fishin' wrote:That is entirely YOUR opinion. You've managed to develop a fairly significant mental profile of a relationship involving two people that you've never personally seen and only have one persons limited input on.
Fishin:
That's what divorce lawyers do . . . they use words to portray pictures for the court to envision . . . and as you can see, Mit gets quite defensive and reels out more rope wherein more reasonable inferences can be made. He even gets huffy when these things are pointed out to him. His wife's divorce attorney will LOVE that when he/she gets Mit on the stand. He can be provoked into shows of indignation. He might have gone to law school, but that doesn't necessarily give him the edge and prepare him to be a defendant in a divorce action.
Mit either has to commit to his marriage or face divorce court. I didn't place him in that position, but that's the position he is in. And if he goes into divorce court . . . he has only had a sampling here of how his wife's divorce attorney is going to present him and it's not a favorable picture. She can subpoena his online gambling records; she can subpoena his records from the online poker service and probably show that he not only gambles on an average of 2 hours a day at home, but probably several hours a day or week from his office. And that's only the beginning.
Mit needs to look forward and determine if the divorce road is the one he wants to travel . . . and if I've helped him to see the disadvantages of traveling that road . . . maybe my comments will help him to choose a better road.
And, you're a very nice person. If Mit ends up traveling the divorce road, I hope he has good people and supportive friends like you in his corner because it's going to be a hard road to travel.
Best wishes.