0
   

The continued reference to Mary Cheney by the Dems

 
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:26 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
and there is the irresponsibilty Lash...someone on page 11 of this thread reads you talking of the Kerry daughters abortions and never goes to page 12 to hear you say you don't know if they ever really had an abortion....they just tell a few friends you know I read today that the Kerry daughters have had abortions.......
Shocked Don't let Dan Rather get ahold of this! Laughing

(Really Bear, you're overdramatic act is doing a shotty job of obscuring her very valid point. Idea)


first of all it's shoddy(rhymes with snotty though), and its your not you're(more snottiness) and I don't think Lash has a valid point but I will concede that I'm being overly dramatic....employing that strategy to expose the silliness of the argument........

PS the snottiness is in fun big guy :wink:
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:30 pm
Do you know what the Bushies are really afraid of? Losing rock-ribbed conservative Bible-beater votes. In the teenytiny brains of the fundamentalist believer there is that thing that says "I cannot be part of anything that is tainted by sin."

To them, homosexuality is a sin and the mere mention of it and it's connection to the VP might be enough, not to get them to vote for John Kerry, let's not kid ourselves, but it just might be enough to get them to stay home on election day.

So what does the VP and his wife do? They act as if their daughter was a strayling and they are just the victims of the sin. "Oh," say the dried up brethren, "they see the error of their lost daughter and we share their shame."

Which is nuts, of course, Ms. Cheney will go back to her job at Coors on Monday by which time this will have all died down.

We ought to keep track here of which party tries to raise the most distractions from the important issues of day and which one talks about them. Has anyone seen a statement from the President regarding the coming emergency vote on the budget limits that he sneered at Kerry for voting for in the past. Jes asking.

Joe
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:32 pm
Kerry will use any diversion available to him to keep voters from thinking of his miserable Senate record.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:36 pm
JustWonders wrote:
Kerry will use any diversion available to him to keep voters from thinking of his miserable Senate record.


lets say that Kerry's Senate record, for the sake of discussion is miserable......when Kerry voted in the Senate he was representing Massachusetts....of course his approach to things will be different when he represents the entire country.....and Kerry's "miserable" track record as an ambassador to Massachusetts is so bad.....how much worse then bushs "miserable" track record as the head of the entire country?

And if Kerry uses a diversion and it's inexcusable then the same rules must apply to bush......who throws out more red herrings and smoke screens than can be counted....
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:39 pm
I disagree with your opinion JW. I don't think he was worried about how his Senate record would look when he complimented the Cheney's
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:43 pm
LOL pan...thanks
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:48 pm
Pan - you disagree with me on everything Smile

Edit to add: But...I appreciate the civilized way in which you do it Smile
0 Replies
 
princesspupule
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:49 pm
Lash wrote:
PrincessP--

Why do you say Lynne was in denial? The Cheney's have welcomed Mary's lover into the family...

She was just not wanting her daughter's sexuality to become political fodder. Wouldn't you protect your child's privacy?


Because in 2000, Cokie Roberts asked her about having a gay daughter and she repiled, "Mary has never declared such a thing."

I would protect my child's right to privacy, if they were keeping their life events private, and not speaking out to lesbian magazines about it. Clearly, Mary Cheney is ok about being gay and having the world know she is. What's wrong with talking about it, then? Only that some people aren't ok with it.

http://dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/08/01/mary/index.html
Quote:

By Dave Cullen and Daryl Lindsey
- - - - - - - - - -


August 01, 2000 | DENVER -- Lynne Cheney's discomfort with the media's interest in her lesbian daughter Mary, televised nationally over the weekend, threatens to ignite the first firestorm of the so-far superbly scripted Republican convention.

On Sunday, when ABC's Cokie Roberts started to ask the GOP vice presidential nominee's wife about having a daughter who has "declared she's openly gay," an irate Lynne Cheney shot back: "Mary has never declared such a thing." Cheney then blasted the media for its interest in the story, and chided Roberts: "I'm surprised, Cokie, that even you would want to bring it up on this program."


"I have two wonderful daughters. I love them very much. They are bright; they are hard-working; they are decent. And I simply am not going to talk about their personal lives," Cheney told Roberts.

Nationally, many gay leaders were alarmed by Lynne Cheney's remarks. The distaste implied by her use of the term "such a thing" to describe her daughter Mary's sexuality didn't come across as ringing acceptance. And some see it as an attempt to force Mary Cheney -- who has in fact publicly "declared" herself a lesbian, and has worked as the gay and lesbian corporate relations manager for Coors Brewing Co. -- back into the closet, at least on the campaign trail.

The controversy could bubble over this week, since friends of Mary Cheney say she's planning to bring her life partner, the woman she shares a house with in Conifer, Colo., to the Republican convention. She has reportedly postponed plans to attend business school this fall in order to campaign with her father, former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney.

