The MAGNETISM theory

Big Bangs/Big Crunches are happening all the time in the cosmos so what makes scientists think that the electromagnetic fields in the cosmos will disappear following their final Big Crunch?...…. just another standard science model ASSUMPTION....How many standard science model assumptions does it take to completely invalidate the standard science model?

The electromechanical system that makes the cosmos and every physical thing within it (including us) function is the driving force and explains how “toggling” + and - charges are created.How modern day science has missed this fact is embarrassing.Clearly, there is a science/philosophy that can be and has been developed utilising only HALF logic output combinations….An electromechanical system requires a separate external force for it to operate…..Mental functioning and the brain can be better explained utilising FULL logic output combinations……

Science needs to get into the concept of “bubble”.

Bubble is not darkness or light.

Bubble contains the separated dark/light.

The problem with the gravity theory is that it is a HALF theory.Scientists need to find the other HALF…..…because they can’t find the other HALF they have resorted to making stuff up….i.e. GLUE…. to try and balance things out…It doesn’t work and will never work.

The MAGNETISM theory is FULL theory and has all the ingredients….you don’t need to go looking for the other HALF.

The cosmos at the macro and micro levels is crying out magnetism theory…what is wrong with you scientists…why do you deny what is staring you in the face.

The MAGNETISM theory fits in with philosophy perfectly.

As it is not possible to confirm some things definitively you have to utilise possibility logic combinations in equations…you can’t rely on biased belief systems or assumptions to influence your calcs .Science is not interested in bias but it does allow for bias it would appear.

As modern day science and the standard model doesn’t allow for possibility logic combinations in its calcs we have ended up with a HALF science based upon gravity and a bunch of confused scientists trying to find it’s mirror imaging counter part but resorting to glue in the meantime to try balance things out….and badly I might add.

My advice is that modern day science needs to give up on its gravity theory as the foundation for it’s standard model….it’s lost cause….

Modern day HALF science is rapidly starting to look very foolish.

There are “toggling” + and - forces at play within the cosmos at both the macro and micro levels along with an overarching “0” static balanced force.

The “toggling” + and - forces are contained within the “0” static balanced force.

The magnetism theory correlates with philosophy and psychology.

The gravity theory doesn’t and has resulted in a mishmash of biased and confused ideas that make no sense at all.It’s a theory that doesn’t correlate with the other sciences.If scientist want a united theory they need to broaden their thinking and be more open to new ideas which still correlate with what is actually observed.

The cosmos is full of magnetic fields and spinning objects within….it cries out an electromechanical system is at play which causes “toggling” forces within ……The physical body is an electromechanical system as well so it all correlates…

Modern day science needs a reality check.

The “toggling” + and - forces within the overarching 0 balanced static force provide the 4 off logic output possibility combinations of 0,0….0,1….1,0….1,1 and NOT just 0,1….1,0 logic output possibility combinations as modern day science assumes and bases all its science on with the end result of HALF science theories….i.e. the GRAVITY theory.

Science also assumes that 0 and 1 are the same and yet this has been proved incorrect by the 4 off observed interactions of + and - which DON’T all provide the same output because similar charges repel and different charges attract.

The 4 off output possibility combination interactions explain both the big bangs and big crunches that are observed within the universe and occur all the time.

The overarching magnetic field which helps produce these big bangs/big crunches still remains in place before and after they occur…..so why scientists believe this overarching magnetic field will disappear after their final Big Crunch and similarly why they believe that this overarching magnetic field wasn’t already in place prior to their initial Big Bang is something that they will need to explain.

The overarching “0” balanced static force requires an external input it would appear.

As all sciences are interconnected the magnetism theory is a better fit than the gravity theory.

Modern day science has a big problem because it can’t balance its books with a reasonable theory…..

Not so with the MAGNETISM theory it can balance the books perfectly…..

Modern day HALF science has a lot of embarrassing questions to answer going forward to try and defend its present standard model which doesn’t add up.

