32
   

Will Donald Trump Be Afraid To Debate Hillary Clinton?

 
 
DrewDad
 
  5  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 10:25 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

Now that Chris Wallace has been named the moderator

If Hannity were moderator, you'd get the echo-chamber meme fest you're hungry for.

Wallace ain't no pushover; I suspect Trump will continue to be called on his BS, and will continue to screw the pooch.
ehBeth
 
  3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 10:29 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

Now that Chris Wallace has been named the moderator


that was announced early in September

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-debate-moderators-20160902-snap-story.html

Quote:
Wallace, who joined Fox News from ABC News in 2003, has a reputation for being tough on both sides of the political spectrum, which probably made him acceptable to commission co-Chairs Frank J. Fahrenkopf, a former head of the Republican National Committee, and Mike McCurry, who was press secretary in Bill Clinton’s White House.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:16 am
@DrewDad,
Quote:
If Hannity were moderator, you'd get the echo-chamber meme fest you're hungry for.

You mean like the last 2 debates that took place, big liberal echo-chamber.

Quote:
Wallace ain't no pushover; I suspect Trump will continue to be called on his BS, and will continue to screw the pooch.

I'm finally expected Hillary to be called on her BS. She is the one who the moderators have been kind to. She hasn't faced a tough question yet in the debates, and there is a good chance she won't know which questions are coming, no assist from liberal lapdogs.
ehBeth
 
  3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:18 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
She hasn't faced a tough question yet in the debates


I'd like to see both of the candidates faced with solid policy questions.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:29 am
Donald Trump Jr: Women Who Can’t ‘Handle’ Harassment ‘Don’t Belong In The Workforce’
Source: Huffington Post

Donald Trump Jr. offered some unsolicited career advice for women concerned about sexual harassment in the workplace: Just quit, already.

“If you can’t handle some of the basic stuff that’s become a problem in the workforce today, then you don’t belong in the workforce,” Donald Trump’s son told The Opie and Anthony Show in a 2013 interview that BuzzFeed just unearthed.

“You should go maybe teach kindergarten,” he said, apparently suggesting that teachers aren’t part of the workforce. “You can’t be negotiating billion-dollar deals if you can’t handle, like, you know.”

Gender-based harassment, both sexual and not, is against the law in the U.S. “It is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general,” according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Read more: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5800b9bbe4b0162c043b532e
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:35 am
@ehBeth,
I would too chances are they won't but more rumor mongering for both sides. For Clinton it will more than likely be those hacked emails, plus the ever persistent email server thing and any other hot topic and for Trump it will be latest rumors of his groping and sexual harassments and his video and all his many statements. If policies get brought up it will almost be an after thought and what they can get in edgewise. If it is about policies and plans, Hillary Clinton will stomp Donald Trump. The only way he gets around her knowing what she is talking about verses him knowing nothing is to say stupidly but effectively "she has been there for thirty years..."
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:42 am
@revelette2,
Wikileaks has been dropping stories on Hillary for the last few weeks, and there has hardly been mention of them in the news.
revelette2
 
  2  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:45 am
Speaking of latest groping:

Woman says Trump reached under her skirt and groped her in early 1990s

Quote:
Kristin Anderson was deep in conversation with acquaintances at a crowded Manhattan nightspot and did not notice the figure to her right on a red velvet couch — until, she recalls, his fingers slid under her miniskirt, moved up her inner thigh, and touched her vagina through her underwear.

Anderson shoved the hand away, fled the couch and turned to take her first good look at the man who had touched her, she said.

She recognized him as Donald Trump: “He was so distinctive looking — with the hair and the eyebrows. I mean, nobody else has those eyebrows.”

At the time of the incident, which Anderson said took place in the early 1990s, she was in her early twenties, trying to make it as a model. She was paying the bills by working as a makeup artist and restaurant hostess.

Trump was a big celebrity whose face was all over the tabloids and a regular presence on the New York club scene.

The episode, as Anderson described it, lasted no more than 30 seconds.

Anderson said she and her companions were “very grossed out and weirded out” and thought, “Okay, Donald is gross. We all know he’s gross. Let’s just move on.”

Over the years, Anderson, now 46 and a photographer living in Southern California, has recounted the story to people she knew, casually at first.
One friend, Kelly Stedman, told The Washington Post that Anderson informed her about the encounter a few days after it happened.

“We were out at a girls’ brunch” at the Great Jones Cafe in Manhattan, Stedman said, recalling that when she and two other friends heard the story, they found themselves “laughing at how pathetic it was” on Trump’s part.

Anderson said she lived in New York City from 1991 until 2008. Brad Trent, a New York photographer, said he heard the story about Trump from Anderson at a dinner with a group of people in March 2007.

“It was just girls saying stories about how they got hit on by creepy old guys,” Trent said of the conversation around the table. “That’s when I found out about it.”

Anderson is one of a number of women who have come forward in recent days and said that Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, made unwanted sexual advances.

As Trump has done with others who have made accusations, his campaign said that Anderson is making the whole thing up.

“Mr. Trump strongly denies this phony allegation by someone looking to get some free publicity. It is totally ridiculous,” Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks said in an emailed statement.

Anderson, who said she doesn’t support Trump or Democrat Hillary Clinton, did not initially approach The Post. A reporter contacted her after hearing her story from a person who knew of it, and she spent several days trying to decide whether to go public.

Anderson’s decision to do so follows last week’s disclosure by The Washington Post of a 2005 video in which Trump boasted to “Access Hollywood” host Billy Bush that his celebrity gave him the ability to grab women “by the p---y. You can do anything.”
Trump insisted that his comments were “just words” and dismissed them as “locker room banter.”

