tico:
Quote:I read liberal crap every day. I ascertain it's crap, and summarily disregard it. You seem to think I'm obligated to post liberal crap here, and because I don't, have concluded I'm only interested in reading that which shares my ideological viewpoint. I'm not sure why you continue to try and make this point.
If liberal, therefore crap? If conservative, therefore valid? This formulation alone ought to give you the reason I continue to try and make a particular point.
Rather than using partisan membership as the test for sensibility or intellectual merit, why not use some more exacting standard? The piece I criticized has a critical failing in its logic. And it's a pretty obvious failing. You ought to have caught it.
Quote:You don't suffer from a misapprehension about the of articles posted on townhall.com -- you have been critical of their conservative slant in the past. It (like Newsmax, National Review, Weekly Standard, and others) is unabashedly conservative ... it doesn't pretend to be unbiased, unlike salon.com and the other sources you cite.
Sources are either liberal or they are conservative? There's a left wing media and a right wing media and they sit in eternally opposing balance? There is naught else nor can be else?
I have not been critical of Townhall, Newsmax, and the Washington Times because they have a conservative
slant, but because they are in operation specifically and totally to forward ONE partisan view. It is their reason for being. That situation is described with the word 'propaganda'.
I'm not sure how old you are, but discourse in American politics has not always been as it is now. The notion that you seem to hold - that the mainstream media is overwhelmingly pro-democrat, thus justifying a countering media solidly pro-republican - is not a notion that stands up to any careful scrutiny (eg, stats on editorial page support for Republican or Democrat presidential candidates).
The fundamental problem that arises when too many people begin to believe that journalism must inevitably be either right wing or left wing, and that partisan bias is pervasive AND INSURMOUNTABLE, is that careful regard to facts and logic becomes functionally unnecessary - the 'truth of things' is established by another criterion...if it is from your side, it's true and if it's from the other side, it's false.
In the broad picture of political discourse in the US, this element is, I think, the most destructive and most dangerous to your democracy.
If you find a piece anywhere which you think gets at the truth, post it. But then encourage some follow through which serves to check and critique it. I'll certainly be happy to do the same.