burning question?
Zane wrote:Thoughts, anyone, on the Paula Abdul-Corey Clark situation?
John Quinones is a correspondent for the ABC News newsmagazines. He has reported on the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping case, the plight of conjoined twins, and the search for the notorious Zodiac killer. Now he asks the burning question:
"Can this possibly be true?" Quinones asks with urgent indignation, "A naive and perpetually broke young man of no fixed address who didn’t own a car or even a cellphone <gasp>, and yet he says he ‘chills’ with a wealthy superstar in a Beverly Hills mansion?"
How does that qualify as a hard-hitting, journalistic question?
Corey Clark is an opportunistic scumbag. What's ABC's excuse for giving this LOSER an hour-long nationally televised platform? That's not difficult to figure out: Sour grapes. The producers of American Idol offered the show to ABC first. ABC rejected the offer. (Not very bright, but ABC executives aren't exactly known for their brilliant programming.) American Idol was then offered to the underdog FOX network, became one of the highest rated shows in history, and put FOX on equal footing with the big three (ABC, NBC, and CBS). Sour grapes. Network politics. (or "Paulatics," the name of the song being promoted by loser Corey Clark.)
As I stated on another thread: Boys who kiss -- or allegedly kiss -- and tell are LOSERS. The only thing that loser can expect in his future are about a million doors being slammed in his face. He has proven if anyone extends him a helping hand, he'll bite it, distort it, and then try to peddle it for money.
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1319423#1319423
Paula, Simon, and Randy make American Idol the success that it is. If you remove any one of them from the equation, the show will no longer have the magic that enthralls millions. ABC's ridiculous attempt to bring down its competition has failed. ABC PrimeTime Live's "Fallen Idol" was a laughable piece of tabloid news. It had more holes in it than swiss cheese.