Pressed about them in Sunday night’s debate against Clinton, Trump said that he had never done the things he had talked about, which would constitute sexual assault.

What Anderson described, however, is consistent with the behavior Trump described on the video.

“It wasn’t a sexual come-on. I don’t know why he did it. It was like just to prove that he could do it, and nothing would happen,” Anderson said. “There was zero conversation. We didn’t even really look at each other. It was very random, very nonchalant on his part.”

Anderson said that she was particularly disturbed by the way the video caught Trump and Bush, who were aboard a bus, crudely discussing Arianne Zucker, an actress they spotted waiting to escort them onto a soap-opera set. Bush has since been suspended from his subsequent job as co-host of NBC’s “Today” show, and the network is reportedly negotiating his departure.

“I watched this woman — who could have been me; it could have been anyone — walk in and shake his hand,” Anderson said. “That was just nauseating, because she has no idea what she was walking into, and what could possibly happen to her. And that’s just wrong.”

As Anderson agonized over whether to tell her story publicly, the New York Times reported the accounts of two women who said that Trump had groped them, and a People magazine reporter wrote a first-person story claiming that in December 2005 Trump pushed her against a wall and began “forcing his tongue down my throat.”

That decided it for Anderson.

“It’s a sexual assault issue, and it’s something that I’ve kept quiet on my own,” Anderson said. “And I’ve always kept quiet. And why should I keep quiet? Actually, all of the women should speak up, and if you’re touched inappropriately, tell somebody and speak up about it. Actually go to the authorities and press some charges. It’s not okay.”


(more at the source) (I may have the paragraphs wrong spaced, it lumps it all together and I go back and space them out...)
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:47 am
@Baldimo,
Because there is nothing to them, doesn't make them very newsworthy.
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:52 am
@revelette2,
Of course to a Hillary supporter and her fans in the media, there is nothing to them, they are part of the story, with collusion between the networks and the Hillary campaign. Nothing to see here folks, move along...
oralloy
 
  -2  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 11:56 am
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:
Because there is nothing to them, doesn't make them very newsworthy.

There are many good reasons to vote for Republicans.

One of those good reasons is the facts that Democrats think it is perfectly OK for other Democrats to engage in wrongdoing.

If you want ethics in your leaders, gotta look to the Republicans.
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:10 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
One of those good reasons is the facts that Democrats think it is perfectly OK for other Democrats to engage in wrongdoing.


Prove this claim.

Republicans in many states have worked to suppress voting. That's as un-American as it can be in this country.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/opinion/martin-black-vote/index.html
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
An opinion piece?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:13 pm
@Baldimo,
That's right, tRump personally, his campaign spokesmen generally, the RW blogs, Glen Beck, Limpbaugh, InFoWars, Free Republic, Breitbach are all screaming that meaningless anti-Hillary poop that the public just doesn't give jack-all about and there's a liberal/Clinton/DNC/GOP/RNC conspiracy, right?

When the much more obvious conclusion is a RW cabal of aluminum hatted knuckle draggers out ginning controversy out whole-clothe regarding Hillary in some sort of way of excusing or deflecting attention from tRump's dangerous and well documented ethical and moral shortcomings.
snood
 
  7  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:13 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

Of course to a Hillary supporter and her fans in the media, there is nothing to them, they are part of the story, with collusion between the networks and the Hillary campaign. Nothing to see here folks, move along...

No, there's nothing to them. Trump's casting call surrogates are making as much of it as they can - there's just not much red meat there to work with. I know that's disappointing for you Baldy. If there's something so blockbuster there that decent people really, really should be concerned about - why don't you tell us what those things are? (spoiler for anyone who can't wait for Baldy's witty rejoinder - there's nothing in the wikileaks story so far that's much worth mentioning)
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  7  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:14 pm
@Baldimo,
"The media" (as if there is such a monolithic group) is out for the scoop. Publishing something that has already been hashed over doesn't get someone the corner office. If the Clinton emails had something juicy in them, we would be hearing about it, but the reality is that the emails are more embarrassing than indicting. They are also all public now, so there is nothing stopping Republicans from going through them and publishing them. You don't have to wait for the NY Times. Hannity and Limbaugh are spending all their time complaining about media complicity because their folks can't find any good emails to talk about.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:16 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
This needs repeating,
Quote:
....deflecting attention from tRump's dangerous and well documented ethical and moral shortcomings.


It amazes me to see how Trump continues to receive support after all that have been revealed about his unethical, illegal, talking and touching of women.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/trump-supporters-big-tent-217481

Really.

Also what engineer said above my post.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -3  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:18 pm
@Real Music,
Real Music wrote:
Will Donald Trump Be Afraid To Debate Hillary Clinton?


Well he hasn't ducked out of the first 2 debates so far..Smile
In fact he's got Hillary squirming so much that she's trying distraction tactics by referencing his locker room banter.
The REAL issues are ones like the 2000 US servicemen Obama and Hillary have got killed in the pointless Afghanistan blunder-

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Afgh-deaths_zpsyu3ftqxd.jpg~original
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -2  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:23 pm
Then there's the little matter of the "unholy Trinity" of Obama, Kerry and Hillary bringing WW3 Armageddon a step closer-

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/hillary-nukes_zpsdtwgktlo.jpg~original
----------------------------------------------------
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/israel-25-years499_zpseibrvzph.jpg~original
----------------------------------------------------
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Trump-iran4_zpsudtvux6i.jpg~original
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  6  
Fri 14 Oct, 2016 12:39 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
She hasn't faced a tough question yet in the debates,

Can you define a tough question you'd like to see her asked?

Personally, I thought asking her to say something nice about Donald Trump was pretty cruel.... Wink
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.73 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 06:20:16