0
   

Attack in London Today

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2005 08:54 pm
dlowan wrote:
Narcissism must really hurt, you know.

No one knows like you do!

(Must've stung a bit for you to replay it. Filing....)

But, really, she says a few of the same things I was accused of racism for saying. Why the double standard? See what she says about the whoring, whiskey-sodden sheiks? I didn't get any deference or thoughtful consideration of that opinion when saying the same thing.

Do you believe her? Is she being racist?
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2005 08:59 pm
dlowan wrote:
goodfielder wrote:
That was a powerful piece - no way could it be edited, no way should it be.


Glad you liked it, too GF.

Any special bits that stood out for you?


Helie-Lucas.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2005 09:07 pm
goodfielder wrote:
dlowan wrote:
goodfielder wrote:
That was a powerful piece - no way could it be edited, no way should it be.


Glad you liked it, too GF.

Any special bits that stood out for you?


Helie-Lucas.


Yeah - she is fascinating isn't she?

I am googling for her now - and finding some interesting stuff.

Wish I had access to an academic web-search right now.


here is an interesting find:

http://www.duke.edu/web/eruditio/rutter.html

http://www.themodernreligion.com/ugly/ugly_women.htm


Still looking:

http://www.lines-magazine.org/Art_Aug03/Chulani.htm


http://www.indiana.edu/~iupress/books/0-253-31121-7tc.html
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2005 09:34 pm
I haven't read it yet, cross posting or I was off doing something else. I seem to be always here, but in fact am often wandering.

Orhan Parmuk is well regarded and dagnabbit I may have read him but not sure, but I also like a simple police procedural by ...

too bad, I've packed it.

A guy who is a turk investigator living in Germany, cool book.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 12:54 am
I found quite a few citations using google scholar dlowan - it might be useful.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 11:32 am
What Steve already said

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
the guy at Stockwell was being followed. He suddenly dived into the tube station was followed by special branch and ended his life on the floor of a northern line train with several bullets in his head.

if he was loaded with bombs we would have been told of this by now

like I said he was probably trying to use the tube without paying



Quote:
Shot man not connected to bombing

A man shot dead by police hunting the bombers behind Thursday's London attacks was unconnected to the incidents, police have confirmed.

A Scotland Yard statement said the shooting was a "tragedy" which was regretted by the Metropolitan Police.
source/full report
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 11:35 am
That was a hard bit of news. I knew it was possible, but I had extended the London police a bit more deference.

They hardly ever break the guns out---and I imagined they may be quite conservative in their use.

Wonder why they were tailing the boy, why he ran, why they shot.

It'll come out.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 11:42 am
Well, you can (could) watch such in nearly all European cities with underground trams/trains: some don't have a ticket, jump over the barriers, are followed by guards/transport police/security ...
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 02:26 pm
Thank you Ellpus and Nimh

And here is an editorial in Friday's Daily Telegraph

Telegraph Editorial

Excerpt wrote:
Two days after the atrocities of July 7, we congratulated British Muslim leaders for their patriotism. "None of the Islamic organisations was so tasteless as to try to add a 'but'," we said. No longer. Yesterday the "buts" were in full cry, with people lining up to suggest that the bombers had been forced into their terrible actions by the policies pursued by our own government.


This is not to say the muslim leaders in the UK who issued the fatwa the Ellpus link describes are among those who have begun to throw in the "buts," however my sense is that it is the abundance of qualifications accompanying the admonitions that leave so many without a sense of confidence in a widespread rejection of terror among muslim religious leaders worldwide.

I stand corrected on the absence of fatwas denouncing Bin Laden and terrorism and happily so, and I have never been one who has argued that Islam is, by its nature, a religion of hate and violence. I have also already acknowledged that I fully believe that there are very many muslims who do not support Islamic terrorism. The problem, as I see it, is that this is a time where moderate muslims cannot simply withhold support from terrorists, they must openly denounce them and assist in their eradication, and I'm just not sure that this is sufficiently the case.

The Pew Charitable Trust recently conducted a poll of muslims in countries both predominantly muslim and those that are not.

