0
   

The continued reference to Mary Cheney by the Dems

 
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 06:45 pm
<psst... Dookie... just toss some more sand on this thing!>
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 06:48 pm
I think at this point all the neocons can do is ramble.

And it is most sad indeed.

By the by:

http://www.zogby.com
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 06:54 pm
SAND!
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 06:55 pm
Sounds like someone is a real Mr. Crankypants tonight ... Razz
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 07:12 pm
That's funny JW!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 07:15 pm
Gonna be lots of grumpy pants - and pantesses - by the end of this thing.....


Somebody wanted sand???????


http://www.venhaus1.com/dunes4.jpg
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 07:15 pm
Actually, I'm rather ecstatic:

http://www.dailykos.com

http://www.democraticunderground.com

http://network.ap.org/dynamic/files/specials/election_night_2004/us_map_govsenhouse/index.html?SITE=CSPANELN&SECTION=POLITICS
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 07:25 pm
Don't jinx it, damn you Dookie!!!!

That is hubris.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 07:28 pm
Salt, sand, about the same, and salt has more de-jinxifying properties...

http://tubes.ominix.com/art/tiles/tile-rippled-sand.jpg
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 07:31 pm
Salt is de-jinxifying?????


http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/immpact/images/salt.jpg

http://whyfiles.org/111salt/images/salt_magn2.jpg

http://www.aas.duke.edu/study_abroad/andes/salt%20flats.jpg

http://209.238.151.128/salt.jpg
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Nov, 2004 08:11 pm
Art work in salt mines is the bomb!


http://www.geocities.com/jodyjimruble/images/Poland/saltrelief.jpg
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 10:02 am
If a writer for a Fox show authors an article for The New Republic, you know its gonna be different ...

Quote:
DAILY EXPRESS
Character Education

by Steve Hely

Only at TNR Online | Post date 01.28.05

Lazy pundits eager for easy editorials were pitched two softballs this week by the Bush cabinet. Reports emerged about the Pentagon's creation of newly formed spy units, giving Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld power to direct clandestine operations. And Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings denounced PBS for spending taxpayer money on a cartoon that included lesbian characters. But what commentators failed to realize was the obvious connection between the two controversies.

Even the most casual viewer of action movies knows that secret spy units are the backbone of America's defenses against threats both human and robot alike. Ideally such a unit should have a cool name. The Pentagon might do well to rename its "Strategic Support" group something like "FireForce Tigertooth" or "OpTeam: Slashrazor." And one further hopes that these teams are staffed with brash, unshaven mavericks, who take no guff from the desk jockeys back at HQ. Yet too much power concentrated in one department can present a threat to the government's balance. One can only imagine the kind of nightmarish scenarios that might arise from having a cocksure, arrogant Secretary of Defense. Which is why every other cabinet secretary should also get a secret spy unit--starting with Margaret Spellings.

Consider the course of recent events. Spellings somehow learned that an unaired episode of "Postcards from Buster" features the cartoon's title character visiting Vermont, where he encounters lesbian couples and learns about maple sugaring. The education secretary declared that "many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in the episode." Presumably she meant lesbianism, not maple sugaring.

Luckily, Spellings spoke out in time, and PBS does not intend to distribute the episode. But what if she hadn't? Lesbians have demonstrated their power to penetrate not only the world of maple sugaring, but the world of cartoons about maple sugaring as well. How much more of a wake-up call do we need?

A covert operations unit, reporting directly to the Secretary herself, would be an invaluable resource. Among other benefits, such a unit would free up valuable time Spellings apparently spends watching unaired episodes of "Postcards from Buster." But more importantly, it would provide a front-line strikeforce against incipient lesbianism.

Imagine this scenario: Two lesbians are meeting in secret, feeling confident and secure as they plot to infiltrate a children's cartoon. Suddenly, their scheming is interrupted by the piercing sound of a Blackhawk helicopter. It's "EdSquad: Thunderclap" (my suggested name), the elite force of the Department of Education. Another mission a success; another cartoon defended.

