[quote="Ticomaya
Bad news for the world, MK. It appears you are happy to have this guy, the visible leader of al Qaeda, remain alive. Says quite a bit about you.
Though I would like to hear the results of the forensic tests before reaching the conclusion it wasn't him.[/quote]
I don't find anything "happy" about all the innocent people who have been murdered in my name. I know from all the evidence that has turned up the past few years that the terrorist threats are greatly increased thanks to the lies & the illegal war. That is nothing to be happy about.
It's certainly not amusing that so many people spend so much time making excuses for the lies, deceit, cheating & murdering being done by the squatter in the oval office..... Who apparently think that it's ok to bankrupt this country by running up a two trillion $$$$ bill for this obscene war.
What have the great ones accomplished? Practically nothing.... Four years spent searching for a guy hooked to a dialysis machine and his little old geezer who slinks around the mountains of Afghanistan. You're right. It's not funny that so many people are dead, two countries are sand piles, the murdering continues and we can't catch those two.
And the best you can do Tico is to make a snide comment about what you believe that I think. That says a lot about you.
The fact is that I don't give a hoot about that gang of thugs in Aghanistan. What I do care about is what that gang of thugs in & around the oval office are doing to this country. They are the world's worst terrorists.
Magginkat and Crazy Harry Belafonte.
Lash wrote:Magginkat and Crazy Harry Belafonte.
Someone has to have some common sense.
Anon
Anon-Voter wrote:Lash wrote:Magginkat and Crazy Harry Belafonte.
Someone has to have some common sense.
Anon
Yes, and if either of them find someone with common sense, I hope they'll listen to him.
Lash wrote:Anon-Voter wrote:Lash wrote:Magginkat and Crazy Harry Belafonte.
Someone has to have some common sense.
Anon
Yes, and if either of them find someone with common sense, I hope they'll listen to him.
One things for sure, "his" name won't be Lash.
Wonder why Lash thinks it has to a a "him"?
It's Chrissee #9.
Meanwhile--
Juan Williams gives the low down on Crazy Harry, and his loyal disciple, Magginman.
WILLIAMS: But here's what's happened. Here's what's happened. He's become like, you know, Chairman Mao used to march people out of the party because they didn't go along with party doctrine. That's what he's become. When he's going after people like Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, he's trying to push people who are good people now out because they're not his kind of black people, that's crazy.
He has become a left wing Archie Bunker. He's, you know, your people worry about Pat Robertson on the right trying to assassinate, you know, saying we should assassinate Hugo Chavez or we should go after some town in Pennsylvania that doesn't agree with intelligent design. That's what Harry Belafonte has become to the left, this curmudgeon, this bitter old man. And it's just sad to see it happen.
_________________________
Bitter old man. You should find a better role model.
Foxfyre wrote:... and this story will be changing a
lot over the next several days.
Until now the only changes are what media where report the number of protesters throughout Pakistan: from some thousand to some tenthousands and hundredthousands. (Videos seem to prove that the it's at least a huuuge number.)
On the local scene, I was listening to commentary this morning that
a) If we did get the big guy, and the Pakistanis got to him first, it is unlikely they would acknowledge it but would rather transport him over the border into Afghanistan to avoid Muslim reprisals in their own country
b) That the Pakistani intelligence worked closely with US intelligence on this one but again this is not being widely reported again to not incite Muslim anger.
c) It is not confirmed or unconfirmed that we got him.
And these reports will no doubt change again by tomorrow.
Foxfyre wrote:
c) It is not confirmed or unconfirmed that we got him.
And these reports will no doubt change again by tomorrow.
Well, it happened in PAKISTAN. And they (= the government) say: no.
Those, he obviously did it say what's your point
c).
41 is paying a visit there today.
Maybe he can help clear things up
<Go Dad>
Walter Hinteler wrote:Foxfyre wrote:
c) It is not confirmed or unconfirmed that we got him.
And these reports will no doubt change again by tomorrow.
Well, it happened in PAKISTAN. And they (= the government) say: no.
Those, he obviously did it say what's your point
c).
They don't have to admit that he was in Pakistan however. My point is this is what is being reported here today and that no doubt the reports will be different tomorrow. Which is what I believe I said.
What is your point?
The Pakistanis are annoyed. Can you believe that?
All we did was invade their space without permission, and fire a missile that killed some of their citizens.
Anyone can make a mistake. These people are so ungrateful.
It's a good job we're on their side. I expect the government will be able to calm the protesters down, once they explain to them that it's all in a good cause, and nobody's perfect.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,16937,1686918,00.html
The Wiretappers That Couldn't Shoot Straight By FRANK RICH
The president who once promised to bring a "culture of responsibility" to Washington can and will blame The Times and the rest of the press for his failures.
If fictional terrorists concocted by Hollywood can figure out that the National Security Agency is listening to their every call, guess what? Real-life terrorists know this, too. So when a hyperventilating President Bush rants that the exposure of his warrant-free wiretapping in a newspaper is shameful and puts "our citizens at risk" by revealing our espionage playbook, you have to wonder what he is really trying to hide. Our enemies, as America has learned the hard way, are not morons. Even if Al Qaeda hasn't seen "Sleeper Cell" because it refuses to spring for pay cable, it has surely assumed from the get-go that the White House would ignore legal restraints on eavesdropping, just as it has on detainee jurisprudence and torture.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010806C.shtml
I'm sure, you'll fit in!
He said about his ideal girl:
Quote: "The ideal woman is a mixture.
"She should have NICOLE KIDMAN's laughter, then the personality of JULIA ROBERTS and the aspect of Michelle Pfeiffer, the quintessence of beauty.
"And finally the ambition of JENNIFER LOPEZ."
It's probable (responding to JW's cartoon post) that OBL and some other senior al-Quaida members are hiding NE Pakistan, but the question is, should we be blowing up occupied buildings in the hope of killing some of them?