Gay leaders wasted no time blasting Lynne Cheney's remarks to Roberts. "They were horrible," said Human Rights Campaign spokesman David Smith. "She said she is proud of both her daughters, but there was definitely a sense this was one aspect of who her daughter is that she was not proud of. That came through loud and clear."

"The fact that [Mary] is lesbian is not a private matter," he continued. "It was part of her job. She reached out to the gay and lesbian community for a major U.S. corporation. She was on the cutting edge of changing how a corporation reaches out to gay and lesbian customers."

Cheney herself told a lesbian magazine that she went to work for Coors "because I knew several other lesbians who were very happy here." Friends and colleagues say she has declared her sexuality in public on many occasions.


Denver colleagues laughed at the assertion that Mary has never "declared" her sexuality. "Of course she did," said Jim McNulty, co-founder of the organization that puts on the popular Aspen Gay Ski Week, which Coors has supported throughout Mary Cheney's tenure. "Did she tell me she was a lesbian? She said, 'This is my life partner.' That's exactly how she put it. They kissed and hugged, which is wonderful."

"It's been widely known for a long time that she's gay and not shy about it," says Elizabeth Birch, HRC executive director, interviewed Monday in Philadelphia where she attended a luncheon to honor gay Republicans. "I think she's between a rock and a hard place. The issue now will be whether she's locked in the vault -- literally or figuratively," Birch offered.

Friends of Cheney say they're "pretty sure" her girlfriend plans to join her at the Republican convention some time this week, and that Cheney wants the emotional support. "If I were in that vortex in Philadelphia, I'd want her to be there," said one close friend. "And I think if [the girlfriend] has it in her power to be there, she'll be there."

But he cautioned that the girlfriend's identity might remain hidden through the festivities. "There are ways of staying out of sight," he said, though he noted she "doesn't expect to remain private forever," he said. Salon and other news organizations know at least the first name of Cheney's girlfriend, and a photo of the pair is in circulation, but to date her identity has not been revealed in order to protect her privacy.

Some of Mary Cheney's friends agree with gay leaders' take that Lynne Cheney was attempting to shut down the sexuality story by shaming the press out of discussing "private" family matters. "She was trying to divide the world into those who get to ask personal questions about their family, and those who don't," a friend of Mary's said. "She looks like she thinks she has found a way to build an iron cage around the gay canary."

Friends say Mary Cheney came out to her parents at some point in her 20s, and that her father seemed to take it better than her mother. Father and daughter are known to travel together, enjoying hunting and fishing, but Mary Cheney is said to be less close to her mother.

0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:55 pm
"Declaring" such a thing publicly, and being gay are two completely different things. You don't get the distinction?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:57 pm
Think Rock Hudson. A community of people knew, but it wasn't declared in public. Each person may have their own reasons not to be on the public meat rack. Her right to privacy has been taken from her.
0 Replies
 
princesspupule
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 12:59 pm
Lash wrote:
"Declaring" such a thing publicly, and being gay are two completely different things. You don't get the distinction?


But Mary Cheney has declared it publically in lesbian magazines. What's wrong with bringing up something which has already been in print? Confused
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:05 pm
Lash wrote:
Mary Cheney has not gone on public record as being gay. It is a matter of her private life, which she has shared privately. [..]
McGreevey is out publicly. Ellen is out publicly. Rosie O'Donnell is out publicly.

Concerning your implication that Mary Cheney is not "out publicly", did you miss the bit about her being a board member of the Republican Unity Coalition, which as Soz noted seeks "to make homosexuality a 'non-issue' in the GOP and compares opposition to homosexuality to racism"? Or that she came to the (highly public) Republican Convention with her life partner?

You can make her many things, but not someone who is not out, not someone who would like to keep her orientation a strictly private thing - you dont go on Boards of gay organisations if you object to people publicly mentioning that you're gay.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:07 pm
So what you are saying Joe, is Kerry was just trying to reach out to the ignorant, bigoted vote, right?

So by that rationale, you freely admit there is a significant number of people who personally believe homosexuality is wrong… Which, in turn, means that no one has to be a bigot to reach out to this group, right? After all, their votes are as valuable as everyone else's and certainly, neither Joe Nation nor John Kerry is a bigot… so, does that mean we can be done with this false charge that in order to compare Mary's lesbianism to other things that are perceived as negatives, one must view lesbianism as a negative?

I think you've made an excellent point, Joe.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:20 pm
nah... the issue is about how SOME people decide UNILATERALLY what can be discussed and what cannot... and how they expect everyone else to acquiesce complacently... as if they were deferring to some "higher authority".

The Spinmeisters should all be placed on the biggest centrifuge NASA has, and given a dose of their own freakish medicine.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:34 pm
Kerry appears to be collapsing over at the IEM, where people invest their money in a bet on the elections' outcome ...