The story at their web site is titled "Support For Terror Wanes Among Muslim Publics"

While it is certainly a welcome sign that this support is waning, the question must be asked how it could ever have waxed in the first place.

Here are some of the polling data

To the statement "Violence against civilian targets is justified"

57% of Jordanians agreed that it was Often/Sometimes

39% of Lebanese

25% of Pakistanis

15% of Indonesians

14% of Turks

13% of Moroccans

These are the waning numbers

Characterizing people who are expressing concern for a seemingly inadequate response to Islamo-fascist terrorism by muslims as hate merchants is simply foolish.

The reality is that these numbers says far less about Islam than about those who claim to be adherents. Every religion has its fanatics and ignorant followers but the rest of the worlds major religions just doesn't seem to have as many as Islam, and for all the talk of ruthless Christian Crusaders and the past sins of The Church, there are currently no self-styled Christian organizations engaged in a worldwide campaign of killing innocents to advance their agendas, and I would again venture to say that if there were, moderate Christian citizens, in addition to their spiritual leaders, would be making far more noise than we hear from moderate muslims. The same for Judaism, Buddhism, Taoism or any other major religion.

Moderate muslims have a role to play in this drama, and I simply don't believe that they are accepting the responsibility that has been fairly or unfairly thrust upon them.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 02:49 pm
Update by the BBC (same link as above):


Quote:
The man, who died at Stockwell Tube on Friday, in an incident which Scotland Yard described as a "tragedy", has been named by police as Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, 27.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 04:06 pm
Omar Bakri: "I cannot be British. I cannot be English."

Quote:
He branded any Muslims who attended the Trafalgar Square vigil last week as "hypocrites and apostates". In an interview, Bakri said: "God forbids us from praying with Jews and Christians side by side. These are part-time Muslims or chocolate Muslims. I cannot be British. I cannot be English. Even if I change my colour, like Michael Jackson, I could not be English."


Whine on, Omar.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 06:04 pm
Jeez. Micheal Jackson has universal TVQ points.

Send Omar to Hell, somebody.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 06:25 pm
JustWonders wrote:
Omar Bakri: "I cannot be British. I cannot be English."

Quote:
He branded any Muslims who attended the Trafalgar Square vigil last week as "hypocrites and apostates". In an interview, Bakri said: "God forbids us from praying with Jews and Christians side by side. These are part-time Muslims or chocolate Muslims. I cannot be British. I cannot be English. Even if I change my colour, like Michael Jackson, I could not be English."


Whine on, Omar.


How can this utterly depraved idiot be the leader of anyone?

Morons leading the cretins
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 06:29 pm
...but not to be outdone, the press blames the Jews...

British police kill Brazilian in bomb probe blunder By Paul Majendie
25 minutes ago

LONDON (Reuters) - British police hunting London bombers admitted killing a Brazilian electrician by mistake -- a blunder that dealt a blow to their efforts to track down militants they fear could strike again.

ADVERTISEMENT

In another dramatic twist to the massive manhunt, police believe they may have established links between the teams of bombers who struck London twice.

Police hunting four men who tried to bomb London's transport system chased and shot dead a man on Friday who had been under surveillance and refused orders to halt.

Thursday's attempted attacks came two weeks after four suicide bombers killed 52 commuters in similar attacks.

Police expressed regret for the tragedy and named the innocent victim as Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year-old electrician who had been living in London for three years.

Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim demanded clarification from Britain about the shooting.

The victim's cousin, Lady Menezes, said: "It's an injustice, something needs to be done."

Security experts said police had clearly adopted a "shoot-to-kill" policy in confronting suspected bombers.

Anti-terrorism expert Robert Ayers of the Royal Institute of International Affairs said police have "demonstrated that they are operating on the premise right now that if they suspect that someone is a bomber, and that the public is going to be endangered by him, they have shoot-to-kill orders."

Massoud Shadjareh of the Islamic Human Rights Commission said the killing was a direct consequence of British police officers being sent to Israel to receive training on how to prevent suicide bombings.

