Phoenix32890 wrote:Not exactly a disinterested mainstream news source, but interesting, nonetheless!
Quote:Update: I'd like to expand upon this thought, and I'd specifically like Moore fans to comment on it. One of Mikey's big claims is that the threat of terrorism is statistically insignificant when compared to the risks of everyday life, and that our fear of terrorism has been manufactured by the government and the media. If we accept that postulate as true, then what do we make of Moore's armed guard? How many celebrities have been killed by stalkers? John Lennon, but that was almost a quarter-century ago. There was Rebecca Schaffer, from that 80s sitcom My Sister Sam. Can anyone think of any others? So, let's say that in the last 20 years five celebrities have been killed by stalkers. If you look at the numbers, your chances of being killed by a terrorist are exponentially higher than Michael Moore's are of being killed by a member of the public. So, is Moore's armed guard a byproduct of his irrational fear of being attacked? If so, who is perpetuating this fear? And if you feel that Mikey's fears are well-founded, please explain why. If you look at the numbers his chances of getting killed by a member of the public are miniscule compared to his chances of, say, dying from obesity-related heart disease. Yet he isn't walking around with a cardiologist, is he? Why do you think that is?
Update 2: I just thought of one more example: Larry Flynt. He's a pretty good example of someone like Moore, who was proudly controversial and was attacked for it, even though he didn't end up dying. But how long ago was Flynt shot? 1978? So that was even before John Lennon. Astounding, isn't it, that Moore is so paranoid and such a victim of the culture of fear that he feels the need to be followed everywhere by a trained killer.
http://moorewatch.com/index.php/weblog/comments/928/
When was the last time a President of the US was
killed by an angry or unstable citizen, guerrilla, or rogue terrorist?
Does the disguisting display of military might by GWB at the innauguration seem any more or less appropriate because so few presidents have actually been murdered?
The implication of the above exerpt makes no sense.