0
   

Bush AWOL documents fake?

 
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 08:52 am
OutFoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism
Outfoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com

Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism uses the inflammatory tactics of the Fox News Channel to demonstrate the conservative bias that's handed down by Fox's owner, media mogul Rupert Murdoch. The documentary gathers interviews from media watchdogs and former Fox employees (including a former anchor, Jon Du Pre, who describes his flailing efforts to create a celebration for Reagan's birthday when the one he was sent to cover never materialized), but their overwhelming condemnation of Fox's skewed news practices isn't half as effective as footage taken directly from Fox itself--an appalling montage of pundit Bill O'Reilly telling guests to shut up; repeated efforts to paint Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry as weak and waffling, while President Bush is captured in respectful, reverent images; and management memos dictating language, subject matter, and point of view. Outfoxed is unlikely to persuade Fox News fans to change their views, but it may spur outraged liberals to take action. --Bret Fetzer

About the Director
Outfoxed Director/Producer Robert Greenwald has produced and/or directed 53 television movies, miniseries and features. He is the director of Uncovered and the Executive Producer of the UN series - Unprecedented, Uncovered and the soon to be released Unconstitutional.

Description
"Fair and balanced"??? How about anything BUT?!?! For the first time ever, this documentary reveals the secrets of Former Fox news producers, reporters, bookers and writers who expose what it's like to work for Fox News. These former Fox employees talk about how they were forced to push a "right-wing" point of view or risk their jobs. Some have even chosen to remain anonymous in order to protect their current livelihoods. As one employee said "There's no sense of integrity as far as having a line that can't be crossed."
"Outfoxed" examines how media empires, led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know.

"Outfoxed" first examines media mogul Rupert Murdoch and the Australian company, News Corp., tracing how the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) helped Murdoch break the rules to establish a fourth network in the United States. The film explores Murdoch's burgeoning kingdom and the impact on society when a broad swath of media is controlled by one person.

Media experts, including Walter Cronkite, Jeff Cohen (FAIR), Bob McChesney and Chellie Pingree, provide context and guidance for the story of Fox News and its effect on society.

The team behind "Outfoxed" created a system to monitor Fox News 24 hours a day for months to discover exactly how its shows worked. A team of volunteers around the country scrutinized every hour of Fox News programming, noting examples of bias in its coverage. The result is an intense examination of Fox News and the lie inherent in its favorite motto: "Fair and Balanced."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The content of OUTFOXED may not come as a surprise to many long-time political activists, but this DVD will absolutely floor many people who tend to take their news for granted. In short, OUTFOXED takes on FOX News the same way Michael Moore's FAHRENHEIT 9/11 takes on the Iraq invasion - and produces some hard-hitting results.

Testimonials and eyewitness accounts from former and current FOX News reporters and employees (some deliberately kept anonymous) help build the case against the channel's perceived right-wing bias and editorial censorship from the top brass at FOX, including owner Rupert Murdoch. Excerpts from FOX memos are also exhibited, but would have packed more of a punch if shown as originally distributed instead. The most damning evidence, however, seems to come from FOX News broadcasts themselves, which are presented in substantial quantity in this documentary.

Although it can be argued that OUTFOXED has its own bias and agenda, the arguments it presents are extremely hard to dismiss. Highly recommended, especially for journalism students.
-----------------------------------------------
Exposes Fox Tactics, July 22, 2004
Reviewer: A. E Rothert (Edwardsville, IL)

This documentary is mostly strong. Using volunteers who monitored Fox "News" 24 hours a day for months, the film makers are able to discern and highlight several tactics Fox uses to portrary right-wing opinion as news. Although the film demonstrates conclusively that Bill O'Reilly is over-the-top and frequently plays loose with the truth, I doubt anyone will be surprised by the revelation. More disturbing are the more subtle ways in which Fox indoctrinates its viewers into believing things that are not true. For instance, the film exposes the frequent use of "People say..." as the introduction to assertions that don't meet anyone's criteria for news. The numerous former Fox employees who are willing to speak out are impressive, as are the comments from Walter Cronkite. In the end, Outfoxed overwhelmingly proves its thesis : Fox News is grossly misrepresenting itself to America when it claims to be fair and balanced. Fox, in reality, is neither. Nor is it news. BUT people watch Fox News to reconfirm what they want to believe. Fox could drop its misleading self-description and still have plenty of viewers; thus, this documentary is more about confronting Fox News' spin in an attempt at making the corporation responsible than about helping its willingly duped viewers. Nevertheless, it is a worthy goal. Finally, as much as I enjoyed the revealations about Fox News, the film does not merit five stars. The production values are mediocre; some hands are overplayed.
------------------------------------------

Reviewer: D. Maisano "Smart Person" (Waltham,MA)

This film shows beyond a shadow of a doubt the corruption in the news media and how it is effecting our country. Ironically, I first heard about this movie ON the Fox News Channel! Of course they were trying to smear it, like all conservatives act, rather than giving an opposing viewpoint with evidence, but all it did for me was whet my appetite to see this film. Although this is somewhat preaching to the choir, it always helps to give people evidence of just how corrupt our country has become, and why we need a change in power. The sad thing is that most of hte people below the Bible belt rely on the Fox News Channel for info, and its just playing into the hands of the Bush administration. This is a sign that we need to change things. Good job.
-------------------------------------------

