0
   

The Base of Physics, (a brief history of touchy and feely))

 
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2021 05:35 am
@htam9876,
Ha Ha...come on guys play ground stuff.....it's water off ducks back to me...

Ouch....I'm not a "biological logic machine" htam9876... I might have interfaces with it and so in that respect I am AWARE.

The MAGNETISM theory is just a theory and makes use of established science....and is therefore real science not BS science that you are basing all your calculations on. Science only goes on about GARVITY (contraction).It remains very silent on what causes the expansion in the first place.

The MAGNETISM theory could explain this (+/+...-/-)..

This isn't going nowhere fast htam9876.......if the MAGNETSIM theory is a reasonable theory then you are going to have re-think all your calcs my friend.

Are either of you going to come up with a sensible challenge or not?





Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2021 06:26 am
@Jasper10,
check mate then!!!
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2021 07:00 am
Piggy doesn’t know how to stop the persisting malicious disturbance from the "NO BRAIN, NO PAIN" “profoundly sick” in the mind guy Jasper 10. Piggy is very sorry that the consecutiveness of this thread has been seriously damaged.
To prevent this thread from being obliged to suspend too, piggy decides to adopt two emergency measures as below:
1. Ignore all of Jasper 10 rubbish trolling post;
2. As soon as piggy has prepared the materials, piggy would post it for reference to those guys who are willing to touch the elephant from an alternative angle.
Piggy is trying to do his best to maintain normal research in natural science here.
Sorry guys.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2021 07:03 am
The problem of contraction of space in Einstein’s SR, touchy and feely:

Now it’s time to entirely solve this problem.

The Mass – Space equation: r ∝ 1 / M or say L ∝ 1 / M;
The Time – Space equation L ∝1 / △t.

The dynamic Mass – Space equation: r’ ∝ 1 / M or say L’ ∝ 1 / M;
The dynamic Space – Time equation: L’ ∝ 1 /△t’.

The mass and time are all scalars without direction. So, the contraction of space should be in all directions.
Exactly the affair of inflation / deflation of space or time should be the substantial affair in the PRESENCE – PROPERTY system.

Or think it in this way “the relativistic factor “γ” is just a mathematical symbol originally representing proportion only, which does not concern the direction of movement”. So, the contraction of space should be in all directions.

Below is a thought experiment to demonstrate the insufficiency of the traditional Lorentz transformation.
When someone stays stationary relative to the sun, he will see that the sun is a round ball. When he moves to the sun in constant velocity (the sun moves to him relatively), he will see that the sun is an oval ball/thin due to the "length contraction effect" in the direction of movement.
The effect of gravity is even in all directions, so the sun is round; if the sun is thin, that means the effect of gravity is not even in all directions. Physics rule is not equivalent in different inertial frames? But one of the postulates of SR is "physics rule is equivalent" in different inertial frames...

Actually, there is another very simple thought experiment to demonstrate the inherent flaw of the traditional Lorentz transformation in Einstein’s SR.
Assume an object is moving in speed v in frame S, the same angles with all axis x,y,z for simplicity. Then, in frame S, the components of speed v along x,y,z axis are the same. While in frame S’, because the Lorentz transformation formulas in the cross direction is not the same as that of the along direction (the moving direction of frame S’), that’s mean the components of speed v’ along x’,y’,z’ axis are NOT the same. Then, physics rule is not the same in different inertial frames.

If we resort to the space contraction in all directions (Lorentz transformation is the same in all directions) as per the analysis ahead, the above flaw can be amended easily.

(to be continued)

Liqiang Chen
陈力强
August 26, 2021
给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代,全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Aug, 2021 08:43 am
@htam9876,
Well it's a shame that you take that approach htam9876...you still have not come back with a valid challenge to the MAGNETISM theory by the way.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2021 03:19 pm
Now this thread has been serious disturbed by the "NO BRAIN, NO PAIN" “profoundly sick” in the mind guy. (or merely a malfunctioned “biology logic machine”?) and is already half dead. It’s a tragedy in science.
Perhaps the happiest in this cosmos should be the First Order. They surely are cheerful again.

Piggy suggests that "NO BRAIN, NO PAIN" “profoundly sick” in the mind guy (or merely a malfunctioned “biology logic machine”? who only can imagine this think that randomly. ) pee on the ground as a mirror to take a look at himself, how many natural science it actually knows, how many equations it actually can read, what he actually can do in natural science except imagine this think that randomly, and then AUTOPILOTly go to hell.


0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Aug, 2021 08:21 am
(continued)

Below is a third thought experiment to demonstrate the insufficiency of the traditional Lorentz transformation.
Assume a part of stable DC circuit with the shape of “L” rests in inertial frame S: section 1 horizontal; section 2 vertical; wire cutting face is a square for convenience. Another inertial frame S’ moves rightward at velocity u.
 https://static.wixstatic.com/media/825b02_57d9d89844e54dfca3c6d8782abbdd42~mv2.jpg
The purpose of this thought experiment is to verify whether the “length contraction effect” is in all direction as per the analysis ahead shows or just in the moving direction as traditional Lorentz transformation shows.

First, analysis resorts to traditional Lorentz transformation.
In frame S:
For section 1, I1 = n1qv1; for section 2, I2 = n2qv2
(Here take the moving direction of electron as the direction of current for convenience, n is the density of free electron in the wire, q is the charge carried by electron, v is the moving velocity of free electron.)
I1 = I2, n1 = n2 = n, v1 = v2 = v
In frame S’:
For section 1, △x’ = △x / γ , △y’ = △y , △z’ = △z
V’ = △x’△y’△z’ = △x△y△z / γ = V / γ (V’ is volume in frame S’, V is volume in frame S)
So, n1’ = γn1 = γn
Lorentz transformation of velocity:
v1’ = (v1 - u) / (1 - u v1/c² )
I1’ = n1’qv1’ = γnq (v1 - u) / (1 - u v1/c²)
For section 2, also V’ = V / γ
So, n2’ = γn2 = γn
Lorentz transformation of velocity:
v2’ = v2 / γ(1 - u v1/c²)
I2’ = n2’qv2’ = γnq v2 / γ(1 - u v1/c²) = nq v2 / (1 - u v1/c²)
I1’ ≠ I2’
Physics rule is not equally applicable in inertial frame S’.

Next, resort to the space contraction in all directions as per the analysis ahead.
In frame S’:
For section 1, n1’ = γ³n1 = γ³n
v1’ = dx’ / dt’ = (v1 - u) / (1 - u v1/c² )
I1’ = n1’qv1’ = γ³nq (v1 - u) / (1 - u v1/c²)
For section 2, n2’ = γ³n2 = γ³n
v2’ = dz’ / dt’ = dx’ / dt’ = (v1 - u) / (1 - u v1/c² )
I2’ = n2’qv2’ = γ³nq (v1 - u) / (1 - u v1/c²)
I1’ = I2’
Physics rule is equally applicable in inertial frame S’.

Of course, the “L” shape DC circuit scenario can be verified. Just fix two electric meters in the sections and watch if their values are the same. It’s not a difficult experiment to do.

Liqiang Chen
陈力强
August 31, 2021
给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代,全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 09/16/2021 at 02:44:21