30
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ? Part 2

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 05:07 pm
@Glennn,
Here's a case of a retired general charged with lying to the FBI.

Under the plea deal, the government and the defense agreed that sentencing guidelines call for between zero and six months in jail. However, prosecutors have the right to ask for a more serious sentence. The maximum possible sentence is five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/retired-general-charged-in-probe-of-classified-information-disclosure-229891#ixzz4OWCKodwp
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
Builder
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 05:51 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I would have thought that destroying evidence (wiping the server clean) might have been an offence, also.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 05:52 pm
@snood,
Quote:
I had a Secret clearance in the Army.


Let me guess, You handled as careless as Hitlery and that is why she is your hero?
Glennn
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:11 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
why bother to correct another Lash clone?

What a copout. Do your best to discredit the information I've put up. I've been doing this long enough to recognize hot air when it posts.

Forget what the FBI agent said. Address everything else I've posted. If you have anything to counter what I've shown, then let's see it. But we both know you're not about to try that. Right? Right.

Go ahead . . .
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:30 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
I would have thought that destroying evidence (wiping the server clean) might have been an offence, also.

It is. It's called obstruction of justice. Destruction of evidence.
Glennn
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:34 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Under the plea deal, the government and the defense agreed that sentencing guidelines call for between zero and six months in jail. However, prosecutors have the right to ask for a more serious sentence. The maximum possible sentence is five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Yeah, so at the very least, I would think that Clinton would have her security clearance pulled. Of course, that would mean she would be disqualified from becoming president.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:34 pm
@Glennn,
Quote:
I'm the kid who delivered the final push to her chest that put her on the floor


You are such a mean bully.
Glennn
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:42 pm
@reasoning logic,
Got no facts? Incapable of making a point? Can't formulate an argument? Not a problem if you're the poster called reasoning logic. Just go into the profile of the guy who's showing you to be a troll and pull out something from a story he wrote of an experience he had when he was eleven and post it, further showing everyone that you're not only a troll, but that you're actually too intelligence-challenged to not know that's what you look like.

You're hoping to pull me into a firefight. That's what intelligence-challenged posters do when they're frustrated.
georgeob1
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:44 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

I would have thought that destroying evidence (wiping the server clean) might have been an offence, also.


Yes, It's called destruction of evidence, and to make it worse, evidence that was at the time subject to Congressional subpoena. Without the knowing collusion of our remarkably politicized and corrupt Justice department Hillary would have been prosecuted long ago.

I must however concede that she and her supporters are masterful at denial, obscuring the issues, impugning the motives of her accusers and changing the subject. She has been aided in this by a supportive media establishment and the remarkably slavish credulity of her core supporters . However, it may well be that the accumulating public perception of persuasive corruption in the multifaceted and intertwining Clinton enterprises. together with the corruption of government agencies under the current administration , will be enough to bring about her long overdue political demise.

This is certainly an unusual political season that has, from the start, seen unpredicted surprises and turns of events; ranging from the unexpected surge of support from an otherwise unremarable socialist senator from Vermont; to the many turns 9of the Republican primary; the victory in it by Donald Trump and now the many ups and downs of the two candidates in the final competition.
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:45 pm
@Glennn,
81 emails found on Hillary's email server were found to be classified Confidential to Top Secret. That's damming evidence. She's been in government service long enough to know better.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Did you just discover this? Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:52 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Yup. And she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal record keeping laws, which is ridiculous! Clinton acknowledged in the Nondisclosure Agreement she signed that if she is unsure about anything concerning the handling of sensitive material, she is to ask someone who knows. She failed to do so. Even an idiot in her position would know that it is a given that conducting all of your government business on your own email server will ultimately result in classified material being mishandled.
Glennn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:53 pm
@georgeob1,
Well said!
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 06:58 pm
@Glennn,
Quote:
You're hoping to pull me into a firefight. That's what intelligence-challenged posters do when they're frustrated.


No not really just sharing my sense of humor with you that you were unable to see. I do not see you as a bully, I was just joking with you at the same time I was letting you know that I have paid attention to what you have shared. I liked what you shared, it seemed honest and also creative writing to me.

You were a bully at ten but you have not given any evidence that I can see where you are still the same way but you have given evidence of preconceived notions about me. Rolling Eyes 2 Cents Wink
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 07:04 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

Quote:
I had a Secret clearance in the Army.


Let me guess, You handled as careless as Hitlery and that is why she is your hero?

Your capacity for spouting nonsense is bottomless.
For the first couple of years in the Army I was a 29Y - Satellite Communications Repairer. The computer and commo tech was all considered cutting edge in its sophistication. - knowledge of it and of how to operate it was all classified. Back then a computer took up one whole wall in a very large room. The stuff I "handled" that was classified was all very specific to repairing 60 foot diameter(and larger) satellite dishes.

I don't need any heros. I am my own hero.
Hillary Clinton is a competent and effective public servant who has done a lot of good in her career and will do more as president. Especially with the influence of progressive bulldogs like Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders. She is already being saddled with the unremitting bullshit of those who don't want her to accomplish anything. But just like Obama did, I hope she sticks to her guns and gets things done in spite of all the stupid, retrograde haters.
georgeob1
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 07:11 pm
@Glennn,
I find it particularly remarkable that there has been so little comment about the blatently obvious motivation for Hillary's use of a private e mail server for all of her intertwined government, Clinton Foundation and political activities. That of course was to protect her from meeting the requirements of the Freedom of Information Law, which, given her involvement with so many long-term politicam operatives, some drawing salaries from both the State Department and the Foundation or its several captive consulting companies, all in various intertwined influence peddling, fund raising and pay-to-play operations that if discovered under a law designed to enhance political accountability and expose such corruption would have quickly exposed her operation for what it is.

Her explanation of course was that she wanted to put all her communications "on a single device" for her personal convenience. We now know that she used many such devices and that her operatives have destroyed at lesast a dozen of them (along with the hard drive on her private server) in a clearly illegal conspiracy to destroy evidence and public records.

It's difficult to consider such bald lies without recognizing the contempt she has for the public and, in particular for her own slavishly credulous supporters.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 07:12 pm
@snood,
Quote:
Back then a computer took up one whole wall in a very large room.


Wow you must have thought you were high tech with such a big computer.

Quote:
I don't need any heros. I am my own hero.


I do understand, I too hope to be a legend in my own mind in the future.

Quote:
Hillary Clinton is a competent and effective public servant who has done a lot of good in her career and will do more as president


More of what as president? Pay to play?
Builder
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 07:22 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
It's difficult to consider such bald lies without recognizing the contempt she has for the public....


Or the legal process.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 07:30 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

Quote:
Back then a computer took up one whole wall in a very large room.


Wow you must have thought you were high tech with such a big computer.

All computers were large back then. You're being an ass. Any particular reason you're being an ass, or just can't help yourself?

Quote:
I don't need any heros. I am my own hero.


I do understand, I too hope to be a legend in my own mind in the future.

Until then you can take solace in being a useless cipher in a politics forum.

reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2016 07:37 pm
@snood,
Quote:
Until then you can take solace in being a useless cipher in a politics forum.


I am not certain of what you expect from me but if there is any way possible for you to see me as someone who is the least among you it would satisfy me.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/29/2024 at 03:55:19