Good journalism promotes greater awareness., September 15, 2004
Reviewer: A. Pendola

There is no doubt that this film does some great in-depth journalism and reporting. The research is mostly well thought out and the points are quite valid in many respects. The whole notion of "uncovering" the bias in FOX News seems thin if not pretentious to me though. This film doesn't really "uncover" anything radically new. I was under the assumption that just about everybody knew that FOX is conservative and CNN liberal. Listen to the headlines these two stations churn out each day and note the differences. FOX is a blatantly conservative station, and if you choose to watch it, then you should be aware of that. If you watch it and do not realize that it is conservative, then you are obviously not listening or thinking. CNN is much the same, but their liberal views are more subtle, and usually, presented in a more tasteful manner. Please don't believe that FOX is the only station that has strong partisan views. ABC, CBS, NBC. All these stations have bias, and if you watch for it, it is obvious. Nearly every station will change the facts to make news either more interesting or to promote individual preferences. Really, I wish everyone would watch the news on PBS, as it is the most unbiased news I have ever seen, and it doesn't try to dazzle people with fast moving journalism and potent, emotional headlines. It is just good news, with very little partisanship.

Sorry to get so off topic. Just my own 2 cents. But in watching this film, it does make one more aware of how news in general acts to endorse partisan views, and how the media can make or break a story depending on their beliefs. This is a good film to promote an overall awareness of what kind of news you are watching. Make sure you think when you watch the news, and always be skeptic of what both sides are saying, whether you agree with them or not. Frankly, I am glad that FOX News exists, because it creates a balance with other stations. There are always two sides to every story. Please remember, it is up to you to make your own decisions, not the media.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 08:53 am
timberlandko wrote:
I am suggesting nothing, I assert the Yellowcake Documents complaint is both diversionary and unfounded. I further submit that in perpetuating that particular meme, The Opposition clearly evidences a preference for rote partisanship as opposed to objective, analytically thought-out proactive discourse.


I'm not sure if Timber is just being facetious here...but on the off shoot chance that he is not...

...pot, be quiet. We know the kettle is black!





I
0 Replies
 
left angle
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 09:48 am
testing 123
testing 123
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 10:03 am
Re: testing 123
left angle wrote:
testing 123


Hey, that looks like a proportionally spaced font!
0 Replies
 
padmasambava
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 02:14 pm
So what's the proportion 17:21?

I could do this. . .

Is it a copy of an original that may have been printed proportionally? Is it an uncertain certainty that the document is a fake? Or is it a certain uncertainty?

Please clarify.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 02:21 pm
flyboy804 wrote:
DontTreadonMe as evidence of Fox's conservative bias (a fact with which I don't disagree) used quotes from Niel Gabler and the "woman panelist". He failed to mention that these two are the liberal members of Fox's weekly program "Newswatch". I am not surprised that the two conservative panelists on the program were not quoted.


did i not say that i was going to make the clip available? then what would be the point of my quoting the whole thing?

so what's your point? just wanna say "look! the liberal didn't quote the conservatives! liberal bias! liberal bias!"

cool your jets until i find a way to post it. they don't make it easy to do here.
Cool
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 02:24 pm
Re: OutFoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Outfoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism


done on a shoe string. not a lot of new info here if you are already a close scrutinizer of fox.

not a great effort, but it's great that he made the effort.

imho.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 02:37 pm
Meanwhile, back to the original topic ... here's an update. The reclusive Colonel Staudt has come forth. If the CBS coffin needed another nail, Staudt supplied it and drove it home.

Quote:
Speaking Out
Air National Guard Colonel Denies Bush Got Preferential Treatment
ABCNEWS.com

Sept. 17, 2004?- The man cited in media reports as having allegedly pressured others in the Texas Air National Guard to help George W. Bush is speaking out, telling ABC News in an exclusive interview that he never sought special treatment for Bush.


Retired Col. Walter Staudt, who was brigadier general of Bush's unit in Texas, interviewed Bush for the Guard position and retired in March 1972. He was mentioned in one of the memos allegedly written by Lt. Col. Jerry Killian as having pressured Killian to assist Bush, though Bush supposedly was not meeting Guard standards.
"I never pressured anybody about George Bush because I had no reason to," Staudt told ABC News in his first interview since the documents were made public.

The memo stated that "Staudt is pushing to sugar coat" a review of Bush's performance.

Staudt said he decided to come forward because he saw erroneous reports on television. CBS News first reported on the memos, which have come under scrutiny by document experts who question whether they are authentic. Killian, the purported author of the documents, died in 1984.

Staudt insisted Bush did not use connections to avoid being sent to Vietnam.

"He didn't use political influence to get into the Air National Guard," Staudt said, adding, "I don't know how they would know that, because I was the one who did it and I was the one who was there and I didn't talk to any of them."

?'Highly Qualified'

During his time in charge of the unit, Staudt decided whether to accept those who applied for pilot training. He recalled Bush as a standout candidate.

