I'm sure that OfCC was as mad at the fact the guy got busted as they were thrilled to find out who he was.
cjhsa wrote:I'm sure that OfCC was as mad at the fact the guy got busted as they were thrilled to find out who he was.
If this is confirmable, why isn't anyone else covering it? I'd imagine a lot of American media would find this a great story.
cjhsa wrote:Sorry Tico, I didn't see your earlier post.
Not all .... I definitely think this topic deserved a thread of its own, as evidenced by the discussion we've been having.
Remember the evil media has a left leaning bias.
They will protect their spokesman :wink:
Aha, so he wasn't Moore's personal bodyguard and the gun in question was unloaded and in his luggage. A lot of sound and fury signifying nothing.
Excuse me? As stated by the NRA spokesman, "based on emperical evidence, it's the height of hypocrisy".
I'd have to agree. The story also points out the problem with the lack of reciprocation regarding CCW licenses from state to state. There should be some way to have a national CCW over and above state issued ones. This has been batted around, especially for active as well as inactive LEO's. New York's gun laws are draconian.
An NRA spokesman? Don't make me laugh.
(You're roiling up a pot that's full of ****).
Well, now that there's more info coming out on this - the title of the thread looks even sillier.
There are Dan Rathers on the right!
From the msnbc.com article:
"When asked to comment Thursday on the arrest of Moore's bodyguard, NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam said: "Based on empirical evidence, this is the height of hypocrisy.""
What part of this don't you understand LW?
And what makes the thread look silly ehbeth? The guy got busted, with a gun, in a state where they don't like guns. Explain.
The gun was in a suitcase, it was a company hire by Moore's assitants (it was not his personal bodyguard) and the gun was unloaded. What part of that don't you understand? Have another cocktail, go to bed and call me in the morning. The NRA spokesman should be equally embarassed.
I give up. If you guys can't see the obvious hypocrisy in this, then there's no point in me arguing it, because you are blinded by your love of Moore (that's more with a "moo").
You're blinded by your hatred. I don't particularly love Moore but I'm glad he exists to give the other side of the story.
I'll agree that I hate Moore, and not just because of F9/11. He's a turd with legs.
There you go -- no rational argument available to you so you resort to childish name calling. To be expected.
None needed, the guy is an argument against himself.
