all the time.

The overarching magnetic field which helps produce these big bangs/big crunches still remains in place before and after they occur…..so why scientists believe this overarching magnetic field will disappear after their final Big Crunch and similarly why they believe that this overarching magnetic field wasn’t already in place prior to their initial Big Bang is something that they will need to explain.


Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Oct, 2021 01:48 am
@Jasper10,
The overarching “0” balanced static force requires an external input it would appear.

As all sciences are interconnected the magnetism theory is a better fit than the gravity theory.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Physics of the Biblical Flood - Discussion by gungasnake
Suggest forum, physics - Question by dalehileman
The nature of space and time - Question by shanemcd3
I don't understand how this car works. - Discussion by DrewDad
An Embarassment to Science - Discussion by Leadfoot
Gravitational waves Discovered ! - Discussion by Fil Albuquerque
BICEP and now LIGO discover gravity waves - Discussion by farmerman
Transient fields - Question by puzzledperson
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/17/2021 at 10:45:07