"He was highly qualified," he said. "He passed all the scrutiny and tests he was given."

Staudt said he never tried to influence Killian or other Guardsmen, and added that he never came under any pressure himself to accept Bush. "No one called me about taking George Bush into the Air National Guard," he said. "It was my decision. I swore him in. I never heard anything from anybody."

When he interviewed for the job, Bush was eager to join the pilot program, which Staudt said often was a hard sell. "I asked him, 'Why do you want to be a fighter pilot?' " Staudt recalled. "He said, 'Because my daddy was one.' He was a well-educated, bright-eyed young man, just the kind of guy we were looking for."

He added that Bush more than met the requirements for pilot training. "He presented himself well. I'd say he was in the upper 10 percent or 5 percent or whatever we ever talked to about going to pilot training. We were pretty particular because when he came back [from training], we had to fly with him."

Bush has repeatedly said he completed all of his Guard commitments. Critics of the president say he got special treatment because his father was a congressman and U.N. ambassador. There also have been questions about why the young Bush skipped a required medical exam in 1972 and apparently failed to show up for Guard activities for six months.

Records show Bush stopped flying F-102As in April 1972. He has said he moved to Alabama to work on the Senate campaign of a family friend. Staudt retired from the Guard in March of that year and said he was never contacted about Bush's performance.

"There was no contact between me and George Bush … he certainly never asked for help," Staudt said. "He didn't need any help as far as I knew."

He added that after retiring he was not involved in Air National Guard affairs. "I didn't check in with anybody ?- I had no reason to," he said. "I was busy with my civilian endeavors, and they were busy with their military options. I had no reason to talk to them, and I didn't."

Staudt said he continues to support Bush now that he is president. "My politics now are that I'm an American, and that's about all I can tell you," he said. "And I'm going to vote for George Bush."

ABC News' Ariane DeVogue contributed to this report.


There are two ends of a horse. The foregoing came from the horse's mouth.

The Texas Attorney General's office is rumored to "be interested" in "certain aspects of and persons involved with" the clumsy caper. A number of the principals in the fraud have begun "refering requests for comment to counsel".
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 02:43 pm
Seeing as how Staudt was the one who was on Bush's d***, this doesn't really shed any light on things.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 03:59 pm
Quote:
Outfoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism


I would strongly suggest that anybody and everybody either watch or buy (as I did) the movie "Outfoxed." It really is a frightening and factual portrait of a news industry gone terribly astray, where entire news organizations (FOX being the exception) literally utilize the art of Goebbels propoganda, pushing a lop-sided propogandist message of ever so subtle (to some) fascist tendencies down the throats of a ever-growing ignorant society.

My many thanks to BumbleBeeBoogie for bringing that up. It is extremely appropriate when dealing with an American populace which is getting hardlined into a neo-fascist, conservative society. And yet there is a crack in the armor of the Republican party, as the realities of the Iraq war, and what Kerry was saying the other day, are much worse than what the Bush administration is telling us.

If a neoconservative can explain to ME why the news of Iraq that the press is reporting compared to what Bush is saying about Iraq sound so paradoxically different, then I'll eat my shoe.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 04:05 pm
Bush doesn't deny the facts of death and struggle in Iraq. So, he agrees with the reporting.

He just also tells the positive side. The news doesn't.

They tell part of the picture. He acknowledges their part, and adds the part they're not telling.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 04:14 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
If a neoconservative can explain to ME why the news of Iraq that the press is reporting compared to what Bush is saying about Iraq sound so paradoxically different, then I'll eat my shoe.


I'm not really a neo-conservative regardless of the accusations, but let me give this a shot.

Bush is a politician, a pretty good one actually. Despite what the left want you to believe about him being a moron, he is a damned good politician. He works to do what he believes is best for the country and he has a cabinet of advisors that should be experts in their particular niche.

It would be political suicide for Bush to get in front of the camera and say that he fucked up and that we should never have invaded Iraq. We have now demonstrated that our bite may not be as bad as we barked about. Bush knows, because he is a good politicain that his opponents will demonstrate as much negativity as possible, he doesn't need to. Instead, Bush advertises the good thing happeneing and attempts to further the good fight because their is always the possibility that his plans may bear fruit.

The press has a liberal slant to it. Not an uncommon occurrence during a time of war. No one wants to send their sons and daughters of to a war so the press, an organization built for profit, knows that bad news moves product. Who cares if Iraq has new schools, untreatened sports teams, freedom to learn, freedom to travel, people only want to know how many people dies and what our administration is doing to curb it.

So, there ya go. I hope you have small feet.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 04:16 pm
Dookie, I happen have both freinds and relatives who are or have been active military in the Iraq Theater of Operations (and in Afghanistan as well), as well as throughout the military of The US and several other nations. With many of them, I am in daily contact via the web, with others, its phone calls and letters. To an individual, all are apalled, puzzled, dismayed, and angered by the negatively biased media coverage of the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't expect you'll dine on shoe based on my anecdotal references, but I happen, from my correspondents who are or have been "on scene", to get a very different picture than that forcefed into the living rooms and onto the periodicals of an otherwise uninformed public. You believe whomever you wish. I trust folks I know and respect. I'm not so accepting of The Mainstream Media. How do I know somebody like ... oh, say Dan Rather ... isn't trying to press an agenda through unscrupulous means?
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 04:43 pm
Um, then why is it that when Bush says that 75% of the Al Qaeda leadership has either been captured or killed, he doesn't tell you that most of them have been replaced already? It would seem the "other" side of the argument that Bush is telling us in this regard is rather moot.

