@Lash,
Yeah, you’re right.
I wrote:
Many times here, because there is such a cacophony of voices that all say the same thing, I don’t add mine. Sometimes I do.
I don’t see the value in piling on when 90% of the people here are saying the same thing. Right or wrong, I see great value in voicing a different perspective.
Sometimes, because it’s completely my opinion—sometimes because I think it should be said by someone.
————————————-
I looked back to see what I said about the Giffords shooting.
I basically said the bullseye ad was in very poor taste, but I was more interested in the speech aspect. I think the person who raises their hand against someone else is completely responsible for the crime they committed, but my opinion about this started morphing during Trump’s campaign.
I watched video showing him explicitly asking his audience to slug people who did certain things. Some protesters at the event were asked to leave, and as they did, an audience member slugged a guy walking out.
That’s explicit incitement to violence. I think trump could be sued for that.
The bullseyes aren’t quite as explicit (with language), but in retrospect, I think a suit against the individual who paid for that ad would help to define incitement to violence.
I have been a pretty single-minded proponent of as free a form of speech as possible. The current climate in the US is testing ‘incitement to violence’ for me.