"To give license to people to shoot to kill just like that, on the basis of suspicion, is very frightening," Azzam Tamimi of the Muslim Association of Britain said.

But former London police chief John Stevens defended the tactics.

"I sent teams to Israel and other countries hit by suicide bombers where we learned a terrible truth," he wrote in the News of the World.

"There is only one sure way to stop a suicide bomber determined to fulfil his mission -- destroy his brain instantly, utterly. That means shooting him with devastating power in the head, killing him immediately."

In one of the biggest police probes in British criminal history, security sources indicated there could be links between the two London attacks.

The sources, cited by British media, said two of the July 7 bombers attended a whitewater rafting trip at the same center in Wales as some of the July 21 bombers.

This was based on evidence discovered in rucksacks left behind by the failed bombers. Detectives believe the trip could have been used as a bonding exercise.

The Abu Hafs al Masri Brigade, an al Qaeda-linked group, has claimed responsibility for Thursday's bombing attempts and those of July 7, but the group's claims of responsibility for previous attacks in Europe have been discredited by security experts.

London's Mayor Ken Livingstone argued that terrorism was an international scourge that could strike anywhere and he was dismissive of the decision by Italian soccer club Inter Milan to cancel a pre-season tour of England.

"I think that it is a very silly thing to do because it is playing the terrorists' game. They want to change the way we live. The terrorists, I am sure, will be celebrating their decision," he said.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 06:29 pm
Yeah really, ranks right up there with Jerry Falwell.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 06:31 pm
Lash wrote:
...but not to be outdone, the press blames the Jews...

British police kill Brazilian in bomb probe blunder By Paul Majendie
25 minutes ago

LONDON (Reuters) - British police hunting London bombers admitted killing a Brazilian electrician by mistake -- a blunder that dealt a blow to their efforts to track down militants they fear could strike again.

ADVERTISEMENT

In another dramatic twist to the massive manhunt, police believe they may have established links between the teams of bombers who struck London twice.

Police hunting four men who tried to bomb London's transport system chased and shot dead a man on Friday who had been under surveillance and refused orders to halt.

Thursday's attempted attacks came two weeks after four suicide bombers killed 52 commuters in similar attacks.

Police expressed regret for the tragedy and named the innocent victim as Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year-old electrician who had been living in London for three years.

Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim demanded clarification from Britain about the shooting.

The victim's cousin, Lady Menezes, said: "It's an injustice, something needs to be done."

Security experts said police had clearly adopted a "shoot-to-kill" policy in confronting suspected bombers.

Anti-terrorism expert Robert Ayers of the Royal Institute of International Affairs said police have "demonstrated that they are operating on the premise right now that if they suspect that someone is a bomber, and that the public is going to be endangered by him, they have shoot-to-kill orders."

Massoud Shadjareh of the Islamic Human Rights Commission said the killing was a direct consequence of British police officers being sent to Israel to receive training on how to prevent suicide bombings.

"To give license to people to shoot to kill just like that, on the basis of suspicion, is very frightening," Azzam Tamimi of the Muslim Association of Britain said.

But former London police chief John Stevens defended the tactics.

"I sent teams to Israel and other countries hit by suicide bombers where we learned a terrible truth," he wrote in the News of the World.

"There is only one sure way to stop a suicide bomber determined to fulfil his mission -- destroy his brain instantly, utterly. That means shooting him with devastating power in the head, killing him immediately."

In one of the biggest police probes in British criminal history, security sources indicated there could be links between the two London attacks.

The sources, cited by British media, said two of the July 7 bombers attended a whitewater rafting trip at the same center in Wales as some of the July 21 bombers.

This was based on evidence discovered in rucksacks left behind by the failed bombers. Detectives believe the trip could have been used as a bonding exercise.

The Abu Hafs al Masri Brigade, an al Qaeda-linked group, has claimed responsibility for Thursday's bombing attempts and those of July 7, but the group's claims of responsibility for previous attacks in Europe have been discredited by security experts.