It is also a forgone conclusion that elections in Iraq will not happen as scheduled, that the insurgency is getting much more emboldened and sophisticated, and that many additional troops are now needed in Afghanistan, as the Taliban, and other arab factions, are regaining ground lost in the region.

And that would be a direct result of resources being solely dedicated to Iraq, whereas Al Qaeda was firmly operating out of Afghanistan, and therefore justified our reasons for bombing them out of the region and hopefully into oblivion to begin with.

Quite frankly, I'm just interested in the truth. Are the Bush NG documents forgeries? Seems so. But I want to know the TRUTH, whether it be from CBS, the RNC, the DNC, and whoever else may know.

What is intrinsically wrong with Bush telling the American people the truth, when he never does to begin with?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 05:33 pm
I imagine there was some jaw clenching and tooth-grinding at AP and CBS over this. Particularly galling must have been the documentation of Guard training completed in the previously questioned May-June '73 timeframe, and the explicit reference to Lt Bush's failure to be a druggie. To their credit, they ran with it, though still managing to avoid actually acknowledging the intentional fraud to which they were party. I note with some amusement the AP/CBS storyline still is that Bush was "Not permitted to fly" after having "failed to take" a flight medical, despite the obvious and oft-stated fact no flight medical would be required for someone who was not going to be at an installation equipped with aircraft for which he was trained and qualified, and therefore would not be flying.

A big problem CBS came up against was that not all of their "sources" and "corroborating witnesses" were either dead or Democrats. That's what bit them ... real live people with real memories, memories contraindicative of the veracity of the allegations, allegations which stand now discreditted along with those who maliciously, consciously, and fraudulently pressed them.


Quote:
Texas Cmdr. Praised Bush To Pop
NEW YORK, Sept. 17, 2004

(CBS/AP) A packet of Texas Air National Guard records released Friday showed that the commanding officer of President Bush's basic training unit took a special interest in him as a trainee and wrote to his father to praise his son.

Bush's father, then a congressman from Texas, said in reply to the commander, "That a major general in the Air Force would take interest in a brand new Air Force trainee made a big impression on me."

Bush went on to say that his son "will be a gung ho member" of the Air Force and that Air Force instructors had "helped awaken the very best instincts in my son."

The letter and other material were the latest in a stream of documents released about Bush's service three decades ago during the Vietnam War, when Bush's critics say he got preferential treatment as the son of a congressman and U.N. ambassador. Critics have also questioned why Bush skipped a required medical examination in 1972 and failed to show up for drills during a six-month period that year.

The White House has said repeatedly that all of Bush's Guard records have been disclosed, only to be embarrassed when new documents have turned up. The long-running story took an unusual turn when CBS uncovered documents purportedly showing that Bush refused orders to take a physical examination in 1972 ?- but then the authenticity of the documents came under doubt.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CBS issued this statement Friday:
"CBS News is determined to answer the questions that have emerged about documents in a report originally broadcast on 60 MINUTES Wednesday. We will continue to aggressively report on those documents and all aspects of the story until the matter is resolved and, when it is, broadcast our findings as soon as possible. The network has provided two e-mail address for viewer feed back, one for general audience viewers and another for 60 Minutes viewers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In addition to the letter from Bush's father, the latest documents contain news releases that the Texas Air National Guard sent to Houston newspapers in 1970 about young Bush, then a second lieutenant and new pilot. "George Bush is one member of the younger generation who doesn't get his kicks from pot or hashish or speed," the news release said. "Oh, he gets high, all right, but not from narcotics."

Three decades later, a new book by Kitty Kelley has alleged that Bush used cocaine while he was a student at Yale University and later at Camp David while his father was president.

The White House has denounced Kelley's book, "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty," and denied the charges.

The new packet of documents also contained two single-page orders documenting Bush's guard training in May and June of 1973 after he returned from Alabama. Those documents note that Bush was not allowed to fly. A year earlier, he had lost his flying status when he failed to take a required medical exam.

The letter written by Bush's father, former President Bush, was addressed to Maj. Gen. G.B. Greene Jr., commander of the training center at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, where Bush took his basic training. The file does not contain Greene's letter to Bush's father, but shows the letter his father wrote back.

"I was surprised and very, very pleased to receive your letter of Aug. 27th," Bush wrote, adding that he was impressed that a senior officer would take interest in a new trainee.

"Naturally, as a father I was pleased to read your comments about George," Bush wrote. "He is anxiously looking forward to going to flight school and with parental pride, I do have the feeling that he will be a gung ho member of the U.S. Air Force. I think that he will make a good pilot as well."

