8
   

National Review Calls Bernie Sanders A Nazi

 
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 2 May, 2016 03:45 pm
@Tes yeux noirs,
Tes yeux noirs wrote:
He never gave a damn about Knoxie, and doesn't give a damn about Bernie Sanders, or Nazis, either .

Unlike you I have a strong sense of ethics and believe in doing the right thing.


Tes yeux noirs wrote:
He just gets a boner from pissing people off.

You have me confused with Contrex. He's the one who has admitted to trolling.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 May, 2016 04:32 pm
Quote:
Sanders is being called a "political Nazi" , in part, because his socialist views , according the author, are very similar to those socialist views held by Nazis.


According to the Dictionary, Nazism is the ideology and practice of the Nazis.

Characteristics associated with Nazism:

1. Racist nationalism
2. National expansion
3. State control of the economy

Instead of the author calling Sanders "a political Nazi", it would have been more correct ( in my opinion) to state that Sanders has emphasized the importance of "State control of the US economy" and not have called Sanders a Nazi.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 06:02 am
@oralloy,
Bernie is entitled to disagree with thepolitics of Israel and to call their response to the Gaza rockets disproportionate. It was in fact disproportionate. Just compare the number of death from those rockets to the number of deaths from Israel's retaliation...

When you use antisemitic concepts to tarr a Jew, like "self-hating Jew", you are in fact spreading Nazi ideas. You are also trying to stiffle freedom of speech.

Do you think Elie Wiesel was a Nazi?

Quote:
the [recently discovered] archived version [of Wiesel's early manuscript of Night, about the Holocaust] also included harsh criticism of many Jews who either yielded to temptation or were tempted to believe that nothing bad would befall them. Wiesel settles accounts with those among his people who shut their eyes and ears to what was happening, and blames them for paving the Nazis’ way to committing their horrors. [...]

He also reserves criticism for the Jewish leadership, both in Palestine and globally. “We didn’t know a thing [in Europe], while they knew in the Land of Israel, and they knew in London, and they knew in New York. The world was silent and the Jewish world was silent. Why silent? Why did it not find it vital to inform us of what was going on in Germany? Why did they not warn us? Why? I also accuse the Jewish world and its leaders for not warning us, at least about the danger awaiting us in ambush so that we’d seek rescue routes.”

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.717093
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 06:28 am
@Olivier5,
No the response is not disproportionate as it was the response needed to dull the attacks and the fact that it result in a lot more Palestinians dying then Jews is their concern and it is in their power to stop by stopping the attacks.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 06:29 am
@BillRM,
Okay so it wouldn't be disproportionate for the Palestinians to kill 1000 Israeli for each and every Palestinian kid shot by an IDF criminal on his or her way to school, since that's what it would take to stop Israel killing Pal kids?
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 06:35 am
@Olivier5,
Never hear that the Jews was randomly killing children on their way to school.

Had hear how the Palestinians was launching war rockets at random into population centers in an attempt to kill men women and children.

An if they did not care for the trade off of deaths all they needed to do was to stop launching those rockets.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 06:40 am
@BillRM,
It's not always on their way to school, but it happens quite often. I'll write to my representative asap to make sure those Pals get the nuclear weapons they need to respond in a very measured and proportional way to IDF killings... A couple of nuclear bombs should be enough to get the Israelis to stop, don't you think?
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:07 am
@Olivier5,
Given that the Jews are said to have 300 plus nuclear weapons really to go giving the Pals a few nukes should end the conflict for forever and a day if they are stupid enough to use them.

The Jews had learn their lesson as being able and willing to defend themselves.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:20 am
@BillRM,
It'd be like nuking one's own backyard... Absurd, but yeah, they could well do it. In fact, the Israelis keep shooting themselves in the foot all the time. That's the essence of what Biden said the other day.

In any case, their response was disproportionate. That's a fact: there was no proportion between the threat and the response. There is nothing Nazi in saying that. Facts are not Nazis.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:32 am
@Olivier5,
No they should allowed thousands and I mean thousands of warheads to land on their population centers at random

I know if Mexico get mad over Trump programs and begin to launch thousands of missiles over the fence we would come down like the hammer of god on them

Sorry in any case but the Jews are no longer soft targets and victims and will do whatever it take to deal with such threats as we would.



Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:33 am
@BillRM,
So when you guys got 3000 people killed by a bunch of Saudis, you responded by killing 3 million Saudis, right? Now that makes sense...
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:46 am
@Olivier5,
As said all the pals would need to do to bring their death tolls to zero is to stop trying to kill Jews so no matter how uneven the trade offs as far as deaths is concern my eyes remain dry.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:52 am
@BillRM,
And you can prove that, right?

The IDF kills kids in the West Bank because they enjoy killing them. It's a form of sport.
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:55 am
@Olivier5,
Actually we didn't, we responded by first going into Afghanistan where Bin Laden was because he was the head of AQ who carried out the attack and then because there was not enough visible targets for Rumsfeld they decided on a side trip to Iraq.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 07:57 am
@Olivier5,
Right and you would had just love the 1930s when you could round up jews and kills them without any fight back by them.

How dare they now defend their women and children?
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 08:01 am
@revelette2,
I know you didn't. I was just making an sardonic remark. The US took 3000 casuilties and did NOT retaliate by killing millions of innocents. And rightly so. And whenever a Mexican kills an American in Tijuana or elsewhere, the US is not carpet-bombing Mexico. 'Cause that would be totally disproportionate.
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 08:02 am
@BillRM,
Perhaps they wouldn't have to defend their women and children if they wouldn't keep stealing land and oppressing all non-Jews in Israel and Palestine.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 08:03 am
@BillRM,
How dare the Pals defend their land, their women and their kids, huh?
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 08:03 am
@Olivier5,
Agreed
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 May, 2016 09:04 am
@Olivier5,
Fine with me if the pals like to keep trying to wipe the jewish state off the map just not the tears when they come up on the short end.

In fact I find it amazing that the jews just do not place them on ships and have them find homes far away from Israel as we did with moving the tribes out west and away from our eastern populations centers.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 04:43:53