Will Donald Trump Be Afraid To Debate Hillary Clinton?

Without the business people hiring people to make them money then those people are doing nothing. They are not creating anything, building anything, innovating anything, growing anything, paying anything. They are nothing without the person that has hired them to trade money for labor.

No one is against entrepreneurship. That's actually a good thing. The problem is excessive greed of the super wealthy who are not paying their fair share in taxes. If the super wealthy were to pay their fair share in taxes, that would benefit the community as a whole.

Um.... no. Are you really this dumb, to believe that your entire self worth is based on getting a paycheck from someone?

Are you really that dumb, to believe that Americans are incapable of being their own bosses?

Fine. Vote for new politicians who share that point of view who will change the tax law. Clinton will not do any of that regardless of what she says

It's not only about taxes that the majority republican congress must be replaced. Their gridlock without compromise (by both parties) must be stopped.

REP. JERROLD NADLER (D-NY): Let me talk about a case that may pose a current national security threat to the United States and ask you a few questions about that. In his earlier remarks, Mr. [John] Conyers [D-MI] referenced an August 30 letter from the ranking members of a number of House committees. That letter asked whether the FBI was investigating troubling connections between Trump campaign officials and Russian interests and whether they contributed to the illegal hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic National Campaign Committee. You’re familiar with that letter, I take it?

JAMES COMEY (FBI DIRECTOR): Yes, I’m familiar with the letter.

NADLER: I’d like to ask you a few questions. The letter said this and I quote. “On August 8, 2016, Roger Stone, a Donald Trump confidant, revealed that he has communicated with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about the upcoming release of additional illegally hacked Democratic documents. Mr. Stone made these statements during a Republican campaign event while answering a question about a potential ‘October surprise.’”

Obviously if someone is stating publicly that he is in direct communication with the organization that obtained these illegally hacked documents, I assume the FBI would want to talk to that person. Has the FBI interviewed Roger Stone about his communications with Julian Assange or his knowledge of how WikiLeaks got these illegally obtained documents?

COMEY: I can’t comment on that.

NADLER: Mr. Stone stated that he has knowledge about upcoming leaks of additional illegally hacked documents. Has the FBI asked him about those communications?

COMEY: I also can’t comment on that.

NADLER: Because it’s an ongoing investigation?

COMEY: I don’t want to confirm whether there is or is not an investigation

Who would be foolish enough to work for someone else when they could work for themselves?

I think the people capable of working for themselves, do. Everyone else works for those people. You can't really believe that everyone is capable of running a successful business do you? Most people can barely work for someone else without bitching about it.

There's not a magic quality that makes someone an entrepreneur. Tons of wannabe entrepreneurs fail. Tons of incredibly successful people draw a paycheck.