The letter went on to say that young Bush, on his first trip back home, was full of enthusiasm and kept the family up talking about his first instructor, Sgt. Henry Onacki, who had impressed Bush with his love of country and dedication to the Air Force.

"In this day and age when it has become a little bit fashionable to be critical of the military, I was delighted to see him return to our house with a real pride in the service and with a great respect for the leaders that he had encountered at Lackland."

Both Mr. Bush's and John Kerry's military service records have become a major issue in the presidential race. New records that have surfaced in recent weeks have raised more questions.

Mr. Bush's critics say the president got preferential treatment as the son of a congressman and U.N. ambassador. Critics also question why Mr. Bush skipped a required medical examination in 1972 and failed to show up for drills during a six-month period that year.

Mr. Bush has repeatedly said he fulfilled all of his Air National Guard obligations.

The controversy over Mr. Bush's military service sharpened last week when CBS News' 60 Minutes disclosed memos said to be written by the late Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, Mr. Bush's National Guard commander.

The memos indicated that Killian had been pressured to sugarcoat Mr. Bush's performance, and that the future president had ignored an order to take a physical.

The authenticity of the memos have been challenged by critics who say the documents appear to have been prepared on a modern computer rather than a 1970-era typewriter, as would have been the case when Mr. Bush was in the guard.

Skeptics have also said the memos contain stylistic differences with other documents attributed to Killian, dated information and improper military lingo. Meanwhile, associates of the Col. Killian are split on whether the content of the memos reflected his thinking at the time.

CBS flew Killian's former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, 86, from Texas to New York for an interview. In the interview, Knox said she believed the documents were fake, but their content accurately reflected Killian's opinions.

"I know that I didn't type them," she said. "However, the information in those is correct."

Acknowledging questions raised about the documents suggesting lapses in Mr. Bush's National Guard service, CBS News promised a concerted effort to determine their authenticity while standing by its story.

"Enough questions have been raised that we are going redouble our efforts to answer those questions," CBS News President Andrew Heyward said.


©MMIV, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.


And Dookie, I don't buy your premises that The Incumbent and his Adninistration are incompetent and duplicitous, Al Queda is sound and thriving, the elections will not happen as scheduled, that the insugency is succeeding (I don't deny it is currently at a peak ... but I doubt seriously the insurgents can sustain the current level of operations - we'll see, but info I have from sources other than The Mainstream Media leads me to think the jihadists are sorely pressed, and without broad popular support). I also do not agree, nor do my correspondents, a few of whom are in relatively senior command positions, that either Iraq or Afghanistan is in need of "Many additional troops".

Sorry, I just don't share the viewpoint you express. I'm sure you're a fine person, with plenty of great qualities and unique talents, a worthy human in every regard. That we may differ in political outlook is no cause for rancor, but for dialogue ... not that either of us will change the other's mind, but that both of us may more clearly understand the perspective of the other.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 07:22 pm
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
flyboy804 wrote:
DontTreadonMe as evidence of Fox's conservative bias (a fact with which I don't disagree) used quotes from Niel Gabler and the "woman panelist". He failed to mention that these two are the liberal members of Fox's weekly program "Newswatch". I am not surprised that the two conservative panelists on the program were not quoted.


did i not say that i was going to make the clip available? then what would be the point of my quoting the whole thing?

so what's your point? just wanna say "look! the liberal didn't quote the conservatives! liberal bias! liberal bias!"

cool your jets until i find a way to post it. they don't make it easy to do here.
Cool


hey folks, sorry to put this up here, off of topic, but this thread is where the discussion on outfoxed sort of started. i'm not going to leave it up for long, so get it while ya can.

fox on air discusses republican bias

fox mp3
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Sep, 2004 08:58 pm
You heard it here first, kids :wink:

Quote:
Parallels Drawn Between CBS Memos, Texan's Postings

By Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 18, 2004; Page A02

The former Texas National Guard officer suspected of providing CBS News with possibly forged records on President Bush's military service called on Democratic activists to wage "war" against Republican "dirty tricks" in a series of Internet postings in which he also used phrases similar to several employed in the disputed documents.

Retired Lt. Col. Bill Burkett, who earlier said he overheard Bush aides conspiring with the commander of the Texas National Guard to "sanitize" the president's military records, has refused to comment on reports that he could be CBS's confidential source ...
"


Ain't the 'net grand? Mr. Green

Don't look like the blogbuzz re Kerry was the all the way on the mark though; it seems the Navy's Inspector General has concluded his Vietnam citations were "received in accordance with procedure":
Quote:
Navy Halts Kerry Medal Probe

The Navy's chief investigator has halted a formal investigation into questions about Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam combat decorations without answering key questions about the circumstances of those awards.

"Our examination found that existing documentation regarding the Silver Star, Bronze Star and Purple Heart medals indicates the awards approval process was properly followed," Navy inspector general, Vice Adm. R.A. Route said in a memo to Navy Secretary Gordon England ...


