Special Counsel for Russia Election Interference: Robert Mueller.

maxdancona wrote:

There is a general consensus that Russia meddled in the US election.

Only amongst ignorant people...

They may end up having to either build some colossal new demoperv prison or empty out all of America's normal prisons for demopervs. Either that or simply wall off some section of the Grand Canyon on two sides and heave the demopervs in. They could put stainless steel bars 4 inches apart on the bottom of the thing so that the Colorado River could still flow without letting any of the demopervs loose

You must read more about this stuff than I do. Cigars? Oh, never mind.

I've got a good book going instead.

sounds like the Brownshorts live. Why not round up everyone who has a little Democrat in them and just develop some kind of final solution

Brandon9000 wrote:

izzythepush wrote:

Enough to get Flynn sacked, for Sessions to recuse himself and for a panic stricken Trump to dismiss Comey and subsequently threaten him. No smoke without fire, and there's enough smoke to keep us in kippers for the rest of the millennium.

And yet you don't tell us even one result from the investigation.

As well, plausible arguments can and have been made that:

that is, have a voting booth in which a snowflake voter would no sooner mark his/her ballot for the latest incarnation of HDK (Hildeabeast Dindu KKKlintler), then a trap door would open beneath the snowflakes feet, he/she would go straight through the floor, there would be a muffled zapping sound, and the remains would go straight up the chimney. That would require nothing much more than a 40 or 50 foot version of one of the little bug zapper's which you buy at Walmart, and a little bit of engineering creativity. The benefit to the country's basic gene pool would be

Wow, in many other fora, you could get bounced for preaching violence and hate like that. have you EVER read the US Constitution? (I think not because its too "snowflakey" for you brownshorts)

I wouldnt go getting serious with your brownshorts friends.

sounds like the Brownshorts live. Why not round up everyone who has a little Democrat in them and just develop some kind of final solution

Well that's the last time I weigh in on one of your arguments.

Just curious who is offended by Trump talking about grabbing pussy and not so much by Clinton sticking cigars in there.

Quote:

Just curious who is offended by Trump talking about grabbing pussy and not so much by Clinton sticking cigars in there.

I don't particularly want to hear about the details of anyone's sexual activities; I happen to believe in the concept of personal privacy. However, no one — including the victimized Ms. Lewinsky — has ever suggested that the activities in the Oval Office were non-consensual. Mr. Trump, on the other hand, bragged about his ability to sexually assault women so yes, I do find that a bit more offensive.

At some point, it would be nice if every expression of disgust or outrage concerning Mr. Trump's behavior, intellect, character, or political misdeeds weren't answered with the knee jerk response, "Well, Clinton (Obama, LBJ, FDR) did it too and it was worse!" You should know by now that you can pretty much scratch any human being and find a hypocrite. It's how we're made. We can overlook less than admirable traits in friends and acquaintances if these lapses don't significantly affect the other characteristics of the relationship which we value. I've worked with drunks, bigots, and deadbeat dads and as long as their moral failings didn't work to the detriment of the job in terms of safety, quality, and productivity I couldn't really care less.

It's pretty easy to dig up **** on politicians. They work in a human zoo, after all.

Do you imagine Trump just walking down 5th ave grabbing every woman in arms reach by the crotch?

After 8 years of "Bush/Reagan Did It!" you'll have to wait for awhile before that dies down.

Gregg Jarrett: What is Robert Mueller investigating (since collusion is not a crime)?

Robert Mueller is tasked with finding a crime that does not exist in the law. It is a legal impossibility.

Colluding with Russia is not, under America’s criminal codes, a crime. It’s just not there.

Perhaps someday Congress will pass a law criminalizing such conduct in political campaigns. But for now, there is not a single statute outlawing collaboration with a foreign government in a U.S. presidential election. Or any election, for that matter.

Under the law granting him legal authority (28 CFR 600), a special counsel is charged with investigating crimes. Only crimes. Nothing else. He has limited jurisdiction. Any other wrongdoing uncovered in the investigation which does not rise to the level of a criminal offense cannot even be made public by the special counsel. That is the law.

=====

Any Related Matters:

Mueller’s probe will inevitably morph into an investigation of President Trump’s meeting with James Comey and his subsequent firing of the FBI Director.

If the president told Comey he hopes former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn can be cleared because “he’s a good guy,” it is not enough to sustain an obstruction charge. Hoping or wishing for an outcome is not the same as influencing, obstructing or impeding. Nor is firing the FBI Director. As Comey himself admitted, the president has the constitutional authority to fire him for any reason or no reason at all.

Furthermore, the term “corruptly” is specifically defined under18 USC 1515(b) as “acting with an improper purpose, including making a false or misleading statement, or withholding, concealing, altering, or destroying a document or other information.” The president’s actions do not come close to satisfying the requirements of acting corruptly.