@Lash,
It's an AP guideline for use of a specific term that might not be well-known to the general public. It cautions against blindly adopting a term used by extremist groups to rebrand certain beliefs and ideologies, and suggests to explain what the term actually means and stands for instead.
He explicitly says "Avoid using the term generically and without definition."
Nowhere does he suggest that journalists should no longer report names, quotes, and facts. In fact, he specifically says "when writing on extreme groups, be precise and provide evidence to support the characterization."
How do you get from this that he wants to stop journalists reporting names, quotes, and facts? What do you base this on?