yeah but sometimes, don't you just wanna f*ck and not put in all the work of making love? Perhaps I am alone here (female wise) but sometimes I just want to get off! Screw all that romantic love making crap. Just f*ck me.
Up against the wall,
going down
in an elevator,
It's a Wednesday,
hump day.
All banged up,
nothing to show
but a beautiful glow.
<Okay, it's only Monday, but I cry poetic licence>
Montana wrote:I didn't mean to come off as sounding like a bitch, nimh and I apologize if I did.
You never sound like a bitch, Montana! <smiles>
Montana wrote:What I read in the novels every so often are about 2 people making love to eachother and not f*cking like they do in porn. There's a world of difference there. [..] Porn is just sex with no meaning.
But they're both external sources of excitement one dips into to, eh, invigorate oneself ... in
that sense, they're alike, they are used for the same kind of impulse that way (by some), even if one is cruder in appearance than the other - thats all that was being said, I think ...
Kristie wrote:yeah but sometimes, don't you just wanna f*ck and not put in all the work of making love? Perhaps I am alone here (female wise) but sometimes I just want to get off! Screw all that romantic love making crap. Just f*ck me.
All in favor say I
I...iiiii........iIIIIIII OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>ahh<
yeah baby.
Voting for the rolling O, however it is achieved.
Faster or slower, it's a good thing
I've just done a quick read of this thread, and agree with a lot, especially on ehBeth's last post.
On the reading business, part of my learning I was a sexual being, years ago, was from reading a scene in the Virginian, a western. And then I read some Zane Grey books. (There were all that were available in my aunt's house, those and Reader's Digest and the Liguorian.) If I found that scene in the Virginian, now, it would be beyond me to say why it was an awakening type scene.. no sexual movement in it, but it tapped into my then asleep imagination, and that is the essence of what folks are trying to say to explain the connection between romance novels and porn.
Back when these threads started to show up, Nimh wrote a lengthy explanatory and fairly kind post on how it is for a guy. I'd like to go back and find that, since I keep seeing that that post would be handy to use in a lot of these porn questions.
OssoB, I suspect we'd cause some havoc if we hit the town together.
Kristie wrote:yeah but sometimes, don't you just wanna f*ck and not put in all the work of making love? Perhaps I am alone here (female wise) but sometimes I just want to get off! Screw all that romantic love making crap. Just f*ck me.
I call that sex Maintenance Sex.
ehBeth wrote:OssoB, I suspect we'd cause some havoc if we hit the town together.
Oh look, there goes ping and pong!
Yeah, but you know I'd only attract the pervs that like the elderly..
not that I am soooooo elderly.
Kristie wrote:yeah but sometimes, don't you just wanna f*ck and not put in all the work of making love? Perhaps I am alone here (female wise) but sometimes I just want to get off! Screw all that romantic love making crap. Just f*ck me.
LOL! You're too funny
I never thought of making love as work, but just having meaningless sex to me is work. I've been on both sides and just plain sex doesn't do it for me.
nimh wrote:Montana wrote:I didn't mean to come off as sounding like a bitch, nimh and I apologize if I did.
You never sound like a bitch, Montana! <smiles>
Montana wrote:What I read in the novels every so often are about 2 people making love to eachother and not f*cking like they do in porn. There's a world of difference there. [..] Porn is just sex with no meaning.
But they're both external sources of excitement one dips into to, eh, invigorate oneself ... in
that sense, they're alike, they are used for the same kind of impulse that way (by some), even if one is cruder in appearance than the other - thats all that was being said, I think ...
I see what you mean, but there is so little actual love making in the novels that I read and it isn't even very detailed, so this is why I think relating it to porn is absurd.
Montana, I think we all understand that you don't feel the romance novels you read are porn, or have anything in common with porn, or have any of the same benefits of porn.
In the meantime, meaningless sex can be excellent sex. I kinda miss the late 1970's, before you had to think about sex.
I thought about sex in the late seventies!
Even when I was doing it!
Well, there's thinking about it, and thinking about it.
Pong is agreeing with Ping here.
Cav Wrote:
Quote:Up against the wall,
going down
in an elevator,
It's a Wednesday,
hump day.
All banged up,
nothing to show
but a beautiful glow.
<Okay, it's only Monday, but I cry poetic licence>
the reason I love Canadians
:wink:
ehBeth wrote:
In the meantime, meaningless sex can be excellent sex. I kinda miss the late 1970's, before you had to think about sex.
Actually...I don't think any sex is "meaningless"...but I understand both Montana and you when you use that expression.
And I most assuredly agree that sex...the kind you are referring to as "meaningless"...can be both satisfying and rewarding.
I think most of us like sex best when it is with someone we love very much and are loved in return...but to suggest in any way that the only kind of sex that can be "meaningful" is sex that occurs under those ideal circumstances...is to put way too fine an edge on things.
That having been said, however...
...to each his (or her) own!
