@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:
Every week, the differences between Trump and Hillary Clinton get more and more obvious. Hillary would never have responded to White Supremacist violence by condemning "violence on every side".
Well you're right about that which is why she would have made a horrible president.
There
was violence committed by both sides. Is it wrong to condemn violence on every side or is some violence OK? As long as no one is killed, violence is OK? Violence unaccompanied by racist rhetoric is OK? How did condemning the violence on both sides condone the worst act of violence? Was it somehow an insult to the young woman who lost her life?
Help me out here max. Other than providing the Resistance with a reason to criticize Trump, what precisely was the significance of condemning violence on both sides. Since it was such an egregious act by Trump it should be pretty easily explained.
Oh I know that the Resistance assumes Trump did it so that he wouldn't offend his white supremacist base, but how does including Antifa violence in his condemnation let the white supremacists off the hook? Or was he trying to appeal to people like me who believe the violence on both sides should be condemned, and if so, what's wrong with that? Am I wrong in my condemnation?
Obviously none of the violence on the Antifa side resulted in someone losing their life, but it could have. You keep tossing bottles and M-80s into crowds, setting off tear gas grenades, starting fires and pulling people out of cars and beating them and sooner or later someone is going to get seriously hurt or killed. We can't allow left-wing brown shirts to run amok at demonstrations simply because they didn't come with the intention of killing anyone. I don't believe the Hate Groups did either.
From all of the videos I've seen, the rest of the violence, and there was plenty, was at least equally distributed.
None of it should have happened and it
all should be condemned.
Tragically, two volatile group of violent thugs came in close proximity and a young woman paid a terrible price for wanting her voice to be heard condemning racism. Why is it that the people who deserve to die far more than the ones who do, always seem to skate?
There were numerous villains in that city this weekend, but chief among them, I believe, were the city officials who, from the outset didn't properly plan for or react to the growing tension and turmoil and, far far worse, gave the police the word to run for cover and abandon their posts once the pot began to boil over.
Do you agree, and if so why do you think it went down this way? Same question if you don't agree.
Neo-Nazis and the KKK have marched in the streets of American cities before, and if I'm not mistaken, the Klan previously marched through Charlottesville at least once before. Whenever these group gather and march, the police usually spend most of their time protecting the KKK or Neo-Nazis from the counter-demonstrators, but aside from perhaps a couple of Klansmen getting hit with a thrown rock or rotten cabbage, what we saw this weekend (even excluding the heinous vehicular attack) has not happened. Perhaps combining the hate groups somehow made them more volatile and/or the presence of Antifa shock troops fresh from triumphs in Berkeley and Portland did so. Still, to me the biggest reason is the way the police responded, which is to say
not responding.
The city police and state troopers were not likely to turn tail and run of their own volition and in defiance of orders, and if they were motivated to give preference to one side over the other you would expect to see them joining forces with the white supremacists to fight the Antifa or visa versa.
The city knew from experience how to handle an event involving both a demonstration and a counter-demonstration. Charlottesville may not be a major city, but it's not a rural one horse town either. It certainly looks like someone deliberately chose not to handle the situation as the city could have and should have. Why might that be so? Who had something to gain from a demonstration turning into a riot, and what did they have to gain?