You cannot have a united theory without factoring in the human consciousness and experience.

The MAGNETISM theory is a better theory than the GRAVITY theory because it has all the ingredients to explain things.

The cosmos and our physical bodies are an electromechanical system.

An electromechanical system NEEDS an EXTERNAL input.

All sciences are interconnected

What has the biased one sided HALF logic GRAVITY theory got to offer when it tries to factor in human consciousness/experience……..absolutely nothing!!

The GRAVITY theory doesn’t add up scientifically or philosophically and is a floundering out of date theory.

Electromechanical systems have a STILL element as well as a moving element with its associated “toggling”.

SELF is aware of this.

There is only one dog with a happy tail.

There is only “one dog with a happy tail” means that there is a STATIC or STILL element to the cosmos and our physical (and psychological) make up which requires an EXTERNAL input.The EXTERNAL input ultimately initiates the wagging tail.

Therefore the big bags and big crunches (MOVING elements) which are happening all the time in the cosmos don’t initiate themselves…..THEY ARE INITIATED……by a separate independent controlling force which inputs into the STATIC element which then results in the MOVING “toggling”element to the cosmos and our physical (and psychological) make up.

The STATIC element will sit there waiting for the EXTERNAL input.If there is no external input then MOVEMENT “toggling” doesn’t happen.

Modern day science can’t explain what initiates big bangs OR their initial “Big Bang” and it’s theory on “Big Crunches” OR their final “Big Crunch” is incorrect because it is based upon HALF logic combination possibilities i.e. because they have got their PHILOSOPHY wrong.they have got their science wrong as well.

The MAGNETISM theory is a better theory than the GRAVITY theory because it is a more in depth and balanced FULL theory.

The MAGNETISM theory brings human experience and consciousness into the equation i.e. incorporates BALANCED philosophy .The GRAVITY theory fails to do this.

The electromagnetic effect:

So then, to put this onto practice, there is an overall balanced but static equilibrium force associated with our physical bodies and the cosmos.The 2 off separate but opposite forces interact due to “toggling” resulting in the 4 off logic output possibility force combinations of 0,0…0,1…1,0..1,1.

As the overall output of the force combinations is balanced the atoms of our physical bodies don’t drift apart even though the 4 off force combination interactions result in attraction/repulsion movements within.

For the above system to work there needs to be an initiator who inputs into this electromechanical system from an EXTERNAL source.

That INITIATOR is SELF.

+ and - forces are different….they are NOT the same.This has been proved because the attraction of + and - forces does not happen with -/- or +/+ forces when they interact because they repel.

This observation can be taken into philosophy because all sciences are interconnected.

So the question is why does modern day science persist in ASSUMING that good and bad are the same and not consider the possibility that they are not the same?

Modern day HALF scientific theories are an embarrassment and an insult to psychological realities/reasonings.

Science is based upon FULL logic output possibility combinations and this IS in line with the MAGNETISM theory and IS confirmed by observation.

The FACT is that both the cosmos and our physical bodies ARE electromechanical systems.

Modern day science has got it wrong…PERIOD.

There are so many interesting questions that come out of the magnetism theory…like why are’t + and - the same….why are they different and why when they interact in the 4 off possible ways -/-…-/+…+/-…+/+..don’t they produce the same attraction/repulsion result every time.

So why is it that in order to make these charges balance you need a fence because you need both + and - charges on BOTH sides of the fence to make them balance.

All very interesting questions when you consider philosophy and the psychological make up…which you must do if you want to get closer to an overall united theory …a theory that must correlate with the workings of the cosmos as well.

There are fixed and moving elements to the cosmos and our physical make up not just moving elements.The moving elements happen within the fixed element.

Can I re-iterate at this point ..don’t worry about your belief systems one way or the other because ones beliefs system are taken care of in the magnetism theory …the magnetism theory doesn’t take sides because the magnetism theory doesn’t care what your belief systems are….it lets SELF choose on that score…