Thank you Ellpus and Nimh
And here is an editorial in Friday's Daily Telegraph
Telegraph Editorial
Excerpt wrote:Two days after the atrocities of July 7, we congratulated British Muslim leaders for their patriotism. "None of the Islamic organisations was so tasteless as to try to add a 'but'," we said. No longer. Yesterday the "buts" were in full cry, with people lining up to suggest that the bombers had been forced into their terrible actions by the policies pursued by our own government.
This is not to say the muslim leaders in the UK who issued the fatwa the Ellpus link describes are among those who have begun to throw in the "buts," however my sense is that it is the abundance of qualifications accompanying the admonitions that leave so many without a sense of confidence in a widespread rejection of terror among muslim religious leaders worldwide.
I stand corrected on the absence of fatwas denouncing Bin Laden and terrorism and happily so, and I have never been one who has argued that Islam is, by its nature, a religion of hate and violence. I have also already acknowledged that I fully believe that there are very many muslims who do not support Islamic terrorism. The problem, as I see it, is that this is a time where moderate muslims cannot simply withhold support from terrorists, they must openly denounce them and assist in their eradication, and I'm just not sure that this is sufficiently the case.
The Pew Charitable Trust recently conducted a poll of muslims in countries both predominantly muslim and those that are not.
The story at their web site is titled "Support For Terror Wanes Among Muslim Publics"
While it is certainly a welcome sign that this support is waning, the question must be asked how it could ever have waxed in the first place.
Here are some of the polling data
To the statement "Violence against civilian targets is justified"
57% of Jordanians agreed that it was Often/Sometimes
39% of Lebanese
25% of Pakistanis
15% of Indonesians
14% of Turks
13% of Moroccans
These are the
waning numbers
Characterizing people who are expressing concern for a seemingly inadequate response to Islamo-fascist terrorism by muslims as
hate merchants is simply foolish.
The reality is that these numbers says far less about Islam than about those who claim to be adherents. Every religion has its fanatics and ignorant followers but the rest of the worlds major religions just doesn't seem to have as many as Islam, and for all the talk of ruthless Christian Crusaders and the past sins of The Church, there are currently no self-styled Christian organizations engaged in a worldwide campaign of killing innocents to advance their agendas, and I would again venture to say that if there were, moderate Christian citizens, in addition to their spiritual leaders, would be making far more noise than we hear from moderate muslims. The same for Judaism, Buddhism, Taoism or any other major religion.
Moderate muslims have a role to play in this drama, and I simply don't believe that they are accepting the responsibility that has been fairly or unfairly thrust upon them.