The continued reference to Mary Cheney by the Dems

dlowan wrote:

Please don't - let us not, for goddess' sake - have some kind of hyperbole bout between you and Blatham.

Now THAT one I'll happily second! ;-)

0 Replies

Of course OBill, if we accept your assessment of how presidents are elected in the USA, then we have to have the discussion about why Candidate A was more likeable than Candidate B.

0 Replies

sozobe wrote:

dlowan wrote:
Please don't - let us not, for goddess' sake - have some kind of hyperbole bout between you and Blatham.

Now THAT one I'll happily second! ;-)

And I'll happily third, for the sake of all humanity!

0 Replies

I'd win, by a squillion lightyears.

0 Replies

Charisma Foxy. Non-political charisma. I'm no lady so I wouldn't make the best judge, but couldn't you also make a case that the best looking candidate won every race too?

0 Replies

blatham wrote:

I'd win, by a squillion lightyears.

Of course you'd win in a hyper-anything contest. Way more experienced with:
Hyper-PC
Hyper-Partisan
Hyper-Gay (oops, that kind of humor is probably frowned upon on this thread)
Hyper- Razz

0 Replies

Hmmm - hyper is sooooooooooo in the eye of the beholder - at present, I'd say Bill wins on that one - but god defend me from ever seeing enough of either to be able to judge.

0 Replies

It just dawned on me that WWW doesn't stand for the U.S. Wide Web: It is safe for me to assume everyone recognized the young Senator from Illinois, isn't it?

0 Replies

Uh huh. Except maybe for Ted (hiccup) Kennedy...he confuses him with Osama Obama, Obama Osama, Obama bin...

Heh.

0 Replies

I was actually asking for the benefit of the foreigners because it still amazes me how in depth their knowledge of our system is.

0 Replies

Oh. Hehe...I sometimes think of Teddy as a furriner LOL.

0 Replies

Because he went to Harvard?

0 Replies

See, I usually think of him as a murderer.

0 Replies

I think of him as WC Fields.

0 Replies

Interesting commentary on Ted Kennedy today here:
http://realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/blog_2_7_05_1240.html

0 Replies

Isn't there a rightwing lynching thread you guys could use for this?

0 Replies

Your reading habits are showing, fox.

0 Replies

Maybe if you read something other than Salon or that kind of anti-American, anti-traditional-western-value, anti-conservative dedicated bias, you would have a broader point of view Blatham.

0 Replies

Broader point of view?

Laughing

You neocons wouldn't know a broader point of view even if your eyeballs were ripped out and that POV was shoved down your eye sockets.

If you want a broader point of view, perhaps the lame neoconservative insults could be put to rest first before attempting such a difficult task, Fox.

But then again, we all know what the rightwing point of view is, thanx to ol' Ann Coulter:

Quote:

"Right-wing pundit Ann Coulter referred to the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show performance featuring singers Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake as "simulated interracial sex," claimed that college professors make controversial statements to get "laid by coeds with hairy armpits who probably don't like men," and called the presence of "girls" in the military "appalling" -- all in one night of cable news appearances."

A rightwinger's heroine, Ann Coulter.

Is this what you mean by a "broader point of view," Fox?

0 Replies

I heard that remark by her last night. It made me laugh because she was basically in a free fall and by the time she was done with that line she had managed to say that professors get laid by girls who don't like men. That's a feat in and of itself. I don't know why anyone takes her remarks as seriously informed opinion.

0 Replies

The continued reference to Mary Cheney by the Dems

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know