If the Mary Cheney remark turns out to be this race's "defining moment", your politics are in a more sorry state still than I'd thus far held imaginable.
0 Replies
 
princesspupule
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:38 pm
Ifinally found a recent article quoting Mary, herself! If she feels being gay should be a nonissue, what is all the hullabaloo?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4271472/

Quote:
Feb. 23, 2004 issue - In a campaign consumed with Vietnam War records and elusive weapons of mass destruction, the candidates have so far tiptoed around the season's touchiest wedge issue: gay marriage. Though advisers to George W. Bush hinted that the president would soon throw his support behind an amendment to the U.S. Constitution limiting marriage to the union of one man and one woman, he has yet to do so. And John Kerry hasn't been eager to detail his more nuanced stance against both gay marriage and any constitutional effort to ban it. The issue holds dangers for both sides. While Bush could rally his conservative base by backing an amendment, he doesn't want to alienate moderate voters by seeming mean-spirited. Kerry wants to stake out middle ground without seeming like another out-of-step Massachusetts liberal. Yet with grass-roots activists across the country ratcheting up the volume last week, the candidates may be dragged into the center of the latest cultural battle sooner than they'd like.

advertisement

Activists on both sides are launching guerrilla strikes. Conservatives have railed against same-sex marriage on talk radio and e-mail networks for months. Now they're lobbying in statehouses across the country. In San Francisco, hundreds of gay couples raced to impromptu weddings on the steps of city hall's ornate rotunda, where Mayor Gavin Newsom defiantly began issuing same-sex licenses in apparent violation of California law. "I don't accept that I'm breaking the law," Newsom told NEWSWEEK. "This is about not allowing discrimination." In Massachusetts last week, foes of gay marriage scrambled to pass a constitutional ban. They failed but will try again next month. And in the most audacious surprise attack yet, a new Web site targeted Mary Cheney, the openly lesbian daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney. Within an hour of its launch, DearMary.com attracted 100 emotional letters pleading with her to weigh in against a constitutional amendment. "Where is your courage, Mary?" asked one. "Your community needs you to voice your dissent."

As director of vice presidential operations for the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign, Mary Cheney makes an inviting target. In 2000 the Cheney family insisted that Mary was a private citizen and off-limits to the press. Even so, her presence seemed to bolster the "compassionate conservative" image the Bush-Cheney ticket hoped to portray. After her father became veep, Mary joined the gay-friendly Republican Unity Coalition and gave speeches encouraging the GOP to reach out to women, minorities and gays. "We can make sexual orientation a nonissue for the Republican Party, and we can help achieve equality for all gay and lesbian Americans,"
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:51 pm
nimh wrote:
Kerry appears to be collapsing over at the IEM, where people invest their money in a bet on the elections' outcome ...

If the Mary Cheney remark turns out to be this race's "defining moment", your politics are in a more sorry state still than I'd thus far held imaginable.


Nope. What it means is people are recognizing just how unfit to command ScaryKerry is. He has poor judgement, a callous disregard for the truth and speaks out of both sides of his mouth.

It means he's the wrong man, in the wrong race, at the wrong time.
0 Replies
 
princesspupule
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 01:55 pm
BTW, nimh & soz, Mary Cheney quit the RUC when she got hired onto her father's campaign. I'm assuming it was due to political pressure, but since she hasn't spoken publically since then on why she quit, or how she feels about being gay (that I have been able to find) we simply don't know. However, generally, shouldn't sexuality be a nonissue? It was tasteless to mention her by name, although not any more wrong than mentioning Bob Dole while talking about the situation of erectile disfunction would be, if one were discussing it in a debate. She is gay, still living with the same life partner she has introduced at republican functions, it should be a nonissue. What seems odd to me is that the republicans felt ok about trotting them out as a couple at functions, but it's this big stink for Kerry to mention her in context while making a point? Confused It's just to misdirect those who still have a problem with sexuality... I kind of feel like we're caught in a Seinfeld episode, and should qualify mentioning homosexuality with, "not that there's anything wrong with it." Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 02:01 pm
DRAMA.....
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 02:04 pm
Magus wrote:
nah... the issue is about how SOME people decide UNILATERALLY what can be discussed and what cannot... and how they expect everyone else to acquiesce complacently... as if they were deferring to some "higher authority".
That's a foolish statement. No one on this thread suggested any such thing. I'd get my knuckles bloody to defend your right to talk such trash, so I hope you weren't including me in your obviously partisan fantasy. Try reading the thread and you'll see that most of the people you might be insulting here agree that this kind of thing polices itself. Further, our arguments are should/shouldn't in relation to good taste, not can/cannot as your fantasy goes. Lastly, you suggestion that it's as if we're deferring to some "higher authority" I'll let you know that I, for one, believe in no such thing.

Sometimes, before opening up to insult others, it's a good idea to have at least a tiny clue what you're SHOUTING about. Idea
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 05:05:31