McTag wrote:As a side issue, in this country when a citizen is called up for jury service (there are few exemptions) they have a most unpleasant time, spending little of their time in an actual trial, waiting around with nothing to do, and given next to no information. Very poor.
You have to be very dedicated to your duties as a citizen to do the job properly. Some aren't.
There is little or no jury selection in Britain, or so I am told by an American businessman who has some experience with the legal system over there.
In America, the jury is the end result of endless sifting, supposedly designed to ensure an completely impartial jury. Of course, both sides are really trying to get jury members they perceive as likely to favor their side. In high profile cases, as we have seen, it could take weeks-although in most cases it is not nearly so long.
In Britain, apparently the jury consists of the next 12 members of the jury pool. The two sides don't even question them, apparently. It's just a case of seating the next 12 jurors waiting in line. "Jury selection", if you want to call it that, takes 5 minutes.
As the American businessman, Victor Kiam, said, "Your next door neighbor or brother-in-law could be on the jury and apparently it wouldn't make a difference".