But foiling lesbians would be only one of the many tasks of a secret education intelligence unit. Relying on test scores to monitor school progress would be a thing of the past, as EdForce Mongoose (another of my name suggestions) could covertly determine just which children were being left behind. And by whom.

Detention and canceled recess are simply not effective deterrents to bullies anymore. Appeasement has failed. It's time to let EduStrike Hawksclaw (I've got tons of these) clamp down with stun grenades and Bradley fighting vehicles. Spitballs would be preemptively located and destroyed while still in the development stage.

For too long we've allowed the Department of Education to go unequipped, while lesbians and children only grow stronger. The sooner the Secretary of Education has human intelligence and first-strike capability, the better.

But our goals shouldn't be limited. Ultimately, all cabinet members should have their own ops teams. Think of a utopia without fear of poultry rebellion or cattle uprising--that's the America we could live in if Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns had the intelligence resources he so badly needs. Consider how much more effective Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez would be at protecting trademarks if his ComCommandos could negotiate with the business end of an AK-47. Flu vaccines wouldn't be so hard to find if the Department of Health and Human Services searched with Predator drones. Planning on stocking your factory with unsafe machinery? You'll think twice if you have Secretary Elaine Chao's LaborNinjas to worry about.

The problem with our intelligence has been too much organization, too much careful coordination. It's time to spread jurisdiction and control as widely as possible, to maximize success.

Secret spy groups and cartoon lesbians are all over the news. But it's time we realized the former is a solution to the latter. And it's time every administration official has what he needs to achieve the same kind of results Rumsfeld has gotten. It's time every cabinet secretary has a DropForce: Snowdragon. (They're free to use that.)


Steve Hely is a writer for the upcoming Fox show, "American Dad."
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 09:31 pm
JW! That Kerry amid a sea of "Mary Cheney is a lesbian" signs was priceless! It should go down in election lore. Thanks!
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 10:39 pm
LOL! I'd forgotten all about that one! That night was so exciting!!! Nail-biting time....kinda like now with the Iraqi election

Keeping my fingers crossed and doin' lots of praying Smile

<Just like last time LOL>
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 09:26 am
nimh

That's hilarious!
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 10:58 am
JustWonders wrote:
Keeping my fingers crossed and doin' lots of praying


To God? Or to Allah? Or to both?

It would seem to be prudent to cover all the bases (but you can probably exempt Buddha and those others)...

Got a rabbit's foot to rub? A four-leaf clover?
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 11:06 am
I'll add my thanks to nimh for resurfacing this old thread. Was fun to read back and see some of the "predictions" ... erroneous as they were Smile

"solid Kerry victory,"

"possible retaking of the Senate."

"Kerry will have a mandate"

<Laughs>
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 11:08 am
But don't forget, we're the delussioned ones JW. Smile
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 11:13 am
So, JW, Lash, Fox, what do you think of the Secretary of Education railing against a cartoon episode for including a lesbian couple?

Quote:
Spellings somehow learned that an unaired episode of "Postcards from Buster" features the cartoon's title character visiting Vermont, where he encounters lesbian couples and learns about maple sugaring. The education secretary declared that "many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in the episode."
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jan, 2005 11:35 am
nimh wrote:
So, JW, Lash, Fox, what do you think of the Secretary of Education railing against a cartoon episode for including a lesbian couple?

Quote:
Spellings somehow learned that an unaired episode of "Postcards from Buster" features the cartoon's title character visiting Vermont, where he encounters lesbian couples and learns about maple sugaring. The education secretary declared that "many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in the episode."


Nimh, it's my opinion that parents should have the option of deciding when and how to educate their children on these things. Believe it or not, children are not all the same and it just seems to me that a parent would be better able to judge when and how this information should be offered.

I think it's a rather simple solution that some would try to portray as very, very complicated, perhaps to justify their own agenda. I didn't see any "railing", but I'm sure if you portray it in that light, it must have been there.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 09:07:38