Thomas wrote:I'm surprised to see you so critical of "The Roundtable", this invitation-only backroom of A2K that specifically started out as a safe haven for our Republican members. As I remember, you were a member of this forum-within-the-forum long before it opened up to members as left-wing as myself or nimh. I disagree the members there were sissies, and have only fond memories of the discussions there. You are being way too hard on your fellow conservatives.
I wasn't being critical of the roundtable. Got an invite, visited it found it populated with a set of relatively thoughtful and knowledgable people and relatively free of the cacophony of the then very dominant majority of very vocal, very liberal posters on the other threads. Very interesting for a while, but after everything was said it soon became monotone and dull. I was dimly aware of the exclusivity and, apart from the subsequent fresh air of other, new viewpoints, was hardly aware if the change. I recall yoiu and Nimh as very interesting and challenging contributors who added to my enjoyment.
I suppose this involves some measure of hypocricy on my part. I accept it. However, I am unashamedly guilty of numerous other instances of political incorrectitude: I'm a member of a men only private club that is a frequent target of liberal attacks; I'll attend the restored Tailhook convention later this month; and I frequently overlook the convoluted euphamisms that increasingly constitute correct speech. Worse, I don't feel bad about it.
I am convinced that this thread will be improved for almost everyone here if we abandon the stupid prejudgements and labels that would deny entry of contributors who see things differently. I found the one from which I was so brusquely expelled for my (admitted) insensitivity, laughably smarmy and inverted. In fact I didn't even detect the meaning of the earlier, somewhat subtle suggestions that I (and others) buzz off. It just didn't seem possible that they could be serious about it. Wrong again.