Not really conclusive for either camp ... the debate on this is likely to continue a while yet. Oh, well, Judicial Watch ain't 'specially known for stunning successes.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2004 11:01 am
Blogger Who Faulted CBS Documents Is Conservative Activist
As more information seeps into the news, it seems not unreasonable that Karl Rove may have been behind the false documents creation as some of us thought immediately after the story broke. How did MacDougald obtain copies of the documents within four hours of the CBS broadcast? I think the only way possible was if Karl Rove had created and planted them with MacDougald to try to discredit the CBS broadcast. Rove's goal would have been to divert attention away from the content of the documents re Bush's national guard lack of service. Rove's fall guy would have to be Retired Lt. Col. Bill Burkett, who history of hostility against Bush would be Rove's cover. Rove has known of Burkett's claims since at least February 2004 that he saw Bush's military records being tossed in the trash. Plenty of time to created false documents to discredit the revelation about Bush's guard "service" knowing the Medias' compulsive feeding frenzy would focus on the false documents and not their content.

One only need remember that Karl Rove bugged his own Texas office during the 2000 campaign and then blamed Democrats for doing it. He was caught in his lies and his long time tactics were exposed. I see the dirty hands of Karl Rove in this latest political move. It is so typical of his tactics. ---BBB


September 17, 2004
Blogger Who Faulted CBS Documents Is Conservative Activist
Harry W. MacDougald
By Peter Wallsten, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON ?- It was the first public allegation that CBS News used forged memos in its report questioning President Bush's National Guard service ?- a highly technical explanation posted within hours of airtime citing proportional spacing and font styles.

But it did not come from an expert in typography or typewriter history as some first thought. Instead, it was the work of Harry W. MacDougald, an Atlanta lawyer with strong ties to conservative Republican causes who helped draft the petition urging the Arkansas Supreme Court to disbar President Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the Times has found.

The identity of "Buckhead," a blogger known previously only by his screen name on the site freerepublic.com and lifted to folk hero status in the conservative blogosphere since last week's posting, is likely to fuel speculation among Democrats that the efforts to discredit the CBS memos were engineered by Republicans eager to undermine reports that Bush received preferential treatment in the National Guard more than 30 years ago.

Republican officials have denied any involvement among those debunking the CBS story.

Reached by telephone today, MacDougald, 46, confirmed that he is Buckhead, but declined to answer questions about his political background or how he knew so much about the CBS documents so fast.

"You can ask the questions but I'm not going to answer them," he told The Times. "I'm just going to stick to doing no interviews."

Until The Times identified him by piecing together information from his postings over the past two years, MacDougald had taken pains to remain in the shadows ?- saying the credit for challenging CBS should remain with the blogosphere as a whole and not one individual.

"Freepers collectively possess more analytical horsepower than the entire news division at CBS," he wrote in an e-mail, using the slang term for users of the freerepublic site.

MacDougald is a lawyer in the Atlanta office of the Winston-Salem, N.C.-based firm Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice and is affiliated with two prominent conservative legal groups, the Federalist Society and the Southeastern Legal Foundation, where he serves on the legal advisory board and has been involved in several high-profile cases.

Founded in 1976, the Southeastern Legal Foundation advocates "limited government, individual economic freedom, and the free enterprise system," according to its website.

The foundation has fought affirmative action and domestic partner benefits for government employees, and successfully challenged a Clinton administration plan to use proportional sampling, rather than a hard count, to estimate the population in the 2000 census.

MacDougald helped draft the foundation's petition in 1998 that led to the five-year suspension of Clinton's Arkansas law license for giving misleading testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

And MacDougald assisted in the group's legal challenge to the campaign finance law sponsored by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.). The challenge, ultimately presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, was funded largely by the Southeastern Legal Foundation in conjunction with Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the law's chief critic, and handled by former Clinton investigator Kenneth W. Starr.

The Supreme Court upheld the law, which banned unlimited contributions from corporations to federal candidates and political parties.

The foundation was joined in its challenge by a cadre of groups that spanned the ideological spectrum, including the National Rifle Association and the American Civil Liberties Union.

MacDougald is also a Republican appointee to the Fulton County Board of Registration and Election.

Last week, MacDougald once again plunged into a politically charged controversy ?- but this time his participation was anonymous.

Operating as "Buckhead," which is also the name of an upscale Atlanta neighborhood, MacDougald wrote that the memos that CBS' "60 Minutes" presented on Sept. 8 as being written in the early 1970s by the late Lt. Col Jerry B. Killian were "in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatino or Times New Roman."

"The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction of laser printers, word processing software, and personal computers," MacDougald wrote on the freerepublic website. "They were not widespread until the mid to late 90's. Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn't used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang systems that were dominant in the mid 80's used monospaced fonts.

"I am saying these documents are forgeries, run through a copier for 15 generations to make them look old. This should be pursued aggressively."

The Sept. 8 late-night posting ?- written less than four hours after the CBS report was aired ?- resulted in a flurry of sympathetic testimonials from fellow bloggers, spreading within hours to other sites. The next day, major newspapers such as The Times and the Washington Post began consulting forensic experts and reporting stories that raised similar questions.

CBS has insisted that the four memos, dated from 1972 and 1973, had been authenticated by the network's experts and by "close associates" of Killian, who confirm "that the documents reflect his opinions and actions at the time."

The memos showed Killian resisting pressure by a higher-up to "sugarcoat" Bush's performance evaluation and ordering Bush to take a physical examination so he could keep flying.