London's Mayor Ken Livingstone argued that terrorism was an international scourge that could strike anywhere and he was dismissive of the decision by Italian soccer club Inter Milan to cancel a pre-season tour of England.

"I think that it is a very silly thing to do because it is playing the terrorists' game. They want to change the way we live. The terrorists, I am sure, will be celebrating their decision," he said.


Who, in turn, have also been blamed for the bombing of the Egyptian resort.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 06:36 pm
dyslexia wrote:
Yeah really, ranks right up there with Jerry Falwell.


The ever glib dyslexia wades in.

Yours is a classic non-sequitor, unless, of course, you can provide evidence for the notion that Lash, Just Wonders or myself find Falwell the epitome of truth and wisdom.

Your penchant for one-liners has a hit rate of about 8% dys, and this one fell far off the mark.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 09:26 pm
I've often had questions about shoot to kill as a blanket department rule. (I'm from LA. Why can't they just wing the foot?)

But in this case I can understand, assuming they thought he came from the exact address of another suspect. (haven't read the news in the last few hours.) I can understand. It is pretty unfortunate though.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jul, 2005 09:28 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Update by the BBC (same link as above):
Quote:
The man, who died at Stockwell Tube on Friday, in an incident which Scotland Yard described as a "tragedy", has been named by police as Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, 27.

A photo has been released.

article
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jul, 2005 01:39 am
Quote:
Comment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isolated young men must join mainstream

Shahid Malik
Sunday July 24, 2005
The Observer

The events of the past two weeks have shocked Britons. The knowledge that there were young men, born and bred in my part of the country angry enough and fanatical enough to blow innocent commuters to pieces has been hard to digest.
Since it emerged that one of the suicide bombers of 7 July, widely assumed to have been the ringleader, was from Dewsbury in West Yorkshire, many people have asked me: what elements in my constituency could have spawned such radicalism? What influences could lead a husband and father, a primary school assistant to detonate a bomb, killing seven innocent people and himself in the process?

Apart from pointing out the obvious - that Mohammad Sidique Khan was born in Leeds, attended mosques there, and only moved to Dewsbury recently - I have to tell people that none of us in Dewsbury can understand it either.

It is true that some young Muslims in my constituency have been angered, and frustrated by what they see as the double standards of the 'West' in relation to international Muslim areas of conflict: Palestine, Kashmir, Afghanistan, Iraq or Chechnya.

There is a feeling of alienation, often isolation; a feeling that somehow you don't belong; a feeling made much more acute by the fact that the party that came second in last year's local elections - ahead of Labour [the BNP] - says it wants an 'all-white Britain'. No wonder young Muslims who travel to Pakistan come back with a sense of belonging and an inner peace that eludes them in their own country.

None of this is meant to justify or excuse terrorist actions. Those of us in leadership roles must make it clear to our young people that in a democracy the way we express such feelings is by debate and through democratic institutions, not through violence. We must drag them into the political mainstream.

The attacks of 7 July have shown us the danger that words can become deadly deeds. We must confront head-on those few who preach violence and hatred in the name of Islam and, in doing so, poison the minds of vulnerable young men.

When I, and other British Muslims voiced condemnation of extremists in the past, we feared giving ammunition to far-right extremists. Equally, some feared stoking up tensions within the community.

Hence, when I challenged the perceived status quo within Britain's 1.8 million-strong Muslim community I expected to provoke a wave of disapproval. But it seems I tapped into a nerve. Challenging the community to confront this evil gained widespread approval from everyone except extremists.

For British Muslims there is a sense of relief. We are no longer in denial. We will no longer pretend not to see or hear the fanatical few who stand outside our mosques, polluting young minds. The events of 7 July have changed that. The choices are stark yet clear - we either confront the enemy within, or are seen to condone.

On 14 July I stood with some of my constituents outside Khan's home in Dewsbury to observe a two-minute silence in memory of his victims. In doing so we sent a powerful message: the battle for the hearts and souls of British Muslims, here in Dewsbury and across the country, has truly begun.

ยท Shahid Malik is MP for Dewsbury
Source
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/04/2025 at 12:52:45