@snood,
I've already shown that the hundred agents who did the actual investigation into Clinton's illegal use of her email server were unanimous in their judgement that she should be prosecuted. I've shown that her activities, as defined by the U.S. Code, are illegal. I've shown that Comey's remarks concerning what Clinton did was that she was extremely careless, which means grossly negligent.
Mrs. Clinton was entrusted with national-defense information and knew that working with such classified intelligence was a substantial part of her duties as secretary of state. Despite this knowledge, she willfully, and against government rules, set up a private, non-secure e-mail communication system for all of her government-related correspondence — making it inevitable that classified matters would be discussed on the system. This was gross negligence at best. And the easily foreseeable result is that classified intelligence was removed from its secure government repository and transmitted to persons not entitled to have it — very likely including foreign intelligence services that almost certainly penetrated Mrs. Clinton’s non-secure system. The penalty for violating this penal statute is up to ten years’ imprisonment for each individual violation. Mind you, there are already 1,600 reported instances of classified information being transmitted via the Clinton server system, and the latest indications are that at least twelve, and as many as 30, private e-mail accounts are known to have trafficked in our nation’s defense secrets. Many of these account holders were certainly not cleared for access to the information — and none of them was permitted to access it in a non-secure setting.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/431254/hillary-clintons-e-mail-felony-violations-arent-stopping-her-running
Here's the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement she signed:
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HRC-classified-NDA1.pdf
Clinton received training in proper procedure concerning classified material, and she signed a Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement stating that she did indeed receive this training.
By signing this Agreement, Clinton also acknowledged that she understood that she was legally bound to the details of its content.
Clinton then ignored her legal obligations as stated in the Agreement she signed, and was grossly negligent.
Clinton was aware that the U.S. Code clearly condemns gross negligence, which describes gross negligence as exactly what she did.
Clinton violated the U.S. Code and the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement she signed.
______________________________________________________________________________
I have her actions, the U.S. Code that condemns her actions, and the classified information nondisclosure agreement she violated after signing.
So Comey came right out and said that she was grossly negligent. And then he basically says, "But I'm not going to do anything about it." As illogical as that is, it pales in comparison to unthinking people like yourself who, when faced with the facts of the issue, dishonestly appeal to your authority of choice (in this case, Comey) in order to maintain your faith that Clinton did not violate the U.S. Code and the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement she signed, acknowledging her legal obligation to follow protocol. You're easy, man.
And then you want to insult someone for looking at the facts and changing their mind about something.
Oh, and since when does someone being investigated for such a serious breach of trust get to decide which emails to turn over to the State Department, and which to not turn over? Doesn't raise any red flags for you? Really? Wouldn't it be great if when you get pulled over, and the cop smells the wrong kind of smoke, and then tells you to open your glove box, and you say to him, "Sure, but can you go back into your car while I first pull out the personal things that have nothing to do with what you smelled? Wouldn't that be great?