CBS has cited an expert, Bill Glennon, an information technology consultant, who said IBM electric typewriters that were in use in 1972 could provide proportional spacing and the superscript ?- the small "th" ?- evident in the disputed memos.

The network also has sought to counter the arguments by referring to a typewriting script distributor, who says the typing style in the memos has been available since 1931. Moreover, CBS points out, some of the lettering in question was evident in Bush's military records previously released by the White House.

Still, when Killian's former secretary came forward this week to say she did not believe the memos were authentic either, anchor Dan Rather and other network executives stopped asserting that the memos were real. They said they would "redouble" efforts to resolve unanswered questions.

While bloggers and some conservative activists hailed Buckhead as a hero in their longtime efforts to paint the mainstream media as politically biased, some Democrats and even some conservative bloggers have marveled at Buckhead's detailed knowledge of the memos and wondered whether that suggested a White House conspiracy.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe even speculated openly to reporters that the whole thing could have been orchestrated by White House political advisor Karl Rove. The Bush campaign called the allegation "nonsense."

MacDougald is an outspoken conservative and a Republican active in local politics.

"I attended a meeting on Tuesday to organize lawyers for Bush-Cheney in my state to monitor and, if necessary, litigate election issues," he told fellow "freepers" in a Buckhead posting last month.

As a lawyer, MacDougald has represented government waste whistle-blowers and has challenged affirmative action laws that give racial and ethnic minorities preferences in higher education.

He is not a big financial contributor to political causes, having donated $250 to the Georgia Republican Party in 2002, when Christian Coalition founder Ralph Reed was chairman. Reed is now a senior strategist for the Bush campaign.

Associates of MacDougald scoff at the notion that he was doing anything but acting alone when he offered his observations about the CBS memos.

"Harry is a very strong conservative and a very passionate conservative so if he sees something that looks fishy, he's going to say something about it," said Lynn Hogue, a Georgia State University law professor and former executive director of the Southeastern Legal Foundation.

"When he's not absorbed with work, I think he spends the rest of his life in the wee hours of the morning on freerepublic," Hogue added. "And that's the outlet through which he shares his concerns and insights, and so rather than being a matter of conspiracy, it's just him doing what he does."
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2004 11:31 am
"I Am Buckhead": Newspaper Exposes Blog Folk Hero
Wow! Even Editors and Publishers seem to see Karl Rove's fingerprint on this latest dust up. BBB

"I Am Buckhead": Newspaper Exposes Blog Folk Hero
By Editors & Publishers Staff
Published: September 18, 2004
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000632714

NEW YORK It was the scoop of the day in the presidential campaign (which tells you something): The Los Angeles Times found Buckhead.

The paper reports that it has solved the mystery of who exactly posted the very first (and in some minds, very suspicious) blog blast at the credibility of the "60 Minutes" Killian memos. But as the Times put it, "it did not come from an expert in typography or typewriter history as some first thought."

Buckhead, as he was known at the Free Republic site, has been unmasked as Harry MacDougald, an Atlanta lawyer with strong ties to conservative Republican causes. He even helped draft the petition urging the Arkansas Supreme Court to disbar President Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

His identity, the Times says, "is likely to fuel speculation among Democrats that the efforts to discredit the CBS memos were engineered by Republicans eager to undermine reports that Bush received preferential treatment in the National Guard more than 30 years ago." GOP officials have denied this.

Reached by telephone by the Times on Friday, MacDougald, 46, confirmed that he is Buckhead but declined to answer questions.

MacDougald, a lawyer in Atlanta, is affiliated with two prominent conservative legal groups, the Federalist Society and the Southeastern Legal Foundation, where he serves on the legal advisory board.

Suspicions that MacDougald may have been tipped off have arisen because his quick comments on typography seemed to go far beyond his reputed expertise. He wrote that the memos purportedly written in the early 1970s by the late Lt. Col Jerry B. Killian were "in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatino or Times New Roman....The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction of laser printers, word processing software and personal computers," MacDougald wrote. "They were not widespread until the mid to late 90's. Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn't used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang systems that were dominant in the mid 80's used monospaced fonts."
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Sep, 2004 11:46 am
Quote:
Texan Involved in CBS Report Tried to Help Kerry Campaign


By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and JIM RUTENBERG

Published: September 18, 2004


BAIRD, Tex., Sept. 17 - Bill Burkett, the former Texas National Guard officer who has been caught up in the mystery of how CBS News acquired memos that seem to question President Bush's Vietnam-era National Guard service, unsuccessfully offered information and advice to help the Kerry campaign attack Mr. Bush, according to a posting Mr. Burkett wrote in an e-mail newsletter.

"I spent some time on the phone with the Kerry campaign seniors yesterday," Mr. Burkett wrote on Aug. 21 in an e-mail letter circulated to a list of about 600 Texas Democrats.

He complained that he had to "get through seven layers of bureaucratic kids trying to get a job after the election."

"I talked with Max Cleland," Mr. Burkett continued, referring to the former senator from Georgia who has been supporting Senator John Kerry's Democratic presidential bid.

Alluding to advertisements by a veterans group that deprecates Mr. Kerry's Vietnam service, Mr. Burkett continued, "I asked if they wanted to counterattack or ride this to ground and outlast it, not spending any money. He said counterattack."


"So I gave them the information to do it with," Mr. Burkett wrote. "But none of them have called me back."

Mr. Burkett did not say what information he offered. Earlier this year, he gained attention for saying that in 1998 he saw aides to Gov. George W. Bush of Texas and Guard officials dispose of pieces of Mr. Bush's National Guard record that could prove politically embarrassing. Mr. Bush's aides have denied his account.

"I volunteered to come back out with more," Mr. Burkett wrote.

Mr. Burkett, who was at home on his ranch in Baird, near Abilene, on Friday, declined to comment.

]Mr. Cleland said in a telephone interview that Mr. Burkett called him "a couple of weeks ago," as he was out campaigning for Mr. Kerry.

"I couldn't swear to it whether he used the term documents or information," Mr. Cleland said. "It was some kind of stuff, some kind of information he wanted to get to the campaign, or something, regarding Bush's National Guard service. I referred him up to somebody in the campaign."


Mr. Cleland said he received up to 100 calls a week from people with tips and ideas. "He sounded like he had something," Mr. Cleland said. "But of course, in this business, you go around, every friend, everyone around the corner, has some something or other."

Campaign officials said Mr. Cleland had referred Mr. Burkett to someone at the campaign who passed his message on to the research department, where the message was set aside amid the deluge of other calls.

Mr. Burkett has returned to national attention since CBS News and "60 Minutes" reported last week on four memos reportedly from the personal files of Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, Mr. Bush's squadron commander, who died 20 years ago. The memos said that Colonel Killian was under pressure to "sugar coat" the record of the young Lieutenant Bush and that the officer had disobeyed a direct order to take a physical.

Forensic experts, a secretary who said she typed Lieutenant Killian's memos and members of his family have said that they doubt the authenticity of the documents. CBS News has said it is evaluating their legitimacy and has declined to identify its sources. But one person at CBS confirmed an account in Newsweek that Mr. Burkett had helped with the reports. The official was unable to say what role he played.

Mr. Burkett is an avid Democrat and a frequent contributor to the Texas Democratic e-mail list. His name also shows up occasionally as a contributor of criticism of the Bush administration on a Web site, onlinejournal.com. Asked about his contributions to that site, Mr. Burkett on Friday declined to comment. His wife, Nicki, later confirmed that the articles were indeed his.

His many online musings provide a glimpse of his thinking, including his intense desire to remove Mr. Bush from office. They include some inconclusive references to the possibility of more documents appearing about Mr. Bush's Guard service. Aside from the CBS report, the Pentagon on Friday released new documents from Mr. Bush's files.

Addressing Mr. Bush rhetorically in an article on the Web site on Aug. 25, Mr. Burkett wrote, "I know from your files that we have now reassembled, the fact that you did not fulfill your oath, taken when you were commissioned to 'obey the orders of the officers appointed over you.' " On Sept. 4, shortly before CBS News broadcast its report, Mr. Burkett told the Democratic e-mail list he had a hunch that more material might soon emerge to embarrass the president. "No proof, just gut instinct," Mr. Burkett added.

Mr. Burkett's lawyer, David Van Os, said his client had not fabricated any documents. "From my knowledge of Bill's character, I am 100 percent positively, unequivocally certain that Bill Burkett has not created or falsified any documents," Mr. Van Os said.

In another development, ABC News reported on Friday that former Col. Walter B. Staudt - who interviewed Mr. Bush for enrollment to the Texas Air National Guard in 1968 and who was named in a disputed Killian memo as exerting influence on behalf of Mr. Bush - said he "never pressured anybody about George Bush." He also told ABC News that he planned to vote for Mr. Bush.


David D. Kirkpatrick reported from Baird for this article, and Jim Rutenberg from New York. Nathan Levy contributed reporting from Baird.


Rathergate is goin' places, BBB, but it ain't gonna go anyplace near The Whitehouse, or anywhere else that's gonna do any good at all for The Democrats and Kerry, or for CBS and Rather. Now, sometimes, these things just sorta fade from the scene. Maybe that's what will happen here, and I would not be surprised if that turns out to be the case. On the otherhand, sometimes these things just keep growin' and growin', as did Watergate or Iran-Contra, for instance. It would not surprise me if this flap turned into something like that, either; at this point it could go either way. If it does really blow up and take on a life of its own, it will be the pivotal event of The Election, and will be recorded as the scandal which destroyed the Democratic Campaign of 2004.

And right now, I gotta say, whatever happens, the current tack of tryin' to blame this on Rove illustrates perfectly, and totally confirms, my hypothesis that as opposed to looking inward to discover, address, and remedy the causes of their decline, the Democrats fail to take responsibility, refuse to admit, or even to recognize, the truth, and futiley seek to lay blame on "Those evil Republicans". The Republicans have done far, far less damage to The Democrats than have The Democrats themselves.

And they just keep gettin' better and better at it. What is it with them ... a deathwish?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/02/2026 at 03:43:54